Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on March 19, 2011, 01:10:PM
-
Sunday Times magazine Article / David James Smith / 11th July 2010...
Read the article:-
-
I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!
-
I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!
Me too and all I can say is what a disappointment. This guy is granted the first interview EVER with JB and all he gives us is a handful of irrelevant oneliners. He was supposed to be with JB for several hours. I am sure he got something more valuable than what we were given in print.
-
I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!
Me too and all I can say is what a disappointment. This guy is granted the first interview EVER with JB and all he gives us is a handful of irrelevant oneliners. He was supposed to be with JB for several hours. I am sure he got something more valuable than what we were given in print.
Couldnt agree more , awful journalism why didnt he research the evidence and do what people on here try to do pick holes in it ,or not as the case maybe , then anything that doesnt look good for JB get his explanation !
-
More on the author:
Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.
'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB
-
More on the author:
Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.
'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB
Are you saying its the same reporter ?
-
More on the author:
Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.
'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB
Are you saying its the same reporter ?
Is my post unclear? I provided the source?
I recalled the name from the Daily Mail article and since that name is in the subject line of this thread, I thought I'd post the relevant part of that article, along with the source.
The Daily Mail article is by 'Daily Mail Reporter'. I have no idea who that is.
-
Have just had a look at the link that you posted.Regarding the two photographs of the gun in and not in the window.........is it just me,or do they not even appear to be the same room? In the photo WITH the gun,where have the curtains disappeared to? Or even the wallpaper ? (look to the right of the window).The photo without the gun is clearly the main bedroom,but IMO the photo without the gun appears to be some kind of junk/storage room.Note the mess and ironing board etc.Does anyone recall seeing an ironing board in any of the other photos of main bedroom? Im off to have a look :-\
-
Had some problems finding it again online. But have found it here.
-
Says silencer was sticky, as if it had been hurridly cleaned.
The article is on Jeremy's official site. But it was not not appearing when I clicked on it earlier.
-
thanks for that adam.
-
How do you deduce that a silencer has been hurriedly wiped because it is sticky??? Just BS. For all I know it could have been sticky from all the rellie-fingers pawing at it!
-
For Susan.
-
Adam don't open your links you may have put a virus in it for me ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Says silencer was sticky, as if it had been hurridly cleaned.
The article is on Jeremy's official site. But it was not not appearing when I clicked on it earlier.
Adam, HOW very interesting. TOTAL bollocks of course, but still interesting. Please enlighten me as to how THREE DAY OLD blood "was sticky, as if it had been hurriedly cleaned"? Are you trying to say that blood remains sticky however long it remains in contact with a surface? Are you tryin g to say that a certain type of blood remains in contact with a surface? Are you saying that had it been cleaned slowly as opposed to "hurriedly" it wouldn't be sticky?
-
april love your post ;D ;D ;D ;D hope Adam is taking notice I will be going off shortly so you and Adam can share posts ;D I will return.
-
april love your post ;D ;D ;D ;D hope Adam is taking notice I will be going off shortly so you and Adam can share posts ;D I will return.
NOT a prospect to entirely relish, Susan. Perhaps I too should leave and return later. Adams admits that he's happy not to be responded to. ;) ;) ;)
-
Adam, HOW very interesting. TOTAL bollocks of course, but still interesting. Please enlighten me as to how THREE DAY OLD blood "was sticky, as if it had been hurriedly cleaned"? Are you trying to say that blood remains sticky however long it remains in contact with a surface? Are you tryin g to say that a certain type of blood remains in contact with a surface? Are you saying that had it been cleaned slowly as opposed to "hurriedly" it wouldn't be sticky?
This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?
I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.
-
This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?
I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.
REALLY Adam? You mean to tell me that the personal view of a professional journalist of the calibre employed by the Sunday Times, is that traces of three day old blood on a non absorbent surface are sticky. Silly me, I thought the rellies had said it. Perhaps next time you quote you should make it clear, not only that it IS a quote, but WHOSE it is and I wouldn't accuse YOU of talking bollocks when it was someone else who was responsible.
-
This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?
I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.
Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!
-
Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!
Caroline, thanks for the vindication :)
-
Caroline, thanks for the vindication :)
You're welcome April :)
-
Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!
I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.
You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.
-
I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.
You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.
If you read it, why insist that it was an interview with Jeremy when it was quite clear that April was referring to the David Boutflour comments??
I already know what I think about the case the the 14 point list you dragged from another board isn't going to make any difference. The 14 point list is simply the 'authors' take on things (which isn't you).
As for your last comment ....... cheeky!! :-*
-
I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.
You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.
Please don't flatter yourself by imagining that people believe you have the answers.
-
For Graheme.
-
For Graheme.
Exact words that bamber is supposed to have said against JM please. That is an article. Now show me the words of bamber please.
-
He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.
'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'
Both from the Sunday Times article.
-
He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.
'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'
Both from the Sunday Times article.
Well, she tried to smother him, so basically he is telling the truth!
-
He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.
'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'
Both from the Sunday Times article.
So firstly you show me this article as PROOF of what bad things that Bamber is supposed to hjave said about JM. But you end up repudiating the article yourself? Man you are totally mixed up. ;D
-
So firstly you show me this article as PROOF of what bad things that Bamber is supposed to hjave said about JM. But you end up repudiating the article yourself? Man you are totally mixed up. ;D
???
-
???
What, memory gone again?