Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Adam on June 15, 2016, 11:04:AM
-
I appreciate supporters, undecided's and former supporters have to say the silencer evidence was fabricated. This evidence alone shows without doubt that the silencer was on the rifle during the massacre and means Bamber is guilty. It is the most famous piece of forensic evidence in the library.
Similar to saying Bamber is innocent and then refusing to say how Sheila committed the massacre, people do not say how the silencer evidence was fabricated. Just claim it was.
Bamber, decades later has said it was the relatives who fabricated the silencer evidence. But has not elaborated on how they expertly put Sheila's blood, paint and Neville's white hair into the silencer. It is a deeply offensive and outrageous accusation which the relatives refuted and correctly said there was enough evidence without the silencer.
Mike agrees the relatives handed in a silencer with blood, paint and a white hair on. But says the police then handed in a second silencer which incriminated Bamber. The police using Sheila's blood which they had taken from the crime scene and kept in their fridge. The lab team not noticing they had two silencers. It would be a surprise if the police did this, as the evidence on the silencer the relatives handed in seemed very promising.
The police testified they did not find the silencer. Which they were not looking for. Both the police and relatives testify that the relatives found the silencer at WHF. Basil Cock and BW were at the property with the relatives. So the silencer was definately at WHF. If used in the massacre, it would have the recorded evidence on.
I've already posted how it was impossible for the relatives or police to expertly fabricate the silencer to fool the lab. That is after total suspension of reality is applied by believing respected police or law abiding citizens would even think about doing this in the first place.
I look forward to people saying who and how the silencer evidence was so successfully fabricated, it is still accepted by the courts today. All people would then have to do, is prove it happened.
-
Sadly it seems that no one can think of a way in which the relatives or the police could successfully contaminate the silencer. Which is warped as supporters, undecided's and former supporters say it was contaminated.
This is the same as supporters not being able to say how Sheila committed the massacre, but still claiming Bamber is innocent.
Another poster on another forum said he is waiting for David's response. David claimed he has previously already posted it, although I have not seen it. Hopefully he is not just saying this because he hasn't got an explanation, and will re post it for evaluation.