Julie Mugford's Midland Branch, Colchester account needs investigating by HMRC

[Steve_uk]

I agree with your first point but not your second.  JM's evidence was one of the central planks of the prosecution case and if that evidence can now be undermined it would be a powerrful ground of appeal.

Yes and the problem you have is you've never been able to confute it after 33 years.

[Luminous Wanderer]

Yes and the problem you have is you've never been able to confute it after 33 years.

Why would anybody waste time trying to refute what that silly cow said?  A fool's errand, if ever there was one.  Her evidence was and remains completely meaningless.

[ngb1066]

Yes and the problem you have is you've never been able to confute it after 33 years.

There is now available information which was not available at the trial, the first appeal or the second appeal.  Had there been a referral for a third appeal in 2012 the new material would have featured in the grounds of appeal.  It was not obtained until after the final submissions were made.

[Steve_uk]

There is now available information which was not available at the trial, the first appeal or the second appeal.  Had there been a referral for a third appeal in 2012 the new material would have featured in the grounds of appeal.  It was not obtained until after the final submissions were made.

Yes and it's all very hush-hush and members of this site are the last people to know..

[maggie]

Yes and it's all very hush-hush and members of this site are the last people to know..

But we are just a discussion forum with no connection to the official JB site. There is no reason why we would know.

[ngb1066]

Yes and it's all very hush-hush and members of this site are the last people to know..

Some members know but as you know there is unease about revealing details if the information has not been made public elsewhere.  I have been privy to some information and although I personally would see no harm in much of it being made public I will not do that as I was given the information upon the basis of an understanding of confidentiality.   

[Nigel]

bump