Author Topic: Why did David Boutflour fail to notice the grey hair on the silencer?  (Read 1298 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13704
According to trial testimony. David Boutflour takes a close look at the knurled end of the silencer and attempts to unscrew it. But does not recall seeing a grey hair.


Once Peter Eaton hands the silencer over to the police, he points out a grey on the same knurled end that DB looked at two days ago.

Since DB noticed the paint and the blood, how did he miss the the grey hair? On a black silencer a grey hair would stand out.

Did he fail to notice it because it simply was not on the silencer at that point in time?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
According to trial testimony. David Boutflour takes a close look at the knurled end of the silencer and attempts to unscrew it. But does not recall seeing a grey hair.


Once Peter Eaton hands the silencer over to the police, he points out a grey on the same knurled end that DB looked at two days ago.

Since DB noticed the paint and the blood, how did he miss the the grey hair? On a black silencer a grey hair would stand out.

Did he fail to notice it because it simply was not on the silencer at that point in time?


Obviously.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33763
Perhaps he should have gone to Spec Save?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Perhaps he should have gone to Spec Save?

Perhaps it was darK?  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33763
Perhaps it was darK?  ;D


That'll be it. You can't see colourless in the dark :))

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076

That'll be it. You can't see colourless in the dark :))

Well apparently, you can't do anything - wonder how blind people cope?  :-\ Could it be that they work with familiarity?  ;)
« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 02:27:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33763
Well apparently, you can't do anything - wonder how blind people cope?  :-\ Could it be that they work with familiarity?  ;)

 They must do. It wouldn't be any use them waiting until it got light.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13704
Obviously.

So the hair was put there by either AE or PE.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
So the hair was put there by either AE or PE.

Why is that the only alternative? It wasn't exactly kep in a sterile environment was it?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44118
Surprising.

Thought a pre planned intricate, innovative & risky frame would have everyone singing from the same hymn sheet. It won't be hard for all of them to say the silencer had a grey hair on.

I suspect DB saw the hair but was focused on the blood & paint on the silencer. He simply didn't focus on the grey hair.

The relatives had already put Sheila's wet period blood & aga paint in the silencer. So no point putting a random grey hair on it.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 07:48:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44118
Be good to see the trial transcript.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
According to trial testimony. David Boutflour takes a close look at the knurled end of the silencer and attempts to unscrew it. But does not recall seeing a grey hair.


Once Peter Eaton hands the silencer over to the police, he points out a grey on the same knurled end that DB looked at two days ago.

Since DB noticed the paint and the blood, how did he miss the the grey hair? On a black silencer a grey hair would stand out.

Did he fail to notice it because it simply was not on the silencer at that point in time?

how good was his eye sight? did he wear glasses and when was his last eye test?

Offline Harry

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
According to trial testimony. David Boutflour takes a close look at the knurled end of the silencer and attempts to unscrew it. But does not recall seeing a grey hair.


Once Peter Eaton hands the silencer over to the police, he points out a grey on the same knurled end that DB looked at two days ago.

Since DB noticed the paint and the blood, how did he miss the the grey hair? On a black silencer a grey hair would stand out.

Did he fail to notice it because it simply was not on the silencer at that point in time?


"Since DB noticed the paint and the blood, how did he miss the the grey hair?"

But how can you believe that David Boutflour noticed the paint on the silencer, if you believe it wasn't there until the relatives scratched the aga with it, before handing it in to the police on August 12th?
« Last Edit: July 29, 2018, 05:31:AM by Harry »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Why is that the only alternative? It wasn't exactly kep in a sterile environment was it?






Cross contamination had appeared to have been the norm ? Swabs/silencer/. Anything else ?