Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Adam on June 12, 2016, 08:27:AM
-
The submitted to court and current silencer evidence:
This shows 100% the silencer was on the rifle throughout the massacre.
The possibility of the silencer evidence being incorrect:
There was no possibility of all the evidence on the silencer being wrong due to human error or testing methods.
There was no possibility of the police or relatives successfully contaminating the silencer.
The evidence was accepted at court. Further tests have just reaffirmed the evidence. With Sheila matching 13 out of 17 markers.
Implications of the undisputed silencer evidence:
The silencer evidence alone shows Bamber is 100% guilty.
It was impossible for Sheila to commit the massacre and leave this evidence on the silencer.
There are multiple obstacles and no reason why Sheila would put the silencer on pre massacre.
It is not confirmed that Sheila knew how to insert the silencer, knew where it was or considered it advantageous to use.
Bamber testified he was proficient with the murder weapon.
There are multiple reasons why Bamber would use a silencer.
There are multiple reasons why Bamber would put the silencer away.
_________________
All of the above points are the result of recent investigations resulting in undisputed threads.
On this one piece of evidence alone, Bamber is guilty, beyond reasonable doubt. Although there are over a hundred supporting pieces of incriminating forensic and circumstantial evidence. Some of which is in the library.
-
Where does it state " beyond reasonable doubt ?"
-
Where does it state " beyond reasonable doubt ?"
It says it in my thread post. My silencer investigations show Bamber is 100% guilty.
The jury voted guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
-
It says it in my thread post. My silencer investigations show Bamber is 100% guilty.
The jury voted guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
Documented ? Not just because YOU said so.
-
Documented ? Not just because YOU said so.
Lookout the jury voted Bamber guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
The silencer evidence has always shown this. There was a very slim chance of human error or deliberate contamination as suggested by optimistic supporters. But my investigations show this was impossible.
You must post as a guilter. The evidence shows he is 100% guilty. You can still debate the case, as other guilters do. Some who were previous supporters.
-
Lookout the jury voted Bamber guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
The silencer evidence has always shown this. There was a very slim chance of human error or deliberate contamination as suggested by optimistic supporters. But my investigations show this was impossible.
You must post as a guilter. The evidence shows he is 100% guilty. You can still debate the case, as other guilters do. Some who were previous supporters.
I'm not interested in what the jury stated. I want to see the " beyond reasonable doubt " in black and white/ documented .
-
Lookout the jury voted Bamber guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
The silencer evidence has always shown this. There was a very slim chance of human error or deliberate contamination as suggested by optimistic supporters. But my investigations show this was impossible.
You must post as a guilter. The evidence shows he is 100% guilty. You can still debate the case, as other guilters do. Some who were previous supporters.
yes adam i agree ,lookout should follow the advice in the last paragraph above :)
-
I'm not interested in what the jury stated. I want to see the " beyond reasonable doubt " in black and white/ documented .
Then you should want to see the same case evidence that Sheila was responsible - in black and white.
-
Then you should want to see the same case evidence that Sheila was responsible - in black and white.
Another cop-out on your part. I asked the question first and it WASN'T referring to Sheila.
-
I'm not interested in what the jury stated. I want to see the " beyond reasonable doubt " in black and white/ documented .
nit picking you know full well it was 10 out of 12 that were convinced beyond reasonable doubt,so now do you want us to fake a document to say the above,the innocent camp would do that, but we dont,had they found jb not guilty iam sure you would be happy :)
-
nit picking you know full well it was 10 out of 12 that were convinced beyond reasonable doubt,so now do you want us to fake a document to say the above,the innocent camp would do that, but we dont,had they found jb not guilty iam sure you would be happy :)
I couldn't give a flying f++k that it was 10 out of 12.What I'm after is something WRITTEN which states by the LAW that it was beyond reasonable doubt !
-
I couldn't give a flying f++k that it was 10 out of 12.What I'm after is something WRITTEN which states by the LAW that it was beyond reasonable doubt !
well you might have to wait a long time,about the same time as jb has spent in the nick,what law you talking about ,not sods law :)
-
well you might have to wait a long time,about the same time as jb has spent in the nick,what law you talking about ,not sods law :)
It was sods law that got him inside !!
-
It was sods law that got him inside !!
ive had a fair share of sods law :)
-
ive had a fair share of sods law :)
Think sods law affects s all sami. Have you thought about checking out food intolerances? :)
-
ive had a fair share of sods law :)
Well you know how it feels then !
-
Think sods law affects s all sami. Have you thought about checking out food intolerances? :)
yes maggie ive booked a test through gp.but the state of the nhs at the moment i cant say when they will see me :)
-
Well you know how it feels then !
i dont dwell on it lookout,i just get on with life :)
-
yes maggie ive booked a test through gp.but the state of the nhs at the moment i cant say when they will see me :)
Try the acid test !!
-
Try the acid test !!
now now lookout, :)
-
now now lookout, :)
I think Lookout was trying to be friendly Sami not Nasty
-
I think Lookout was trying to be friendly Sami not Nasty
oh apologies :)