Jeremy Bamber Forum

JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: JackieD on October 09, 2021, 11:25:AM

Title: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: JackieD on October 09, 2021, 11:25:AM
Taken from the podcast

Ann Eaton went to White House Farm and took any jewellery she came across and moved pictures from the walls took money from Junes handbags and even stole £400 in cash for Neville’s wallet the items were loaded into And’s car and taken to Oak farm the home she shared with her husband Peter Eaton
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 12:26:PM
Because of their friendship with Ainsley, their guard dog.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 01:21:PM
Taken from the podcast

Ann Eaton went to White House Farm and took any jewellery she came across and moved pictures from the walls took money from Junes handbags and even stole £400 in cash for Neville’s wallet the items were loaded into And’s car and taken to Oak farm the home she shared with her husband Peter Eaton
Ann recalled that Jeremy then asked her, "Do you want to come and see the goodies?" They went upstairs to the master bedroom, where the floor was covered in heirlooms including the Meissen clock, chinaware, silver service cutlery, antique condiment sets and a candelabra. A suitcase filled with old sketches lay on the bed. Ann reminded him that the clock belonged to Sheila. "It's mine now," Jeremy replied. She asked if he was going to put it away. "No." he said, "when I come into this room I like to see nice things."

Almost ten years later, she recalled: "I haven't seen these items since." http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3958.0.html
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: JackieD on October 09, 2021, 01:27:PM
Ann recalled that Jeremy then asked her, "Do you want to come and see the goodies?" They went upstairs to the master bedroom, where the floor was covered in heirlooms including the Meissen clock, chinaware, silver service cutlery, antique condiment sets and a candelabra. A suitcase filled with old sketches lay on the bed. Ann reminded him that the clock belonged to Sheila. "It's mine now," Jeremy replied. She asked if he was going to put it away. "No." he said, "when I come into this room I like to see nice things."

Almost ten years later, she recalled: "I haven't seen these items since." http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3958.0.html


And your point ? Everything did belong to Jeremy. Ann Eaton was stealing money and property that did NOT belong to her

Do you agree Ann was a theif
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: David1819 on October 09, 2021, 01:27:PM
Ann recalled that Jeremy then asked her, "Do you want to come and see the goodies?" They went upstairs to the master bedroom, where the floor was covered in heirlooms including the Meissen clock, chinaware, silver service cutlery, antique condiment sets and a candelabra. A suitcase filled with old sketches lay on the bed. Ann reminded him that the clock belonged to Sheila. "It's mine now," Jeremy replied. She asked if he was going to put it away. "No." he said, "when I come into this room I like to see nice things."


Recalled? More like fabricated

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1931.msg59842.html#msg59842 (http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1931.msg59842.html#msg59842)
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: David1819 on October 09, 2021, 01:29:PM
Taken from the podcast

Ann Eaton went to White House Farm and took any jewellery she came across and moved pictures from the walls took money from Junes handbags and even stole £400 in cash for Neville’s wallet the items were loaded into And’s car and taken to Oak farm the home she shared with her husband Peter Eaton

Basil Cook gave them permission to. The CT have claimed that Ann told Basil that Jeremy said it was OK. If true its probably a lie.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 01:40:PM

And your point ? Everything did belong to Jeremy. Ann Eaton was stealing money and property that did NOT belong to her

Do you agree Ann was a theif
Ann took some of her mother's items back to Carbonells Farm, including some items of June of sentimental value. Jeremy had no right to any of the property until probate was granted.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 01:45:PM
Ann recalled that Jeremy then asked her, "Do you want to come and see the goodies?" They went upstairs to the master bedroom, where the floor was covered in heirlooms including the Meissen clock, chinaware, silver service cutlery, antique condiment sets and a candelabra. A suitcase filled with old sketches lay on the bed. Ann reminded him that the clock belonged to Sheila. "It's mine now," Jeremy replied. She asked if he was going to put it away. "No." he said, "when I come into this room I like to see nice things."

Almost ten years later, she recalled: "I haven't seen these items since." http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3958.0.html





AE was given the keys to WHF within days of the murders and whatever was around the place was taken for " safe-keeping " which would have included everything mentioned above.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 01:57:PM




AE was given the keys to WHF within days of the murders and whatever was around the place was taken for " safe-keeping " which would have included everything mentioned above.
Was this before or after Jeremy and Brett Collins loaded a van headed for Sotheby's..
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 01:59:PM
Was this before or after Jeremy and Brett Collins loaded a van headed for Sotheby's..





Before.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Adam on October 09, 2021, 02:09:PM
I thought AE handed the £400 to Basil Cock or the police.

Bamber went searching for it shortly afterwards. He would have certainly spent the next 36 years making a big fuss if he thought AE had taken it for herself.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 02:11:PM
I thought AE handed the £400 to Basil Cock or the police.

Bamber went searching for it shortly afterwards. He would have certainly spent the next 36 years making a big fuss if he thought AE had taken it for herself.




How strange then that he didn't take it on the night of the murders ? Afterall, he's been painted as greedy and grasping.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 02:13:PM



How strange then that he didn't take it on the night of the murders ? Afterall, he's been painted as greedy and grasping.
Not really so strange. He was going to come back for it shortly thereafter, and anyway he had already helped himself to more than double that amount with the Osea Road robbery.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Adam on October 09, 2021, 02:14:PM



How strange then that he didn't take it on the night of the murders ? Afterall, he's been painted as greedy and grasping.

You have actually made a valid point.

Suspect he just wanted to focus on the massacre & frame. Plenty of time later to remove items from WHF.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 02:20:PM
Not really so strange. He was going to come back for it shortly thereafter, and anyway he had already helped himself to more than double that amount with the Osea Road robbery.





He was going to go back for it ? You're kidding, surely ?
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 02:25:PM




He was going to go back for it ? You're kidding, surely ?
I mean after Police had entered and he had fed his false story to them and the relatives. It almost worked, didn't it?
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 03:37:PM
I mean after Police had entered and he had fed his false story to them and the relatives. It almost worked, didn't it?




Wasn't well hidden was it, under the mat  ::) Why didn't he take it with him ?
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 03:54:PM



Wasn't well hidden was it, under the mat  ::) Why didn't he take it with him ?
..because it would have looked too obvious.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 04:54:PM
..because it would have looked too obvious.





Like his dyed hair and dilated pupils ?
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 04:56:PM
Be aware of men who dye their hair black and who also have dilated pupils as they're murderers.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: Steve_uk on October 09, 2021, 05:29:PM
Be aware of men who dye their hair black and who also have dilated pupils as they're murderers.
Well the latter is a sure sign of cocaine use.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 06:17:PM
Well the latter is a sure sign of cocaine use.





Not necessarily. Pupils dilate for all sorts of reasons, the most common being a change of lighting. For instance going from light to dark as in sunshine one minute to indoors. Fear too can alter the pupils and of course medical conditions.
Title: Re: Why Wasn’t Ann and Peter Eaton Prosecuted
Post by: lookout on October 09, 2021, 06:18:PM
Don't forget that AE was going scatty looking for clues. I bet her own pupils were working overtime with excitement !!