Author Topic: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones  (Read 197835 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #195 on: June 19, 2019, 05:24:PM »
thers at least 4 people who should of seen the body if it was there david dickie john ferris Gordon dickie and james a falconer

mean the body wasnt there when they were or they did see it and for some reason chose to ignore it.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2019, 07:33:PM by nugnug »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #196 on: June 20, 2019, 02:44:PM »
Not true. Entirely possible to be on the path without seeing the body. Also plenty of room to get to where JF left his condom without being anywhere near the body despite Sandra claiming he had to "STEP OVER IT"  ::)

And who says dickie and fung were over the wall? DD certainly wasn't. A witness said they seen the bike parked at the break in the wall which would be impossible to tell from a car.

in broad daylight how could you not spot all that blood.

Offline Bullseye

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #197 on: June 20, 2019, 03:30:PM »
Sounds about right to me considering Luke and Jodi were spotted arguing on Jodi's side of the path at around 16:55 (which ties in with the time Jodi left her house and the few minutes to get to the path entrance and also the time Shane just couldn't agree that Luke was in the house) and the time to walk to the wall and climb over and the argument to escalate. Luke was then spotted by boys who knew him from school alone at his end of the path acting suspicious from about 17:40 - 18:00. Where he phoned Alan Ovens to pretend he was waiting for Jodi. AO ofcourse told him Jodi's left to meet you. Luke said "ok cool" even though his last text from Jodi was almost an hour ago saying she was leaving, he didn't raise this with AO... also later told his friends Jodi won't be coming out; she's grounded. Why would he say that?  AO already told him Jodi had left... Why would he go home that night and never wonder what happened to Jodi and why she stood him up?

edit: no idea how Corrine confirming from work that Luke was at home burning dinner while Shane was having a wank in an empty house fits in to any of this.
 
Luke's friends who hung about with him that night in the woods all believe he done it. Ask yourself why?


It's all so obvious. And to think he almost got away with it.

Sorry but this is the sort of statements that get me annoyed, there is nothing you have said that is fact, but it’s made out to all be fact

Jodi and Luke were not spotted arguing, 2 people who might have been them spotted at top of path

Luke was spotted by 2 boys that knew him, but as far as I know they did not say he was acting suspicious (I’m sure Sandra can confirm on that tho), also this is meant to be only minutes after he carried out this bloodied murder, just sitting at the end of his street, Seems very unlikely to me. we do not know what ao said, even he was not sure, he did say she had already left but we do not know he said that she left to meet him. Luke said he then waited longer for her she did not turn up so he told him mum where he would be, met him mates and said Jodi wasn’t coming, may have been grounded. They were 14, why would he be worried she did not turn up, when I was 14 if my mate / bf did not turn up I’d just think something happened to stop them coming, certainly would not be worried.

The text from Jodi to Luke did not say she was leaving then to meet him, nobody knows what the text said apart from Luke and Jodi.

How do you know Luke’s friends he was with that night thought he done it, out of interest, was that in there statements?

Offline Bullseye

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #198 on: June 20, 2019, 03:52:PM »
I did not know it was a frozen pie, that’s would take over 30mins to burn I would think unless heat was up too high. Luke made the tea most nights so unlikely he had the heat to high, sounds like he had a good idea how to cook (better than me anyway lol ). If tea was ready for 1715 - 1720 I don’t see enough time for the pie to burn if it was in at 1650.

Offline Bullseye

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #199 on: June 20, 2019, 04:01:PM »
Someone had to have made the tea that night, it was not Shane or his mum according to their statements, but they both remember the burnt pie I believe. I always thought the pie might have been burnt as Luke had put it in to cook but was not there to take it out. Ie told his mum he put the pie in to cook and then went out, when him mum got home the pie was burnt.

Really depends if Shane remembers seeing Luke when he went to get his tea, I’ve heard both he did see him and he didn’t so I’ve never been clear on that.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #200 on: June 20, 2019, 04:06:PM »
I don't have time to address the mass of misinformation Lithium has posted here tonight - it'll have to wait until Monday.

Luke called his mum's work at either 4.15 or 4.25pm (I'll have to check the phone logs to confirm which one) to ask what to cook for tea. There's no requirement for store bought pies to be defrosted - they're usually cooked from frozen and take around 30 - 45 minutes to cook - if Luke put the pies in the oven after the phone call to his mum, they'd be ready for 5.15pm - maybe he put them on the top shelf instead of the middle, or maybe he set the temperature a bit too high.


Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #201 on: June 20, 2019, 04:10:PM »
No one said in court that they saw Luke at the Easthouses end of the path, in-fact it was the opposite. No one saw him at the crime scene or wherever it was he managed to clean himself up. The bike was spotted by the tool place employees, ones that were getting harassed by it that afternoon so would have known the bike. That bike places them at the crime scene. No one else is placed there.

Falconer by his own statement not Sandra’s claim the route he took meant he would have had to have stepped over the body.

Dickie snr claimed he was there and went over so again he can be placed at the crime scene, Luke can’t.


Offline Bullseye

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #202 on: June 20, 2019, 04:21:PM »
Thanks Sandra, I had read somewhere recently he spoke to his mum around 1650 to find out what was for tea, if it was 1620/1630 that’s plenty time to cook and even burn a pie.

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #203 on: June 20, 2019, 04:52:PM »
Quote
And who says dickie and fung were over the wall? DD certainly wasn't

I’m curious as to your claim the Dickie certainly didn’t go over , if Dickie has told you that then it suggests you know where they went when not with the bike.! It also suggests that Ferris did! We know Jodi smoked cannabis that evening was she there to buy it off Ferris?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #204 on: June 20, 2019, 05:16:PM »
Not true. Entirely possible to be on the path without seeing the body. Also plenty of room to get to where JF left his condom without being anywhere near the body despite Sandra claiming he had to "STEP OVER IT"  ::)

And who says dickie and fung were over the wall? DD certainly wasn't. A witness said they seen the bike parked at the break in the wall which would be impossible to tell from a car.

how would you that  were yu on there.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #205 on: June 20, 2019, 05:26:PM »
Not true. Entirely possible to be on the path without seeing the body. Also plenty of room to get to where JF left his condom without being anywhere near the body despite Sandra claiming he had to "STEP OVER IT"  ::)

And who says dickie and fung were over the wall? DD certainly wasn't. A witness said they seen the bike parked at the break in the wall which would be impossible to tell from a car.

so if a murder was going on at the exact same time they were on the path wouldent they have haerd it very few murder happen in comlete silence.

wouldent they have heard her scream.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2019, 05:52:PM by nugnug »

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #206 on: June 20, 2019, 07:06:PM »
The bike was spotted by the tool place employees, ones that were getting harassed by it that afternoon so would have known the bike. That bike places them at the crime scene. No one else is placed there.

Falconer by his own statement not Sandra’s claim the route he took meant he would have had to have stepped over the body.

Dickie snr claimed he was there and went over so again he can be placed at the crime scene, Luke can’t.

Ferris and Dickie admitted their bike was against the wall without them and they agreed that fact in court - just couldn't remember where they went when they left it there!

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #207 on: June 20, 2019, 07:44:PM »
Ferris and Dickie admitted their bike was against the wall without them and they agreed that fact in court - just couldn't remember where they went when they left it there!

well they couldent of gone far i mean you wouldent want to leave it there long it might get stolen.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2019, 07:46:PM by nugnug »

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #208 on: June 20, 2019, 07:52:PM »
Thanks Sandra, I had read somewhere recently he spoke to his mum around 1650 to find out what was for tea, if it was 1620/1630 that’s plenty time to cook and even burn a pie.

Something I'm finding quite interesting. Firstly, 16.50 is the time Jodi is (finally) claimed to have left her mother's house - it changed from 17.30 to 17.00, to 16.50.

Luke spoke to his mum before 16.30 and therefore before the exchange of texts between his and Judith's phones at 16.34 - 16.38 and he called the speaking clock at 16.54.

His mum came home at 17.15, according to all three of the Mitchell family, and dinner was ready (This time is also supported by CCTV of Corinne leaving her work, stopping in at a local shop and reconstruction timings of the journey between the three places.)

Now, there's someone on youtube claiming Luke was still at home, cooking dinner, when he called Alan Ovens at 17.40, meaning he would have to have spent over an hour and a quarter cooking pies in the oven, by which time they'd have been burnt to a crisp!!!

I see this often - a large influx of misleading posting, using known timings but attributing them to other events to cause confusion, changing details from one known event and claiming it belongs to another and so on. I used to try to correct every example - not any more - I'd never have time to do anything else.

But since we have at least one poster who seems keen to extend the length of time for cooking some pies in the oven, I wonder what people make of the fact that the lasagne Judith claimed to be cooking that afternoon took 5 hours, at least, to cook? All of this focus on the 45 minute period in which Luke and his mother said pies were in the oven, yet no-one seems remotely interested in the development of the lasagne story, the timing of which, it seems, is to give an alibi for Joseph's movements that day.

Here's the final version:

Between 12:00 and 13:00 Judith was cooking the mince for the lasagne when Joseph and Ferris arrived at lunchtime (somewhere between 12 and 1).

15:50 - 15:55 Judith was preparing the sauce for the lasagne when Jodi came in from school (15.50ish) and Joseph was "mooching" around the kitchen, eating the mince. (This is just 25 minutes after the cancelled doctor's appointment to allow Joseph and Ferris to continue smoking cannabis - Judith would later say she didn't know what time Ferris left).

16:40 She and Alan Ovens sat in the living room for about half an hour after he came in from work, listening to cds and waiting for the lasagne to cook. Joseph was up in his room. (But Judith said Joseph was in the living room with her and Jodi listening to the Rod Stewart track when AO got in from work at 16.40). Jodi called out "keep some (lasagne) for me" as she left at 16.50

17:38 When Luke called  - Alan Ovens took the call because Judith was in the kitchen making the cheese sauce for the lasagne and assembling it ready to put it in the oven, so they couldn't have been sitting in the living room between 16.50 and 17.20 "waiting for the lasagne to cook" as claimed above. It took about 10 minutes to make the sauce and assemble, she put it in the oven for about 20 minutes, then told AO to put it back on for another 5 minutes, twice. Then they called Joseph down for tea which they either all ate together on their laps, all ate sitting at the table (including Jodi), or which Joseph took to his room to eat while Judith and AO ate in the living room.

18:05 - Either way, Joseph was back in his room when Judith and AO left to visit the cemetery just as the six o'clock news headlines came on. But if the lasagne didn't go into the oven until 17.48 (allowing for the 10 mins prep) and it was cooked for at least 30 minutes before being served, the they couldn't even have started eating it until 18.28 - almost half an hour after they claimed they left to visit the cemetery.

I'm not saying there's anything "suspicious" about the cooking arrangements in the Jones household that day - I'm asking why known timings for the Mitchells, which are proven to be supportive of their claims about that afternoon are under such scrutiny, when such unsupported and extremely unlikely timings for the Jones family are glibly ignored?

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones
« Reply #209 on: June 20, 2019, 07:54:PM »
well they couldent of gone far i mean you wouldent want to leave it there long it might get stolen.

Ferris knew all about stolen bikes, nugnug! He told police about a bike he'd "found" (in someone's garden) that somehow became his (Ferris's) bike. Guess it's ok if you find something to just keep it - even if you find it in someone's private property?