Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on February 19, 2011, 01:05:PM
-
Re-enactment of raid - Log details confirming attendance of support unit at scene prior to 9am...
08:50am - PC Watson and WPC Cummings, attending in CA04. 08:56 now cancelled support unit attending"
NEXT MESSAGE NOT RECORDED UNTIL 10:30am...
"10:30am - PC Tingey called required to attend scene, re draw plannings, ETA"...
-
Big gap in log, between 08:56am and 10 :30am...
-
Occupants of CA04 and support unit, key features in identifying group of additional officers who attended scene at 9am, to carry out re-enactment of raid with a view to identifying mistakes made by original group of firearms officers...
Why did Essex police seek to conceal identities of these additional officer's who attended the scene that morning?
Bit by bit, the truth about what took place at the scene that morning, is being reconstructed...
-
Who wrote that log?
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
So there's no point discussing this if you won't say who wrote the log and where it was written.
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
So there's no point discussing this if you won't say who wrote the log and where it was written.
------------------------
are you saying that a police officer did not write up the details of that log?
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
So there's no point discussing this if you won't say who wrote the log and where it was written.
------------------------
are you saying that a police officer did not write up the details of that log?
I don't recall saying that. I asked who wrote it - as in the name of the officer who wrote it.
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
So there's no point discussing this if you won't say who wrote the log and where it was written.
------------------------
are you saying that a police officer did not write up the details of that log?
I don't recall saying that. I asked who wrote it - as in the name of the officer who wrote it.
-----------------------------
Yes, I know - I will look in the files I have access to and retrieve that information as soon as I can. But for one reason or another, this officer forgot to mention the arrival of the support unit at 8:56am - rather conveniently, do you not think?
-
Who wrote that log?
-----------------------
Police officer at the scene, who was stationed at the forward control point - nobody could have got into the farmhouse without passing his position...
Which police officer and where exactly was he? You've only posted a snippet of it.
--------------------------------
Police officer concerned will be subject of criminal investigation, for falsifying log details, he knows who he is, and he has to be given the right to respond before he is prosecuted for perverting the course of justice...
So there's no point discussing this if you won't say who wrote the log and where it was written.
------------------------
are you saying that a police officer did not write up the details of that log?
I don't recall saying that. I asked who wrote it - as in the name of the officer who wrote it.
-----------------------------
Yes, I know - I will look in the files I have access to and retrieve that information as soon as I can. But for one reason or another, this officer forgot to mention the arrival of the support unit at 8:56am - rather conveniently, do you not think?
Yes, it's odd. Why was car CA4 cancelled?
-
Is there a full stop between 'cancelled. Support unit attending'?
-
Is there a full stop between 'cancelled. Support unit attending'?
It's a bit vague isn't it? It's not very good grammatically-speaking whichever way you look at it.
-
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
-
I haven't seen anything that proves 'support unit' means re-enactment. Even if it did, couldn't that mean a 'walkthrough'?
If there is one thing this scene needed, it was someone to follow the evidence and try to make real sense of who did what and when.
The 'suicide' muddied everything, and made for lazy 'don't need to prove anything' policing.
-
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------
On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?
-
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------
On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?
I don't know, but Jeremy seems to think that it's a significant issue. Time will tell I suppose.
-
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------
On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?
I don't know, but Jeremy seems to think that it's a significant issue. Time will tell I suppose.
------------------------------------
Yes, he has additional material connected to this matter (as do I) which cannot be posted for obvious reasons...