More tales from the living dead.

[David1819]

It will take a little time to prepare a post setting out the history of this character.  It is good that he has at last been exposed but it will be worth explaining his interaction with people here.  His book on the Bamber case is a complete work of fiction as was his fabricated story in the Scottish Sunday Express.  It will take a bit of time to retrieve all the material but I will try to do that as soon as I can.

Talking of books Neil, I spoke to Andrew Hunter a few month ago. He has still been working on his Jeremy Bamber book after all this time and has almost completed it. He is now looking for a publisher.

[ngb1066]

Talking of books Neil, I spoke to Andrew Hunter a few month ago. He has still been working on his Jeremy Bamber book after all this time and has almost completed it. He is now looking for a publisher.

That is very interesting.  I know he does have access to a lot of the case material.

[David1819]

exposed by the sun i wonder how that happend.

theres not a sun reporter on here is there.

He was not exposed by the Sun per say. He was exposed by the FBI and the Yorkshire Ripper. Then the Sun reported it.

I doubt any investigative journalist has read up on PH here. I would have expected this much sooner had that been the case.

I wonder what prompted the FBI to help expose Paul Harrison?

"Seven ex-FBI agents who Harrison would have worked with say they have no idea who he was.

One agent Mark Safari said: “Any claim that he conducted interviews of those serial killers is completely false.”"

Several months ago I raised attention over on the Zodiac Killer forums about Paul Harrison's upcoming Zodiac Killer book, warning people not to waste any time or money on it and that he will invent claims and falsely attribute them to the deceased investigators involved. Those forums have primarily an American user base and the FBI were heavily involved in helping SFPD with the Zodiac killer right up until the early 1990s.

Perhaps some retired FBI agents got wind of Paul Harrison's planned Zodiac book and didn't want their deceased colleague's being fictionalised to glorify this weirdo. The front cover already had a quote from Detective Toschi saying - "Paul Harrison, The Zodiac expert I wish I had working on the case with me"

With such outrageous claims. Sooner or later someone was going to close the net on him.

[nugnug]

He was not exposed by the Sun per say. He was exposed by the FBI and the Yorkshire Ripper. Then the Sun reported it.

I doubt any investigative journalist has read up on PH here. I would have expected this much sooner had that been the case.

I wonder what prompted the FBI to help expose Paul Harrison?

"Seven ex-FBI agents who Harrison would have worked with say they have no idea who he was.

hes been well know on the jack the riipper forum for long time.

i think hes book was jack the ripper mystory solved a raher misleading title.

One agent Mark Safari said: “Any claim that he conducted interviews of those serial killers is completely false.”"

Several months ago I raised attention over on the Zodiac Killer forums about Paul Harrison's upcoming Zodiac Killer book, warning people not to waste any time or money on it and that he will invent claims and falsely attribute them to the deceased investigators involved. Those forums have primarily an American user base and the FBI were heavily involved in helping SFPD with the Zodiac killer right up until the early 1990s.

Perhaps some retired FBI agents got wind of Paul Harrison's planned Zodiac book and didn't want their deceased colleague's being fictionalised to glorify this weirdo. The front cover already had a quote from Detective Toschi saying - "Paul Harrison, The Zodiac expert I wish I had working on the case with me"

With such outrageous claims. Sooner or later someone was going to close the net on him.

[nugnug]

caroline are you pleased he mentioned youu in the credits or would you rather he hadent.

[Caroline]

caroline are you pleased he mentioned youu in the credits or would you rather he hadent.

Not bothered one way or the other but I am not the only person here that was mentioned. Given your comment, I hope Lookout wasn't referring to me as a 'rouge' because if so, I would like her to clarify EXACTLY what she was getting at?

I have purposely not commented on this topic because I had a suspicion that someone eventually would try and draw me in. I have spoken at length to NGB about my supposed association with PH, most of which has been dreamt up by some members here and quite a few forget how they fawned over him when they thought he was writing a book about an innocent Jeremy Bamber. Some even think I changed my opinion because he did - those people are stupid and not worth a concern.

I haven't heard from PH in years, I don't search the internet to find out what he is doing because I simply don't care. He has made a bed and now has to lie in it (pardon the pun). That is all I have to say about him.

[David1819]

I have spoken at length to NGB about my supposed association with PH, most of which has been dreamt up by some members here and quite a few forget how they fawned over him when they thought he was writing a book about an innocent Jeremy Bamber. Some even think I changed my opinion because he did - those people are stupid and not worth a concern.

