Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
General / Re: Auditors And News Of The Day
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 02, 2025, 12:41:PM »
What’s betting, Terrorist/Asylum or just a conspiracy?   Counter Terrorism Policing have been called in to support the probe as cops investigate the full circumstances of the harrowing attack.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37191906/horror-multiple-people-stabbed-train-huntington/
So it looks like it’s not terrorist related or Asylum?    Two British nationals held over train stabbing as police say no suggestion attack terror-related




 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cm2zvjx1z14t


92
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by BarefootDanC on November 02, 2025, 09:23:AM »
DNearly half the British workforce work from home, I would say it creates a happier and less stressful employee with higher productivity.  Having an employee work from home lets the CCRC pick the right candidates for the job from all over the UK instead of a drive away to the Birmingham office? 

I don’t agree with you that they do nothing!  They might work really hard for all you know.

I concur with that. I work from home 3 days a week and work from the office the other two. Its cuts the stress of commuting considerably.

If the CCRC did not allow staff to work from home, they would only be able to recruit staff local to Birmingham.
93
General / Re: Auditors And News Of The Day
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 02, 2025, 08:00:AM »
What’s betting, Terrorist/Asylum or just a conspiracy?   Counter Terrorism Policing have been called in to support the probe as cops investigate the full circumstances of the harrowing attack.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37191906/horror-multiple-people-stabbed-train-huntington/

94
General / Re: Auditors And News Of The Day
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 02, 2025, 07:56:AM »
I don’t blame Steve one bit for wanting to get away from Manchester.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37191795/halloween-brawl-youtuber-playboy-bunnies/
95
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 02, 2025, 06:38:AM »
 D
They work at home doing no investigative work, doing next to nothing, but they have massive powers if only they would use them.

It was plainly obvious there was serious doubt about Andrews's case only 3 years after conviction and the CCRC reviewer did nothing. If only the police had fully disclosed he would never have been convicted in the first place.

The system is rotten, to scared to admit when a conviction is wrong.
Nearly half the British workforce work from home, I would say it creates a happier and less stressful employee with higher productivity.  Having an employee work from home lets the CCRC pick the right candidates for the job from all over the UK instead of a drive away to the Birmingham office? 

I don’t agree with you that they do nothing!  They might work really hard for all you know. 



96
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Rob_ on November 01, 2025, 10:44:PM »
What do you think they’re doing? It’s ok for someone without any knowledge to judge, Some are part time, and The average workload of investigators at the troubled miscarriage of justice watchdog has more than doubled since 2010 and, in at least one case, was closer to four times the average, according to new data obtained under a freedom of information request. Fifteen years ago case review managers had on average 12.5 cases; but according to the latest figures from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the average caseworker is now managing 25 cases. The highest number of cases allocated to a single worker in January this year was 45. 

The CCRC said that ‘the numbers given alone do not do anything to describe the diverse portfolio case review managers may have – for example, one might have 40 simple cases whereas another might have 12 complex cases resulting in similar workload, but different portfolio sizes’. As of January 2025, the commission has 39 case handlers (including nine part-time) and 50 case reviewers.

It was awful for Andrew and what he went through,  I do agree the CCRC needs an overall, but without the proper funding and the vast increase in Staff, nothing will change. I think it lacks expertise in some important fields, like forensics pathology ETC, which the Guardian touched on,  it’s ok having legal knowledge but I think they should invest more in this area?

They work at home doing no investigative work, doing next to nothing, but they have massive powers if only they would use them.

It was plainly obvious there was serious doubt about Andrews's case only 3 years after conviction and the CCRC reviewer did nothing. If only the police had fully disclosed he would never have been convicted in the first place.

The system is rotten, to scared to admit when a conviction is wrong.
97
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 01, 2025, 10:09:PM »
The CCRC has what around 90 staff what are they doing?

In Andrew Malkinson's case they were going to reject a third time even when they knew of compelling DNA evidence it's beyond a joke. If the police had fully disclosed the case would not have even got to trial.

Obviously I don't like seeing people abusing the system.
What do you think they’re doing? It’s ok for someone without any knowledge to judge, Some are part time, and The average workload of investigators at the troubled miscarriage of justice watchdog has more than doubled since 2010 and, in at least one case, was closer to four times the average, according to new data obtained under a freedom of information request. Fifteen years ago case review managers had on average 12.5 cases; but according to the latest figures from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the average caseworker is now managing 25 cases. The highest number of cases allocated to a single worker in January this year was 45. 

