Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Roch on May 30, 2020, 11:01:PM
-
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeremy-bamber-murder-detective-destroyed-22112474
-
The Crown are refuting that the documents were not previously disclosed.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/jeremy-bamber-white-house-farm-high-court-murder-challenge-a4454916.html
-
If there was nothing to hide in the documents that the CPS refute were not disclosed, then just disclose them again. For the sake of the cost incurred for a bit of retrieval and scanning by some admin staff, the authorities would rather pay a renouned QC and argue the case instead?
-
"She added that the CCRC had previously “looked extremely extensively at the issue of whether or not there was a second sound moderator” and said Bamber was “tribunal shopping to avoid going back to the CCRC”."
Who can blame him? :-\
-
'The senior investigating officer in the 1985 White House Farm murders destroyed evidence in his own home, a court heard.'
----------
How would anyone know Ainsley did this 35 years ago?
-
'The senior investigating officer in the 1985 White House Farm murders destroyed evidence in his own home, a court heard.'
----------
How would anyone know Ainsley did this 35 years ago?
2010 is mentioned - which is puzzling, as I understand Ainsley retired after one of the appeals.
-
2010 is mentioned - which is puzzling, as I understand Ainsley retired after one of the appeals.
I bet he did
-
Would " this evidence " have anything to do with the late " Taff " Jones's logs etc ?
-
Would " this evidence " have anything to do with the late " Taff " Jones's logs etc ?
I doubt it.
-
I doubt it.
Where are all " Taff's " notes anyway ?