Jeremy Bamber Forum

JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on March 01, 2011, 10:04:PM

Title: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: mike tesko on March 01, 2011, 10:04:PM
Ann Eaton - relative
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: TheBrilliantMistake on March 01, 2011, 10:05:PM
Christine Ann Eaton I believe
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: mike tesko on March 01, 2011, 10:08:PM
Christine Ann Eaton I believe
---------------------------

Correct...
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: TheBrilliantMistake on March 01, 2011, 10:14:PM
Christine Ann Eaton I believe
---------------------------

Correct...

I shouldn't laugh but it seems the family were in two distinct halves - the damn good looking ones and the downright ugly ones - it's little wonder so much tension existed!

Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: shonapugs on March 01, 2011, 10:20:PM
TBM, can you ever forgive me for briefly thinking that you might be HorseyDave? Sorry, matey. Ann Eaton looks like an annoyed Joan Baez.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: joolz1975 on March 01, 2011, 10:25:PM
She looks guilty, lets blame her!! ;)
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: TheBrilliantMistake on March 01, 2011, 10:30:PM
TBM, can you ever forgive me for briefly thinking that you might be HorseyDave? Sorry, matey. Ann Eaton looks like an annoyed Joan Baez.

I'm not HorseyDave, that's for sure - don't know who he is other than seeing the name bounded about a little.

I suspect I'm older than you, she looks ok to me!
That said, I'd only go to sleep with her with one eye open.... any woman who can move right into that house has more nerve than I do!

Diane Keen (I think) did a little interview with her once (Keen was playing her in a TV drama about the murders). Keen said the light in the kitchen was still broken! ... but, that Ann was a pleasant woman.

(Then I again, I hear Peter Sutcliffe was a bit of a charmer!)
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Elizabeth on March 02, 2011, 10:54:AM
Quote
That said, I'd only go to sleep with her with one eye open.... any woman who can move right into that house has more nerve than I do!

Very funny, TBM!  ;D
I find it very peculiar her being able to move into WHF after the murders, too.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Hartley on March 02, 2011, 10:59:AM
Quote
That said, I'd only go to sleep with her with one eye open.... any woman who can move right into that house has more nerve than I do!

Very funny, TBM!  ;D
I find it very peculiar her being able to move into WHF after the murders, too.

Note that they didn't move into whf until 6 years after the murders.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Elizabeth on March 02, 2011, 11:04:AM
It doesn't matter when they moved in, still five murders occurred there.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Hartley on March 02, 2011, 11:40:AM
It doesn't matter when they moved in, still five murders occurred there.

Point out to me where I stated that it mattered? I was simply clarifying that they did not move in immediately after, that's all.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: andrea on March 02, 2011, 11:59:AM
i was under the impression they moved in straightaway, jeremy asked peter eaton if he would like to be the new manager of the farm, and he accepted.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Hartley on March 02, 2011, 12:04:PM
i was under the impression they moved in straightaway, jeremy asked peter eaton if he would like to be the new manager of the farm, and he accepted.

Apart from two cats the house remained unoccupied until 1992. The Eatons did take over the farm management but did not move into whf until 1992, in fact the only reason they did move in six years later was due to the conditions of the agricultural holdings lease agreement.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Elizabeth on March 02, 2011, 12:06:PM
By you writing that they didn't move in until six years after the murders, i simply responded that it makes no difference when they did. It is peculiar in my eyes for anyone (let alone a relative) to move into a place where not just one murder took place, but five.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Hartley on March 02, 2011, 12:11:PM
By you writing that they didn't move in until six years after the murders, i simply responded that it makes no difference when they did. It is peculiar in my eyes for anyone (let alone a relative) to move into a place where not just one murder took place, but five. Stop twisting things around! Incidently, i am well aware that you have thumbed me down twice now for my opinions (which don't fit with yours), i am not blind! And if you want to be childish, two can play that game. What is your problem? everyone is entitled to their own opinion, not just you! I assume you are the same Hartley that was a previous member on here? The one who has made their feelings known that they believe Jeremy is as guilty as sin, and who thumbs down anyone and everyone who disagrees with his views. Do you want to know what i think? You talk absolute piffle  ;D

Get a grip.  ???


I was clarifying the comment below. That is all.
Quote
That said, I'd only go to sleep with her with one eye open.... any woman who can move right into that house has more nerve than I do!

Very funny, TBM!  ;D
I find it very peculiar her being able to move into WHF after the murders, too.
Title: Re: Ann Eaton - relative
Post by: Hartley on March 02, 2011, 12:33:PM
For the reasons i mentioned, i think it is you that needs to get a grip.

With all due respect I think you have the wrong idea about my opinion as to the guilt or innocence of JB, perhaps you missed this post I made?


My opinion is that I believe that there is no evidence of much merit which undisputably points either to his innocence or guilt. (That I've seen)

Edit: But what evidence that there is sways me toward thinking he's much more likely to be guilty than innocent.

In any event, judging from your animosity towards me I would suggest there is little point in continuing a discussion with you.