You made numerous attempts to defend the claims made in his book after it was released and its contents scrutinized on this forum and red. It was rather obvious you believed what PH had written e.g his alleged meeting with Ed Lawson to name a few. You changing your mind in close proximity to him doing just that only compounds peoples suspicions.

Its a valid conjecture to make and the majority of this forum is not stupid.

[lookout]

No, Caroline, I wasn't referring to you as a rogue as you should well appreciate. The remark went to Tony Bennett the solicitor who once accused the McCanns of involvement with their daughter's disappearance then went on to say that " they'd covered it up ".
Why would you even think I'd have you down as a rogue ?? TBH I didn't even see your name, but I saw Bennett's straight away.
While you're at it could you clarify those members who dreamt up your association with PH just so that I'm not included in it?

[Caroline]

You made numerous attempts to defend the claims made in his book after it was released and its contents scrutinized on this forum and red. It was rather obvious you believed what PH had written e.g his alleged meeting with Ed Lawson to name a few. You changing your mind in close proximity to him doing just that only compounds peoples suspicions.

Its a valid conjecture to make and the majority of this forum is not stupid.

I'm not getting dragged into your little game David. Already you are insinuating that he was caught out because of some crap you wrote on another forum. PH isn't the only one with a massive ego who makes outlandish claims!

By the way, I don't think I defended his book but there was a time when I thought he was genuine, like a LOT of people here! I had a long discussion with NGB a few months ago on this very topic but I have no intention of providing YOU with the details and I have no problem with people like you being suspicious because I don't rate your opinion. Crack on!

[Caroline]

No, Caroline, I wasn't referring to you as a rogue as you should well appreciate. The remark went to Tony Bennett the solicitor who once accused the McCanns of involvement with their daughter's disappearance then went on to say that " they'd covered it up ".
Why would you even think I'd have you down as a rogue ?? TBH I didn't even see your name, but I saw Bennett's straight away.
While you're at it could you clarify those members who dreamt up your association with PH just so that I'm not included in it?

Then I apologise Lookout - the reason I thought you meant me was because of Nugs's comment. Paranoia I guess.

No, I wasn't including you in my comment, there is one poster in particular that the comment was aimed at.

By the way, welcome back!

[lookout]

I was nearly going to say in my last post that I wasn't impressed by the greeting on my return back to the fold, however I forgive you and thank you for the swift change of mind, that was much nicer.

[David1819]

Doctors have advised PH not to undertake any further events. Due to " on-going ill health ". This was regarding Facebook Manchester Crime Club.


In his Facebook post Harrison wrote : " This monster is no longer mine,nor is it what I wanted it to be. I saw it as a tool to give victims a voice, everywhere but because I'm weak and vulnerable and utterly useless at decision making I was introduced to sensationalising events by promoters who often sent out misleading blurb. Something I had to live up to. I've decided to call it a day for now. No more shows or interaction on social media-----It seems I've let everyone down.I'm sorry for that ".

His apology or confession (whatever you want to call it) is totally pathetic. He has tried to blame it on his event promoters and claiming he was giving the victims a voice. From what I can see, all he ever spoke about was himself. Even once exposed he cannot be honest.  His publishers/event organisers are victims of his deceit also and have their reputations tarnished, the only thing they are in the wrong over is not carrying out thorough due diligence.

[nugnug]

His apology or confession (whatever you want to call it) is totally pathetic. He has tried to blame it on his event promoters and claiming he was giving the victims a voice. From what I can see, all he ever spoke about was himself. Even once exposed he cannot be honest.  His publishers/event organisers are victims of his deceit also and have their reputations tarnished, the only thing they are in the wrong over is not carrying out thorough due diligence.

but then agian neather did we till he turned on us.

[ngb1066]

His apology or confession (whatever you want to call it) is totally pathetic. He has tried to blame it on his event promoters and claiming he was giving the victims a voice. From what I can see, all he ever spoke about was himself. Even once exposed he cannot be honest.  His publishers/event organisers are victims of his deceit also and have their reputations tarnished, the only thing they are in the wrong over is not carrying out thorough due diligence.

I agree.  He is facing civil claims at the very least and will be lucky to avoid criminal prosecution. I think he is a very worried man - he certainly should be!  I will post more in due course.

[David1819]

I agree.  He is facing civil claims at the very least and will be lucky to avoid criminal prosecution. I think he is a very worried man - he certainly should be! I will post more in due course.

Whats the hold up? are you compiling a dossier?  Tales from the living dead. A definitive guide by NGB.