Author Topic: 'THE LIE OF THE TRUTH' - Madeleine McCann mystery finally solved (Mike Tesko)...  (Read 11343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360
If she had died by means of some accident earlier in the day or even earlier in the week I don't see why the McCanns wouldn't just take her to the nearest hospital. I'm not sure what the conspiracy is in this case. https://youtu.be/XL_QIt-unBs

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The lobster crèche register entries, dated am 2nd May, pm 2nd May, am 3rd May and pm 3rd May 2007 are false records, introduced as part of the narrative to fool the public at large into accepting that Madeleine McCann was alive longer than she could have been?

Involved in the narrative building in different sequences of the overall abduction tale, were the McFlies, at least one crèche nanny, David Payne, Fiona Payne, Mat Oldfield, Russel O'Brien, Jane Tanner, Robert Murat, Serge Malinka, and possibly others...

Now, before anyone jumps the gun, and starts claiming that with so many bit part players involved in the narrative building of the tale, and that it would have been nigh on impossible to keep a lid on the truth for so long, my response is that the preverbial lid couldn't have remained intact for over the 11 years or so since this tragic event had taken place, is open, the lie of the truth is that the narrative as spoken about by the main players and the bit part players does not accord with known about and proven facts - there exists a plethora of conflicting accounts given by all concerned designed to misinform the general public at large about when Madeleine McCann had last been seen alive? There is no credible evidence or proof that anyone outside the circle of the McFlies confirms that Madeleine was still alive at any stage realistically after 14.30hrs on Tuesday 1st May 2007  when Gerry McFly took her to the lobster crèche - according to the crèche nanny, there existed two separate crèche registers per day (am and pm), but the ones seized by the police tell a different tale! How could the crèche nanny be so confoundedly wrong when she was responsible for creating the registers concerned? There was only (on the face of it) one crèche register per day, where the morning and afternoon crèche sessions were recorded on the same page/sheet? How could anyone trust a crèche nanny to look after more than one child at a time, when the nanny in question doesn't appear to be able to count beyond the no.1?

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Involved in the narrative building in different sequences of the overall abduction tale, were the McFlies, at least one crèche nanny, David Payne, Fiona Payne, Mat Oldfield, Russel O'Brien, Jane Tanner, Robert Murat, Serge Malinka, and possibly others...

Now, before anyone jumps the gun, and starts claiming that with so many bit part players involved in the narrative building of the tale, and that it would have been nigh on impossible to keep a lid on the truth for so long, my response is that the preverbial lid couldn't have remained intact for over the 11 years or so since this tragic event had taken place, is open, the lie of the truth is that the narrative as spoken about by the main players and the bit part players does not accord with known about and proven facts - there exists a plethora of conflicting accounts given by all concerned designed to misinform the general public at large about when Madeleine McCann had last been seen alive? There is no credible evidence or proof that anyone outside the circle of the McFlies confirms that Madeleine was still alive at any stage realistically after 14.30hrs on Tuesday 1st May 2007  when Gerry McFly took her to the lobster crèche - according to the crèche nanny, there existed two separate crèche registers per day (am and pm), but the ones seized by the police tell a different tale! How could the crèche nanny be so confoundedly wrong when she was responsible for creating the registers concerned? There was only (on the face of it) one crèche register per day, where the morning and afternoon crèche sessions were recorded on the same page/sheet? How could anyone trust a crèche nanny to look after more than one child at a time, when the nanny in question doesn't appear to be able to count beyond the no.1?

With the crèche nanny (CATuk) unable to function or calculate beyond the number 1, who can't differentiate the difference between 2 and 1, what chance has she got of expecting anyone to believe that after 14.30hrs on 1st May 2007, that she saw Madeleine McCann on no less than 5 separate occasions (pm on 1st, am and pm on the 2nd, and am and pm on the 3rd May 2007)?

Her evidence is not credible!

She was transferred from working in the crèche at Warner soon after the McCann fiasco to another resort. .
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360
Maddie gets the American treatment: https://youtu.be/xHcwTx3DgDc


Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48644
If she had died by means of some accident earlier in the day or even earlier in the week I don't see why the McCanns wouldn't just take her to the nearest hospital. I'm not sure what the conspiracy is in this case. https://youtu.be/XL_QIt-unBs





There's no conspiracy----the child was stolen.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360




There's no conspiracy----the child was stolen.
Do you think it was a planned abduction lookout and if so wouldn't the girl have been discovered by now?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48644
Do you think it was a planned abduction lookout and if so wouldn't the girl have been discovered by now?







