1
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by ngb1066 on Today at 10:01 AM »And cursing daily the Army reject from Colchester Barracks he employed to do the deed for getting off scot-free.
What do you mean by that?
Recent Posts
What do you mean by that?
2
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Mary Mugford's husband
« Last post by Hardy Boy on Today at 07:57 AM »You need to read the paragraph. Clearly it isn't just the view of one member he is referring to.I always remember this statement from David Connett a journalist at the trial Roch
He did establish that she (Julie Mugford) went to the police after Bamber had upset her by ending the relationship. Personally, I couldn't understand how she could be relied upon as a witness, but others, particularly women, thought the contradictions in her evidence made her more compelling.
Julie Mugford would not have been a credible witness in my view Roch, if true, she knew of his plans she knew of his involvement in it, and she chose to cover for him, either way, depending how you look at things, she’s a guilty party in this by her own admission and she did it because he had jilted her.
3
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by Curiosity on Today at 07:56 AM »He will walk one day in either an alive or dead capacity.And cursing daily the Army reject from Colchester Barracks he employed to do the deed for getting off scot-free.
Kudos to Jeremy to not losing his sanity and keeping a level head to fight for almost 40 years.
4
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by ILB on Yesterday at 07:48 PM »And there was I, thinking you were on the fence.
He will walk one day in either an alive or dead capacity.
Kudos to Jeremy to not losing his sanity and keeping a level head to fight for almost 40 years.
5
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Mary Mugford's husband
« Last post by Roch on Yesterday at 07:33 PM »
A sweeping statement, that! I have serious doubts about the entire jury not finding Julie credible, especially as it's the opinion of just "one jury member".
You need to read the paragraph. Clearly it isn't just the view of one member he is referring to.
6
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Mary Mugford's husband
« Last post by Jane on Yesterday at 06:23 PM »They didn't, according to one jury member who voted guilty.
A sweeping statement, that! I have serious doubts about the entire jury not finding Julie credible, especially as it's the opinion of just "one jury member".
7
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Mary Mugford's husband
« Last post by Roch on Yesterday at 05:59 PM »Jurors are human and I believe found JM very credible.
They didn't, according to one jury member who voted guilty.
8
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by Adam on Yesterday at 04:56 PM »It would be a surprise if people as rich as Nevill/June did not have a washing machine.
9
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by Curiosity on Yesterday at 04:52 PM »https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co8411370/deluxe-washing-machine-9900It was probably an older top-loader, hence the plain white front and control panel on top towards the rear like these -
Doesn't look like a 1985 washing machine.
https://www.google.com/search?q=top+loader+washing+machine&client=firefox-b-d&sca_esv=c29d84b229fa45c6&udm=2&biw=1704&bih=886&ei=9-feZ5DAGIaBhbIP1aex0QY&oq=top+loader&gs_lp=EgNpbWciCnRvcCBsb2FkZXIqAggBMg0QABiABBixAxhDGIoFMgoQABiABBhDGIoFMgoQABiABBhDGIoFMgoQABiABBhDGIoFMgsQABiABBixAxiDATIKEAAYgAQYQxiKBTIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgARI70dQsQ1YyRJwAXgAkAEAmAFuoAGzBaoBAzYuMrgBAcgBAPgBAZgCAqAC1QHCAgYQABgHGB6YAwCIBgGSBwMxLjGgB_UesgcDMS4xuAfVAQ&sclient=img#vhid=FSNbzTt-6z6frM&vssid=mosaic
https://trevorhowsam.com/thb933-washing-machine-servis-top-loading/
The loading lid in the grainy photo is hard to see, but it's definitely not a dishwasher.
10
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: the-doc-maker blog.
« Last post by Adam on Yesterday at 04:40 PM »A washing machine at WHF would only be useful if he was aiming to ring the police within 20 minutes of ringing his cottage from WHF.
He could shower, change & wash his clothes at WHF before ringing his cottage.
However the long gap between ringing Julie & the police shows he did not attempt a 20 minute turn around.
He could shower, change & wash his clothes at WHF before ringing his cottage.
However the long gap between ringing Julie & the police shows he did not attempt a 20 minute turn around.