Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: handymanz on March 11, 2024, 09:20:PM
-
In a murder trial, you would expect the jury to be paying attention to the evidence. In Jeremy’s case he was convicted on a 10-2 majority verdict, he only needed one more juror to vote not guilty to be acquitted. Below shows concerns that a juror was asleep during proceedings!
Or would it have meant a hung Jury, requiring a subsequent re- trial.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIazXR5WEAE_0Gv?format=jpg&name=medium)
-
Or would it have meant a hung Jury, requiring a subsequent re- trial.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIazXR5WEAE_0Gv?format=jpg&name=medium)
I have seen reports of this in a post but have never seen this evidence before. If you search juror asleep you will find 12 references
-
So, it doesn't say he was asleep, even Rivlin didn't think he was asleep!
-
If he was nodding off only thing I could think would happen is a severe bollocking from the judge
-
If he was nodding off only thing I could think would happen is a severe bollocking from the judge
It doesn't say he was nodding off or asleep and even Bambers lawyer didn't think he was.
-
It's an old story: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=5014.0
-
It's an old story: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=5014.0
It is but it seems the story changed from a juror closing his eyes now and again, to he was definitely asleep. It doesn't seem like that was the case at all.