Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Adam on July 07, 2021, 01:33:PM
-
Unlike all other theories from supporters, this is possible.
Julie's detailed WS may be correct. Except she omitted she ever encouraged Bamber. Instead her WS states such talk from Bamber upset her.
This explains the accuracy & volume of Julie's WS. Bamber can never say Julie encouraged him.
There is a slim chance Julie may have encouraged him during her 18 months with Bamber. It was probably more of a sympathetic ear when he was complaining about the raw deal he thought he had.
Julie may have sometimes been non responsive when he mentioned his massacre plans. Believing he wasn't serious.
If Julie dismissed Bamber's plans, that may have motivated him more. To prove her wrong.
It is doubtful Julie worked closely with Bamber & had to do much persuading. If she had wanted money she would have accepted June's offer of a free house.
-
JM's WS were nothing but bitter lies. On the one hand she'd say he was a joker but when it suited her----he wasn't joking at all and she twisted what he'd once joked about into something malicious.
How was it that she stayed with him as long as she did if she'd have thought his jokes were not jokes at all ? Wasn't she supposed to have been well-educated, street-wise and wary of men since being attacked in Paris before she met JB ? What was she doing in Paris ? Holidaying ? Or was that a lie ??
-
The judge said Bamber trusted Julie enough to involve her in the caravan break in. So may have trusted enough to involve her in the massacre. There is no doubt her WS is very watertight.
There is a possibility Julie directly/indirectly encouraged/motivated Bamber. Neither person will ever admit to this.
-
So " watertight " that nobody believes it ::)
-
So " watertight " that nobody believes it ::)
Even Bamber's lawyers said her WS couldn't be breached.
Supporters say the police gave her inside information. However if they were going to do that, they would have told her to remove MM.
-
Even Bamber's lawyers said her WS couldn't be breached.
Supporters say the police gave her inside information. However if they were going to do that, they would have told her to remove MM.
Was everything that JM supposedly said ever corroborated by other witnesses ?
-
Was everything that JM supposedly said ever corroborated by other witnesses ?
A lot was -
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6331.msg279608.html#msg279608
----------
A lot of information she could have only got from Bamber -
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10618.msg491403.html#msg491403
----------
-
There's no way I'd ever follow what you write !
-
There's no way I'd ever follow what you write !
You respond enough.
-
You respond enough.
Not to what you've written !