Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on May 01, 2021, 01:32:PM
-
There are common features, in the manner with which, cases like 'the case of Madeleine McCann', and 'The Bamber Case' regarding who shot, who in/at the time of the whf tragedy!
-
What, are these features?
-
What, are these features?
Well, it doesn't matter whether or not, the tactic to be adopted/implemented, was/is intended to prosecute a person, or a number of different people, or by the same token, a deliberate intent to disguise the true involvement of someone who was/is involved, but is/can be presented as a victim, a bystander, or a prosecution witness, 'intent on casting doubt on a suspect/the defendant/ or the accused' because of some factor or other, which displaces the actual time when the crime was/ or could have been committed!
In the 'Madeleine McCann case', there was/is an obvious displacement regarding the date/time that the victim, went missing!
Similarly, in 'the Bamber' case, there was/has been a number of events which have thus far served to displace, any realistic opportunity to get 'to the truth of the matter', involving a number of different parts of the evidence, rendering it ineffective, or hard to challenge! One of the most significant features which has served to achieve this stance, involves the circumstances of the phone calls, recorded as having occurred at 3.26am (Neville Bamber to the police), and 3.36am (Jeremy Bamber to the police)! The key to understanding where the truth in this particular matter, is taking into account the duration of either call, from 3.26am, to 3.48am (lasting 22 minutes, or so), or from 3.36am to 3.48am (a call which only lasted some 12 minutes),when everyone is in agreement that Jeremy Bamber left his cottage to go to the family farmhouse, as he was advised to by PC West', at the same time that the occupants of police patrol car (call sign, 'CA/07') arrived at whf!
Essex police and the CPS, manipulated the actual truth of the timing of the two phone calls, by making out a false case, that there was/ had only been one call, not two separate ones! In addition, the additional phone call that ' Jeremy Bamber' made to his girlfriend at 3.30am, was altered so that that call occurred earlier (3.15am, 3.10am, or 3.00am) by witness statements obtained from 'other lodgers' !icing in bedsits where 'Julie Mugford also resided, invariably influenced by 'DS Jones' who set out to prove that 'Jeremy Bamber' was lying about the timing of his call to the police, and 'Julie Mugfords'. This tactic, would be used during the interviewing of ''Jeremy Bamber' by 'DS Jones', who accused 'Bamber' of giving two conflicting accounts regarding the sequence with which he telephoned police, and telephoning his girlfriend, 'Julie Mugford'. 'Jones', accused 'Bamber, of telling police that he called 'Julie Mugfords', after he had phoned police, but that in his 'September 85' police interview, 'he was saying that he had made that call to his girlfriend, 'before' he had spoken to the police'! However, we now know that 'Jeremy Bamber' made an attempt to call the police at 'Witham police station', at a time when there weren't any police officers Manning that station - the police were out on a local industrial estate, responding to a burglar/intruder alarm which had been activated and required immediate attention! Of course, although Jeremy Bamber' had attempted to make a call to Witham, no-one answered because no-one was there to answer his call! He then telephoned 'Julie Mugford' (at 3.30am), and told her, that 'there was something wrong at home' (the farmhouse). Afterwards, he then telephoned the police at Chelmsford a call which is recorded as having commenced, at 3.36am lasting until after 'PC West' spoke to the operator, requesting her to check the telephone line of the farmhouse (this was recorded as having occurred at 3.42am). It is understood that 'Jeremy' received a dry brief telephone call, from his father ('Neville Bamber') at some time prior to 3.26am, in which 'Neville' said words to the effect, 'Jeremy', 'Come Quickly', 'Sheila has got the gun and has gone crazy' (when the connection was mysteriously ended/cut short, 'Jeremy' described what had taken place, at the point of that call being terminated (the line going dead)! So, he then tried to telephone his father back, but kept getting a repetitive, 'engaged tone' which caused him to suspect that his father was busy talking to someone else on the phone!
It was then, that 'Jeremy' decided to call his girlfriend, 'Julie Mugford' and told her that 'there was something wrong at home' (the farmhouse). This call took place at around 3.30am, and minutes later, 'Jeremy made his own call to the police, timed at 3.36am!
Prior to 'Jeremy' making 'the/his' 3.36am call to 'PC West', in the control roomat Chelmsford police Headquarters, the absent (earlier) Witham police officers ['Bews', 'Saxby'] received a telephone call from the control room instructing them to go immediately to the scene of 'a possible ongoing shooting incident' at Whitehouse Farm'. This call must have been received by the occupants of 'CA/07' prior to 3.35am, because by that time, the occupants of that patrol car. Was heading toward the incident at 'white house Farm',(a minute before 'Jeremy' called the police!
The 'whereabouts' of 'PC Myall' at this time, are/were 'not very clear' since patrol car 'CA/07' and it's occupants did not arrive at the scene until 8.48am, that morning. The arrival of 'PC Myall' to the scene must have occurred sooner, since listed first in a document ['major incident project'] is recorded the fact that 'PC Myall' had seen 'an unidentified man' at Whitehouse Farm', timed at/as '03.45am'!
-
YOU WOULD KNOW MIKE YOU HAVE BEEN ARRESTED AND IMPRISONED SO MANY TIMES FOR THINGS YOU CLAIM YOU NEVER DID...YOU SHOULD NOW COME CLEAN TELL THE TRUTH,YOURE 66 AND YOU FIB LIKE A CHILD .....BE A GOOD LITTLE BOY...
-
YOU WOULD KNOW MIKE YOU HAVE BEEN ARRESTED AND IMPRISONED SO MANY TIMES FOR THINGS YOU CLAIM YOU NEVER DID...YOU SHOULD NOW COME CLEAN TELL THE TRUTH,YOURE 66 AND YOU FIB LIKE A CHILD .....BE A GOOD LITTLE BOY...
I was only arrested because of people like you (who you claim was an accomplice of mine), but funnily enough, the CPS made out the case that I was a lone offender! So, pinocchio, how does what you are saying fit into and with that scenario?
Surely. If I had committed such offences, and you are bragging that you were my accomplice, then why wasn't you arrested, interviewed and put on trial along with me you humpty? But, if you are so insistent, it's never to late for you to be arrested, interviewed and charged, convicted and sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment, I could be a defence witness on your behalf and tell the truth regarding the fact that I have never committed any burglaries with you, or South Yorkshire police, as my accomplices!
How many other innocent victims have you and South Yorkshire Police put in the frame for offences they have not/did not commit!
Hey, that was a silly move, you pleading 'not guilty' to being involved in tge retired judges burglary in Derbyshire, when cops said/stated they arrested you leaving the burgalled premises, wasn't it?
How on earth can anybody believe anything a low life scumbag like you had to say about anything?
Even the appellate court commented upon the fact that you misled the crown court, and the jury at trial, by not only pleading 'Not Guilty', but also that you refused to give an explanation as to why you wasn't, or hadn't been there!
You 'Thick Cunt'!!!
-
if i had plead guilty mike....do you really think you and youre bullshit maps etc ..etc..gun bollocks etc..would have resulted in you being found not guilty...lol..never in a million yrs...you got nicked for that and the others cos you WAS GUILTYY OF ALL COUNTS ...gt.