It seemed to have been as there were too many coincidences such as knowing where the parents and friends were, leaving the children unattended. Also knowing that the night out would be the last before leaving for the UK next day.

The area itself appeared dodgy with everyone seemingly knowing who was coming and going as well as an unnatural focus on children as being " child-friendly " an advertising magnet for paedophiles in the area. The McCanns were sitting ducks I'm afraid.

It was enough for me when I read about the children's home, the Casa Pia ( I think it was ) where all and sundry used to congregate. 

I think Madeleine was stolen to order.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360






It seemed to have been as there were too many coincidences such as knowing where the parents and friends were, leaving the children unattended. Also knowing that the night out would be the last before leaving for the UK next day.

The area itself appeared dodgy with everyone seemingly knowing who was coming and going as well as an unnatural focus on children as being " child-friendly " an advertising magnet for paedophiles in the area. The McCanns were sitting ducks I'm afraid.

It was enough for me when I read about the children's home, the Casa Pia ( I think it was ) where all and sundry used to congregate. 

I think Madeleine was stolen to order.
But this is a sleepy seaside town of 3545 inhabitants (Wikipedia) where as you say everyone knows people's business, so more likely for a stranger to stand out. I can't help but feel that Robert Murat (allegedly) had become unhinged due to the separation from his wife, he sees a successful couple with a daughter reminding him very much of his own, whom he no longer sees, and maybe out of jealousy or spite snatches her, dumps her body in one of the container bins, then mingles with the crowd to gauge reaction and alleviate suspicion.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 04:40:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079




There's no conspiracy----the child was stolen.

Unfortunately, there is absolutely no evidence that anybody stole the deceased body of a little child, who in their right mind would contemplate such a horrible deed. But getting rid of the child's body because of the consequences it would have brought to the parents, in terms of their careers, and remaining family unit, not to mention any linked criminal proceedings that could have been brought against them, and anyone who has assisted them in their narrative, does not bode well for the lot of them!

At least 80% of the public believe that the McFly parents had something to do with Madeleine McCann's disappearence, the actual figure could be as high, if not more than 90%..

Let's look at the hard facts surrounding the supposed 'last high tea, involving Madeleine McCann on the afternoon of 3rd May 2007! In her book, 'MADELEINE', in her own words, Kate returned from her run that afternoon, to find that Gerry, and Amelie, Sean and Madeleine, had all already started their tea's when Kate turned up!

Yet, according to the contents of the lobster crèche register, recorded that last afternoon (3rd May 2007), Kate had collected Madeleine at 17.30 hrs, and before that had at 17.25hrs also collected Amelie and Sean from the Jellyfish creche which was located right next door to where high tea was already being served.by 5.30pm...

Yet, how could all this possibly be true, if as Kate McFly states in her book, that When she returned from her run that afternoon, she went to the tappas and found that Gerry, Amelie, Sean and Madeleine were already there, and that they had all already started their tea's!

Well, I'm sorry, but Kate McFly is full of shit!

If the occasion when she had returned from her run had been the very last time she had enjoyed high tea in the company ofjer husband, and all three siblings you would not forget the fact that you had collected Amelie and Sean from the Jellyfish creche at 17…25hrs, then dashed all the way down to the lobsters crèche 5 minutes later at 17.30hrs to collect Madeleine, and sign both registers which are kept at each of the two separate creches, if by the time you had returned from your run to the tapas bar at 17.30hrs, you arrived there to find your husband already there, with your three siblings, all having already started eating their tea's, before you had arrived there!

Kate McFly is a pathological liar!

You couldn't get such basic facts relating to the last meal you had enjoyed together some four and a half hours, before you were claiming you had discovered Madeleine had supposedly been taken (by 10pm, that same evening) In some far fetched narrative involving at least two abductors, not one - based on her blurting out 'they've taken her, they've taken her, Madeleine is gone'  when she returned to the tapas restaurant and bar!

No jury in the land would believe the highly significant and glaring inconsistencies produced in this matter, as proof that Madeleine McCann had even enjoyed High tea on that last afternoon, let alone have supposedly returned to the McFly apartment, where Kate bathed and dressed all three siblings ready for bed, accompanied by a treat of crisps and bedtime stories before all three children were put to bed, and all three were sound asleep by 8.30pm...

