Being as the windows had been freshly painted any interference with the locks would have left their mark,being tacky in the areas such as the locking devices unless the painter was a thorough tradesman who first burnt the old paint off---------which I'd very much doubt.
Even the Aga had layers of old paint which made it prone to the least scuffing-----as was seen.
Even the painter himself had been working right up until the tragedy which would mean that certain areas there'd have been wet paint outside. JB would have known that at the time so would he have taken the chance to have risked leaving his mark ? No of course not.
What a performance when time was of the essence ? Then to make sure that no evidence was left behind-----prints/fibres etc ?
A murder is either planned or committed on the spur of the moment and I say it was done without forethought or planning.
Lookout, constantly saying that the windows had only recently been painted doesn't make it fact. Certainly, they'd been painted but "recently" is entirely relative.
The painter may well have been working right up until the murders, but as the windows were closed it stands to reason that they'd gone well passed the sticking stage. We may be entirely certain that any "wet paint" outside did not include the windows, much as you'd like us to believe.
I'd say it's a certainty that the murders were planned and calculated to take place at such time when the entire family -including Sheila- was gathered. How else was it going to be possible to make it look as if she'd been responsible? No planned crime is ever carried out with the thought in mind that it might fail. The potential gains being a greater carrot than fear of failure. Whilst you may look at the best part of half a million as not being worth Jeremy getting out of bed for, to we, less well cushioned members of 1985 society, it was a small fortune.