Please, take a good long hard look at both images, and explain to me, how spots of spattered blood can appear along the edge of the large bloodstain in one image, yet be absent from the other, do you really think I am such a fool as not to realize and know the significance of such basic observations...
Here we go again, mystic Bridget, trying to blame the quality of the photographs for such discrepancies - when will they stop being so pathetic with thier excuses - everybody can see the shape and size of the bloodstains are significantly different, which planet do you come from, the blind one...
Fucking hell, give me strength...
Tell you what, bird brain of Britain, let Bambers campaign team get the negatives of the originals and lets see if these differences are visible between both negatives, give me strength all mighty god, to put up with such nonsense from these people, they will stop at nothing to protect the honesty and integrity of these dishonest / evil police officers who stage managed Sheila's body, took pictures afterwards, and used those images to blame Jeremy Bamber for having done the stage managing...
Either talk sensible, or stop reading what I post, put me on ignore...
::)
We'll just let other readers decide whether or not the lack of spots on the second photograph is down to photo quality shall we?
First photo:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=4311;image
Second photo:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=4308;image
::)
We'll just let other readers decide whether or not the lack of spots on the second photograph is down to photo quality shall we?
First photo:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=4311;image
Second photo:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=4308;image
In order to adjust Sheila's nightdress, as shown in the two posted images, one or two things had to occur, (1) Sheila's right hand had to be removed from rifle, (2) rifle had to be removed, (3), nightdress had to be readjusted...
Then the whole process, had to be done in reverse, in order that second photograph could be taken...
But can you see what I mean about the blue triangle?
But can you see what I mean about the blue triangle?
The bible should give you a clue. Then again, not sure. But there is a blue triangle contained within the stain on one image that is not replicated in the other image.
Different camera angles, that's all.
Here, look at this:-
Mystic Bridget, argues that the reason for the change in shape of the bloodstain on the nightdress is due to the change of angle that both photographs which captured these two images were taken in - now lets look into the logic of what the mystic has said, and is saying...
She advocates that the photographer moves from his original position where he took this photo, to a different position at which point he took a second image. Now, in order to achieve what mystic Bridget is advocating, the photographer has to move to the right, to have any chance of capturing a different view of the bloodstain in question, which effectively moves the end of the guns barrel, shown in image (1), to the left:-
Both images were taken at the scene by PC Bird (SOC) after 10 O'clock, on 7th August 1985:-It is very difficult to see Mike. But there is some kind of spotting in that area in the photo on the left. But it is very faint. The photo on the right seems to be brighter and therefore the spotting appears more definite. Also it appears that the photo on the left was taken at a slightly different angle to the one on the right. This can be seen in the definite shadow of the crease in the one on the left caused by the flash probably? But then again I notice the blue triangles as well.
Different camera angles, that's all.
I very much doubt it Bridget. The position of triangular sliver I am referring to is easily placed in respect of where it should be on the other photo. It is missing. The only way that can happen is if the folds are in a different position.Possibly caused when they moved the gun? Looking generally at the two pictures though and looking at Sheila's hair, it does not look as if they moved her body, as every hair on her head is in exactly the same place?
Possibly caused when they moved the gun? Looking generally at the two pictures though and looking at Sheila's hair, it does not look as if they moved her body, as every hair on her head is in exactly the same place?