« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*  (Read 17094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #45 on: March 19, 2018, 09:22:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:19:PM
Ah, well...

I suppose it depends upon what you choose to believe..

DS Stan Jones took possession of the sound moderator from the scene on the 7th August 1985 ('SBJ/1')...

What?, please elaborate. Wednesday the 7th August 1985 the day of the murders?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 09:24:PM by Nigel »
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #46 on: March 19, 2018, 09:23:PM »
If Stan Jones seized the sound moderator ('SBJ/1') from the scene on 7th August 1985, how did 'it' end up back in the relatives possession in time for David Boutflour to recover it from the scene on 10th August 1985?
« Last Edit: March 20, 2018, 06:34:AM by mike tesko »
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #47 on: March 19, 2018, 09:24:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:23:PM
If Stan Jones seized the sound moderator ('SBJ/1') from the scene on 7th August 1985, how did 'it' end up back in the relatives possession in time for David Boutflour to recover it from the scene on 10th August 1975?

Exactly....
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13782
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #48 on: March 19, 2018, 09:28:PM »
Quote from: Nigel on March 19, 2018, 09:24:PM
Exactly....

The chain of custody is a mess. It is best to look at the forensics rather than the paperwork

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9070.msg428816.html#msg428816
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #49 on: March 19, 2018, 09:44:PM »
Mike is saying it was a joint effort.

Stan Jones giving the silencer to the relatives. Then the relatives handing the silencer back to Stan Jones with the blood, paint & hair on.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #50 on: March 19, 2018, 09:47:PM »
Quote from: Adam on March 19, 2018, 09:44:PM
Mike is saying it was a joint effort.

Stan Jones giving the silencer to the relatives. Then the relatives handing the silencer back to Stan Jones with the blood, paint & hair on.

Yes, the paper trail supports this occurrence!
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #51 on: March 19, 2018, 09:52:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:47:PM
Yes, the paper trail supports this occurrence!

Then...

Relatives gave the sound moderator back to the police (Peter Eaton handed sound moderator to DS Jones, on evening of 12th August 1985), but on some day prior to 30th August 1985, Essex police handed the sound moderator back to the relatives, which in turn enabled Ann Eaton to hand back the sound moderator to DC Oakey on the 11th September 1985...

Please...

What more really needs to be said?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 09:53:PM by mike tesko »
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #52 on: March 19, 2018, 09:55:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:52:PM
Then...

Relatives gave the sound moderator back to the police (Peter Eaton handed sound moderator to DS Jones, on evening of 12th August 1985), but on some day prior to 30th August 1985, Essex police handed the sound moderator back to the relatives, which in turn enabled Ann Eaton to hand back the sound moderator to DC Oakey on the 11th September 1985...

Please...

What more really needs to be said?

Somebody like me, does not need to make things up, the evidence is there for all to see, if you tamper with key evidence, you deserve everything that you and yours, have got coming to you!
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #53 on: March 19, 2018, 09:56:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:47:PM
Yes, the paper trail supports this occurrence!

I 100% agree with you.

The lack of scratches above the Aga on the Wednesady and the substantial 'inheritance' is damming.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 09:57:PM by Nigel »
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #54 on: March 19, 2018, 10:03:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on March 19, 2018, 09:52:PM
Then...

Relatives gave the sound moderator back to the police (Peter Eaton handed sound moderator to DS Jones, on evening of 12th August 1985), but on some day prior to 30th August 1985, Essex police handed the sound moderator back to the relatives, which in turn enabled Ann Eaton to hand back the sound moderator to DC Oakey on the 11th September 1985...

Please...

What more really needs to be said?

If the police had the silencer on the 7th August, why didn't they scratch the aga & put Sheila's blood in the silencer themselves ?

Seems very risky asking the relatives to do it & then hope the relatives do not crack under pressure.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 10:04:PM by Adam »
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #55 on: March 19, 2018, 10:17:PM »
I don't think the relatives are smart enough to put paint, blood and hair on sound Moderator. That just my personal opinion.
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #56 on: March 19, 2018, 10:19:PM »
Quote from: Nigel on March 19, 2018, 10:17:PM
I don't think the relatives are smart enough to put paint, blood and hair on sound Moderator. That just my personal opinion.

Do you believe the police did that. Then asked the relatives to say in their witness statements they found the silencer ?
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #57 on: March 19, 2018, 10:25:PM »
Quote from: Adam on March 19, 2018, 10:19:PM
Do you believe the police did that. Then asked the relatives to say in their witness statements they found the silencer ?

I believe Stan Jones had a deep seated resentment, bordering on hatred towards Jeremy Bamber.
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13782
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #58 on: March 19, 2018, 10:40:PM »
Quote from: Nigel on March 19, 2018, 10:17:PM
I don't think the relatives are smart enough to put paint, blood and hair on sound Moderator. That just my personal opinion.

Well they were smart enough to point it out to the police before the lab confirmed the paint was a match  ;)
Logged

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: *Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*
« Reply #59 on: March 19, 2018, 10:43:PM »
Quote from: David1819 on March 19, 2018, 10:40:PM
Well they were smart enough to point it out to the police before the lab confirmed the paint was a match  ;)

Sure, but did not mean they 'planted it'. As I say just my theory.
Logged
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »