Ralph Bambers firearms and Shotgun Certificates (Essex Police)...

[mike tesko]

He said that he took the rifle home as he was going to be attending a shoot.But it would not have been legal to do that either,would it?

It would not have been legal, as he was only permitted to use the rifle at WHF.

I'd be very surprised if the firearm was actually taken away from WHF especially if Nevill was aware of it. I just can't imagine
a law abiding Magistrate like Nevill allowing it in any shape or form. The certificate was issued for WHF and nowhere else and
I'm sure Nevill would of played by the rules (after all it was Nevill's Firearms licence and nobody else's to lose). Anthony
Pargeter's insistence that his weapon was  not at WHF on the night of the murders troubles me, especially when you examine
interview evidence which confirms he changed his story on this point (Mike may be able to help if anyone wants to see this).

If Pargeter removed his rifle from the farm, he was breaking the law.
Apparently the police overlooked this, as they did a number of things where the family were concerned.
Tampering with evidence ect.
How can it be that items were bought to court, and accepted as evidence. even though they had been interferred with. would you like this.
By any stretch of the imagination this was NOT a fair trial.
The piss up after the trial, and the presents awarded to the cops afterwards stinks to high heaven.The icing on the cake is one of the investigating officers was given a job at the caravan park.
Get real Vidic, and take off those rose coloured specticles.

Is that even legal? What gifts did they get (and accept??!)

------------------

Yes, former DCS Mick Ainsley, who headed the second investigation which secure the conviction against Jeremy, was given a job as security adviser by the relatives to help run and protect the caravan park, that Jeremy had a 8% share in...

[paulg]

He said that he took the rifle home as he was going to be attending a shoot.But it would not have been legal to do that either,would it?

It would not have been legal, as he was only permitted to use the rifle at WHF.

I'd be very surprised if the firearm was actually taken away from WHF especially if Nevill was aware of it. I just can't imagine
a law abiding Magistrate like Nevill allowing it in any shape or form. The certificate was issued for WHF and nowhere else and
I'm sure Nevill would of played by the rules (after all it was Nevill's Firearms licence and nobody else's to lose). Anthony
Pargeter's insistence that his weapon was  not at WHF on the night of the murders troubles me, especially when you examine
interview evidence which confirms he changed his story on this point (Mike may be able to help if anyone wants to see this).

If Pargeter removed his rifle from the farm, he was breaking the law.
Apparently the police overlooked this, as they did a number of things where the family were concerned.
Tampering with evidence ect.
How can it be that items were bought to court, and accepted as evidence. even though they had been interferred with. would you like this.
By any stretch of the imagination this was NOT a fair trial.
The piss up after the trial, and the presents awarded to the cops afterwards stinks to high heaven.
The icing on the cake is one of the investigating officers was given a job at the caravan park.
Get real Vidic, and take off those rose coloured specticles.

Nemanja Vidic is on the forum, blimey!!

Only teasing Clifford.

[Roch]

He said that he took the rifle home as he was going to be attending a shoot.But it would not have been legal to do that either,would it?

It would not have been legal, as he was only permitted to use the rifle at WHF.

I'd be very surprised if the firearm was actually taken away from WHF especially if Nevill was aware of it. I just can't imagine
a law abiding Magistrate like Nevill allowing it in any shape or form. The certificate was issued for WHF and nowhere else and
I'm sure Nevill would of played by the rules (after all it was Nevill's Firearms licence and nobody else's to lose). Anthony
Pargeter's insistence that his weapon was  not at WHF on the night of the murders troubles me, especially when you examine
interview evidence which confirms he changed his story on this point (Mike may be able to help if anyone wants to see this).

If Pargeter removed his rifle from the farm, he was breaking the law.
Apparently the police overlooked this, as they did a number of things where the family were concerned.
Tampering with evidence ect.
How can it be that items were bought to court, and accepted as evidence. even though they had been interferred with. would you like this.
By any stretch of the imagination this was NOT a fair trial.
The piss up after the trial, and the presents awarded to the cops afterwards stinks to high heaven.
The icing on the cake is one of the investigating officers was given a job at the caravan park.
Get real Vidic, and take off those rose coloured specticles.

Nemanja Vidic is on the forum, blimey!!

Only teasing Clifford.

'He comes from Serbia... He's gonna murder ya'  (beer alert  )

[tyler]

I have a list made by DB of what weapons were found and (where ) at whf following the murders.Pargeters 2 shotguns were included on it but his rifle was NOT.So unless the police removed it,it was not there the night of the murders.