The CCRC said that ‘the numbers given alone do not do anything to describe the diverse portfolio case review managers may have – for example, one might have 40 simple cases whereas another might have 12 complex cases resulting in similar workload, but different portfolio sizes’. As of January 2025, the commission has 39 case handlers (including nine part-time) and 50 case reviewers.

It was awful for Andrew and what he went through,  I do agree the CCRC needs an overall, but without the proper funding and the vast increase in Staff, nothing will change. I think it lacks expertise in some important fields, like forensics pathology ETC, which the Guardian touched on,  it’s ok having legal knowledge but I think they should invest more in this area?


98
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Rob_ on November 01, 2025, 09:21:PM »
You only have to look at Simon Hall, protesting his innocence through a Campaign team, he had a massive Campaign by activists,  the CCRC  referred his case but the Court of Appeal rejected, he later confessed and killed himself. A waste of resources for the CCRC, driven purely by lies,  His case was said to have gravely undermined the claims of many prisoners who claim their innocence and embarrassed miscarriage of justice activists, having proved that they had campaigned for a guilty man.


 you also have to also feel sorry for the victims family having to be put through this sort of thing.  No one ever thinks about these, imagine your family member that’s been killed and there are idiots coming up with nonsense and the distress it causes them.  imagine the family who’s daughter (she was just 13) sexually assaulted by a sex offender and then he appeals his sentence just for face save,  these poor people never get the chance to move on.

The CCRC has what around 90 staff what are they doing?

In Andrew Malkinson's case they were going to reject a third time even when they knew of compelling DNA evidence it's beyond a joke. If the police had fully disclosed the case would not have even got to trial.

Obviously I don't like seeing people abusing the system.



99
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 01, 2025, 07:38:PM »
Im not sticking up for them and I’ve said it before, but they are limited by their resources, they get roughly 1500/1600 cases to look at each year, now imagine just Bambers case which has the number of points raised  to look into,  then take the scope needed to investigate just the Aga burn theory none sense, you can replace them with a new organisation, but, unless they get the resources and funded needed it will just be the same.

  I know a sex offender who pleaded guilty, he served 4 months of a 8 month prison sentence, when he came out he applied to the CCRC to look into his case, not because he was innocent but because he thought his sentence was too long. He lost, but It clogs the system up, this would have took someone off a more serious and proper MOJ case to look into other than his trying to save face, he did it just to brag that he had appealed.
You only have to look at Simon Hall, protesting his innocence through a Campaign team, he had a massive Campaign by activists,  the CCRC  referred his case but the Court of Appeal rejected, he later confessed and killed himself. A waste of resources for the CCRC, driven purely by lies,  His case was said to have gravely undermined the claims of many prisoners who claim their innocence and embarrassed miscarriage of justice activists, having proved that they had campaigned for a guilty man.


 you also have to also feel sorry for the victims family having to be put through this sort of thing.  No one ever thinks about these, imagine your family member that’s been killed and there are idiots coming up with nonsense and the distress it causes them.  imagine the family who’s daughter (she was just 13) sexually assaulted by a sex offender and then he appeals his sentence just for face save,  these poor people never get the chance to move on.
100
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: DocMaker article on Milbank
« Last post by Hardy Boy on November 01, 2025, 07:22:PM »
The CCRC don't do anything as far as I can see? They just look to reject, they have massive powers which they never use.

They are not fit for purpose and hopefully will be replaced by another organisation soon.
Im not sticking up for them and I’ve said it before, but they are limited by their resources, they get roughly 1500/1600 cases to look at each year, now imagine just Bambers case which has the number of points raised  to look into,  then take the scope needed to investigate just the Aga burn theory none sense, you can replace them with a new organisation, but, unless they get the resources and funded needed it will just be the same.

  I know a sex offender who pleaded guilty, he served 4 months of a 8 month prison sentence, when he came out he applied to the CCRC to look into his case, not because he was innocent but because he thought his sentence was too long. He lost, but It clogs the system up, this would have took someone off a more serious and proper MOJ case to look into other than his trying to save face, he did it just to brag that he had appealed.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]