It's all a pack of lies!

Let the McFly parents and the other tapas mob members take a lie detector test - as inch a course
Of action is guaranteed to sort this bullshit abduction out, once and for all!

They all know that Madeleine died, and that the McFly entuorage disposed of her remains because they knew that with Madies death being treated as a suspicious death that there would have to be an autopsy /post mortem, and that the parents and other adult gang members would be held accountable for markings on her body and drugs in her blood and urine!
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 05:08:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360
This presupposes a lot of lies, from nanny Charlotte Pennington to the Tapas 7 who are not going to jeopardize their careers to help Gerry and Kate, who were newcomers to the group. I can't ever see a mother drugging her children, and of course if Gerry does bring tranquillizers through hand luggage or hold baggage he is at risk of being stopped by customs.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
No parent faced with the unexpected loss of a sibling matching those in the McFly narrative would forget every last detail of the last day they had spent with that child!

But...

Not the McFlies, they simply couldn't get basic facts right about who did what, when and how in their narratives!

Give them all a lie detector test, I guarantee none of them will pass it with flying colours!

The only thing of any note and colour that is bound to crop up in all of this, are red flags. Signalling the fact that what they are saying simply cannot be true! Madeleine had visible Marks on her arm as shown in a photograph taken after she arrived on holiday in Portugal - her death was always going to raise questions, by long before any tranquilizing sedative might have been administered, or she had supposedly been taken!
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 06:24:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
This presupposes a lot of lies, from nanny Charlotte Pennington to the Tapas 7 who are not going to jeopardize their careers to help Gerry and Kate, who were newcomers to the group. I can't ever see a mother drugging her children, and of course if Gerry does bring tranquillizers through hand luggage or hold baggage he is at risk of being stopped by customs.

That presupposes that the McFlies brought the tranquilizing sedative through customs themselves, or obtained them by other means after they arrived in Portugal - but what if the McFlies obtained the tranquilizing sedatives from either David Payne, Russell O'Brien, Matt Oldfield, Jane Tanner, or one of the other group members?

In those circumstances, the overdosing of a little girl or two during that holiday period would have had dire consequences for more than the McFly parents, it was potentially a significant problem for the whole group as a whole!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
That presupposes that the McFlies brought the tranquilizing sedative through customs themselves, or obtained them by other means after they arrived in Portugal - but what if the McFlies obtained the tranquilizing sedatives from either David Payne, Russell O'Brien, Matt Oldfield, Jane Tanner, or one of the other group members?

In those circumstances, the overdosing of a little girl or two during that holiday period would have had dire consequences for more than the McFly parents, it was potentially a significant problem for the whole group as a whole!

For this reason, there would surely have arisen some support from eachother to try to ensure that the illicit misuse of tranquilizing sedatives on the children in the group belonging to adult members was worth telling a lie or two..
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 06:04:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20360
That presupposes that the McFlies brought the tranquilizing sedative through customs themselves, or obtained them by other means after they arrived in Portugal - but what if the McFlies obtained the tranquilizing sedatives from either David Payne, Russell O'Brien, Matt Oldfield, Jane Tanner, or one of the other group members?

In those circumstances, the overdosing of a little girl or two during that holiday period would have had dire consequences for more than the McFly parents, it was potentially a significant problem for the whole group as a whole!
But there was a babysitting service available, which the doctors as a group were remiss in not availing themselves of. They let their guard down on holiday after the stressful hospital environment of home, thinking that off-season there would be no risk to their offspring.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I find it very interesting that one of the other children belonging to the group was also taken ill on the very same evening that the narrative regarding Madeleine McCann's disappearence was set into motion?

Why didn't the parents of the 'other' sick child call out the emergency services to deal with the second sick child?

Maybe people should start asking questions about that, and maybe Madeleine had a far worse reaction than the other little girl? There is also the matter of one of the adult group members being taken ill around Tuesday 1st May 2007, which got put down to a bug which had been picked up on the flight inbound...

It's possible that all these three incidents are related (1) the death of Madeleine McCann on Tuesday 1st May 2007, together with (2) the stomach bug claim of one of the adult tapas bar members on the very same date, followed by (3) the second little girl who fell ill on the evening of 3rd May 2007, the one whom Jane Tanner and Russell O'Brien looked after?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...