The CCRC has what around 90 staff what are they doing?
In Andrew Malkinson's case they were going to reject a third time even when they knew of compelling DNA evidence it's beyond a joke. If the police had fully disclosed the case would not have even got to trial.
Obviously I don't like seeing people abusing the system.
What do you think they’re doing? It’s ok for someone without any knowledge to judge, Some are part time, and The average workload of investigators at the troubled miscarriage of justice watchdog has more than doubled since 2010 and, in at least one case, was closer to four times the average, according to new data obtained under a freedom of information request. Fifteen years ago case review managers had on average 12.5 cases; but according to the latest figures from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the average caseworker is now managing 25 cases. The highest number of cases allocated to a single worker in January this year was 45.
The CCRC said that ‘the numbers given alone do not do anything to describe the diverse portfolio case review managers may have – for example, one might have 40 simple cases whereas another might have 12 complex cases resulting in similar workload, but different portfolio sizes’. As of January 2025, the commission has 39 case handlers (including nine part-time) and 50 case reviewers.
It was awful for Andrew and what he went through, I do agree the CCRC needs an overall, but without the proper funding and the vast increase in Staff, nothing will change. I think it lacks expertise in some important fields, like forensics pathology ETC, which the Guardian touched on, it’s ok having legal knowledge but I think they should invest more in this area?