Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: BarefootDanC on September 08, 2025, 07:21:PM
-
From my point of view, being a guilter, it is a good thing that certain individuals, such as Mary Stratton and George Barwood, bring the Jeremy Bamber campaign into disrepute.
By harming the campaign, people are less likely to believe all the slander against the relatives and realise that Jeremy is where he belongs!
-
That Chris Roberts is a proper fruitcake.
-
That Chris Roberts is a proper weirdo.
Yep. Him too.
Mary and Chris club together.
A good example is their treatment of Andy Rigsby, author of the article posted here https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12641.0.html (https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12641.0.html)
As part of his research, Andy Rigsby wrote to Jeremy Bamber and received several replies.
Mary Stratton was adamant that this was untrue, as she claimed that she has a list of everyone who has ever written to Jeremy and he wasn't on the list, but this is a barefaced lie. Mr Rigsby was able to prove that he had been in correspondence with Jeremy by posting a copy of letters from him!
-
Yep. Him too.
Mary and Chris club together.
A good example is their treatment of Andy Rigsby, author of the article posted here https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12641.0.html (https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12641.0.html)
As part of his research, Andy Rigsby wrote to Jeremy Bamber and received several replies.
Mary Stratton was adamant that this was untrue, as she claimed that she has a list of everyone who has ever written to Jeremy and he wasn't on the list, but this is a barefaced lie. Mr Rigsby was able to prove that he had been in correspondence with Jeremy by posting a copy of letters from him!
But can we be 100% certain that Mary Stratton is actually in correspondence with JB? If she's prepared to tell one "bare faced lie" why not another?
-
From my point of view, being a guilter, it is a good thing that certain individuals, such as Mary Stratton and George Barwood, bring the Jeremy Bamber campaign into disrepute.
By harming the campaign, people are less likely to believe all the slander against the relatives and realise that Jeremy is where he belongs!
I have to agree with you on this. They are a dreadful pair and do a lot of harm. I have tried to raise the issue but nobody is prepared to reign them in.
-
Believe everyone is now waiting for this months Millbank audio.
It has been over a year since the New Yorker article. The Doc Maker said they refused to give the audio to the CCRC. Which is disappointing. But better late than never.
-
Burrell's WS says -
'At 6.09am this open line was linked up with our own '999' call line and was thereafter constantly monitored by PC Millbank'.
---------
Not sure how the CT worked out that meant Sheila rang 999 at 6.09am & said nothing.
It is similar to claiming Nevill called Chelmsford Police because of differences between two logs. One log was from West speaking to Bamber. The other was from Bonnett speaking to West.
Once the claims are made supporters will support it. But the CCRC will dismiss it.
-
I have to agree with you on this. They are a dreadful pair and do a lot of harm. I have tried to raise the issue but nobody is prepared to reign them in.
Are you in contact with George Barwood?
-
Are you in contact with George Barwood?
No.
-
No.
I could put you in contact with him, especially of you are on Facebook?
-
I could put you in contact with him, especially of you are on Facebook?
I am not sure what that would achieve. As admininstrator of his facebook page he seems happy with the posts made by the dreadful duo who dominate the site. They are abusive to supporters as well as guilters - anyone who does not share their narrative is a target. I will not post there now.
-
I am not sure what that would achieve. As admininstrator of his facebook page he seems happy with the posts made by the dreadful duo who dominate the site. They are abusive to supporters as well as guilters - anyone who does not share their narrative is a target. I will not post there now.
George Barwood banned me and blocked me from the FB site for arguing with Chris Roberts ( who then left weird messages on my FB business page) and I wasnt even arguing Jeremy's guilt on the particular point in contention with Chris Roberts. I was merely just highlighting an opinion on his point.
As said by others, a strange bunch and fruitcakes like this only cause harm to JB by being associated to him.
-
George Barwood banned me and blocked me from the FB site for arguing with Chris Roberts ( who then left weird messages on my FB business page) and I wasnt even arguing Jeremy's guilt on the particular point in contention with Chris Roberts. I was merely just highlighting an opinion on his point.
As said by others, a strange bunch and fruitcakes like this only cause harm to JB by being associated to him.
When was this?
-
George Barwood banned me and blocked me from the FB site for arguing with Chris Roberts ( who then left weird messages on my FB business page) and I wasnt even arguing Jeremy's guilt on the particular point in contention with Chris Roberts. I was merely just highlighting an opinion on his point.
As said by others, a strange bunch and fruitcakes like this only cause harm to JB by being associated to him.
I agree entirely.
-
I agree entirely.
It is good to see Adam's many posts in that group. He and I are thorns in their sides.