Jeremy Bamber Forum

OTHER HIGH PROFILE CASES => Luke Mitchell and the murder of Jodi Jones => Topic started by: nugnug on October 19, 2019, 09:18:PM

Title: why did the police think the crime was a sex atack
Post by: nugnug on October 19, 2019, 09:18:PM
what reason would the police  have for thinking that.
Title: Re: why did the police think the crime was a sex atack
Post by: Caroline on October 19, 2019, 09:25:PM
Quote from: nugnug on October 19, 2019, 09:18:PM
what reason would the police  have for thinking that.

Probably because she was found naked. It's a reasonable assumption until tests were done.
Title: Re: why did the police think the crime was a sex atack
Post by: nugnug on October 19, 2019, 09:36:PM
Quote from: Caroline on October 19, 2019, 09:25:PM
Probably because she was found naked. It's a reasonable assumption until tests were done.

thats a good point but they were saying it for a fair while so i think there must of been more rason than that.
Title: Re: why did the police think the crime was a sex atack
Post by: sandra L on October 19, 2019, 10:18:PM
She was found naked, with sperm heads and semen deposits on her clothing and body, murdered in what was originally described as a "frenzied" attack.

Her body left with her mutilated breast on display for whoever found her, her hands tied behind her back with her own trousers.

The investigating team dropped the "potentially sexually motivated attack" approach after the first DNA results were returned.

All of the original evidence available to them suggested a sexually motivated attack. The big question is, why did they drop that line of reasoning when the developing evidence supported it?