Okay so what do we have here....
1/ The Judges's summing up 'JEREMY' or 'SHEILA" is TOTALLY misleading to the Jury, someone else could easily and probably was involved.
2/ There were unidentified finger prints on BAMBER rifle, see above if 3rd party
3/ There was an unidentified male outside on or around 3.50am
4/ 1/ above is correct, I challenge anyone to disagree, therefore this is misleading:
"Then another point is that when she was found, there was no blood marks on her feet – on the soles of her feet. Well, you may think that is a matter of considerable importance because she had been involved in the fighting with her father as well as killing her mother, surely it is inconceivable that her feet would have been clean in the way that they were found to be, and in the way you see them to be clean from the photograph. What is suggested on behalf of the Defence is that after killing, at any rate, the father and the mother, she went and washed; and tied up with that piece of evidence is the fact that there were no marks of lead on her hands. Well, now, so far as that is concerned, you have had the opportunity yourselves to load the magazine, and see what happened to your hands which you will bear in mind, whether you think it likely that she would have had lead marks on her hands. If she would have done, then the Defence answer that by saying well, nevertheless she may have washed between loading the magazine the second time and killing herself. "As to the suggestion that she may have washed, well it is a matter to which I am sure you will give thought because it may be an important part of the evidence in this case that her hands and feet did not bear upon them either blood on her feet, or marks from the bullets on the hands, that one might have been expecting."
JUDGE'S SUMMING UP
thanks David
