Author Topic: Adams claims  (Read 3107 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Adams claims
« on: January 03, 2018, 03:57:PM »
Adam has claimed that the Boutflours were really wealthy, which is untrue.
When David was asked he said all the money is gone. How?
If the Boutflours were so rich where did the money go in such a short space of time?
The fact is the family were beholden to Neville, and with JB in charge they were going to be sunk.
It is no secret that JB disliked the Boutflours and the feelings were mutual.
Neville had already bought ground from under the Boutflours feet which caused a punch up with Neville.
It was imperative that JB was out of the equation.
I am sure the cops never knew of this, and were spoonfed by the family, and Sherlock Jones fell for it.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2018, 04:10:PM »
Adam has claimed that the Boutflours were really wealthy, which is untrue.

More or less everything Adam claims is untrue.

When David was asked he said all the money is gone. How?

If I remember correctly this claim was made in 2009.

The fact is the family were beholden to Neville, and with JB in charge they were going to be sunk.
It is no secret that JB disliked the Boutflours and the feelings were mutual.
Neville had already bought ground from under the Boutflours feet which caused a punch up with Neville.
It was imperative that JB was out of the equation.
I am sure the cops never knew of this, and were spoonfed by the family, and Sherlock Jones fell for it.

Neville owned the land they farmed on.

When AE got wind of JBs intentions to sell that land, she went ape shit.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2018, 04:18:PM »
Adam has claimed that the Boutflours were really wealthy, which is untrue.
When David was asked he said all the money is gone. How?
If the Boutflours were so rich where did the money go in such a short space of time?
The fact is the family were beholden to Neville, and with JB in charge they were going to be sunk.
It is no secret that JB disliked the Boutflours and the feelings were mutual.
Neville had already bought ground from under the Boutflours feet which caused a punch up with Neville.
It was imperative that JB was out of the equation.
I am sure the cops never knew of this, and were spoonfed by the family, and Sherlock Jones fell for it.

Buddy, perhaps we could look at this from a different angle?

Wealth is relative. The Boutflours, I think, were probably wealthy, but compared with the Bambers, just not "really" wealthy.

David said the money was gone. OF COURSE the money was gone!!! That sort of money isn't kept in a bank account. It becomes property/land. It's feed into business's. It will be placed somewhere which will bring good returns. But NOT necessarily where hands can be laid on it at a minute's notice.

I think you're probably correct in that it was Nevill's family who held REAL wealth. It's likely that RWB was more of an academic than someone who had business acumen, but it doesn't mean he was a pauper. I'm comfortably certain that RWB secretly seethed every time he had a good idea which Nevill could afford to carry out. I believe there was rivalry there. I've already laid out reasons why I feel they so disliked Jeremy.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2018, 04:25:PM »
David said the money was gone. OF COURSE the money was gone!!! That sort of money isn't kept in a bank account. It becomes property/land. It's feed into business's. It will be placed somewhere which will bring good returns. But NOT necessarily where hands can be laid on it at a minute's notice.


From the horses mouth.

"I have inherited quite a large amount of money as a result of Jeremy. And most of it I've wasted, I've spent," he said.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jan/30/jeremy-bamber-appeal-murders-evidence
« Last Edit: January 03, 2018, 04:25:PM by David1819 »

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2018, 04:36:PM »
Buddy, perhaps we could look at this from a different angle?

Wealth is relative. The Boutflours, I think, were probably wealthy, but compared with the Bambers, just not "really" wealthy.

David said the money was gone. OF COURSE the money was gone!!! That sort of money isn't kept in a bank account. It becomes property/land. It's feed into business's. It will be placed somewhere which will bring good returns. But NOT necessarily where hands can be laid on it at a minute's notice.

I think you're probably correct in that it was Nevill's family who held REAL wealth. It's likely that RWB was more of an academic than someone who had business acumen, but it doesn't mean he was a pauper. I'm comfortably certain that RWB secretly seethed every time he had a good idea which Nevill could afford to carry out. I believe there was rivalry there. I've already laid out reasons why I feel they so disliked Jeremy.
I agree up to a point Jane. If the family had wealth then there was no reason why the money should have gone. Although it was years later the family took over WHF because they were broke

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44292
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2018, 04:41:PM »
More or less everything Adam claims is untrue.

If I remember correctly this claim was made in 2009.

Neville owned the land they farmed on.

When AE got wind of JBs intentions to sell that land, she went ape shit.

Moderators can you take action please. Otherwise I will list all the things David has posted which is untrue.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44292
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2018, 04:42:PM »
Adam has claimed that the Boutflours were really wealthy, which is untrue.
When David was asked he said all the money is gone. How?
If the Boutflours were so rich where did the money go in such a short space of time?
The fact is the family were beholden to Neville, and with JB in charge they were going to be sunk.
It is no secret that JB disliked the Boutflours and the feelings were mutual.
Neville had already bought ground from under the Boutflours feet which caused a punch up with Neville.
It was imperative that JB was out of the equation.
I am sure the cops never knew of this, and were spoonfed by the family, and Sherlock Jones fell for it.

Have you got a source that the relatives were poor ?

Thought not.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2018, 04:44:PM »
I agree up to a point Jane. If the family had wealth then there was no reason why the money should have gone. Although it was years later the family took over WHF because they were broke

Buddy, I'm not sure what you mean here. How COULD they take over another property if "they were broke"? I've no idea how they've done it, but Vaulty is a magnificent wedding venue and OCP is an award winning holiday park. I don't imagine that the lawyers worked for nothing, who worked for them when Jeremy tried to sue them.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44292
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2018, 04:48:PM »
https://youtu.be/BLedeOGdj2U

1 minute 17 seconds. Even Bamber's own videos say the relatives are rich.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2018, 04:48:PM »
Moderators can you take action please. Otherwise I will list all the things David has posted which is untrue.
:'(

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2018, 04:54:PM »
Get real Adam I did not say they were poor.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2018, 04:56:PM »
Buddy, I'm not sure what you mean here. How COULD they take over another property if "they were broke"? I've no idea how they've done it, but Vaulty is a magnificent wedding venue and OCP is an award winning holiday park. I don't imagine that the lawyers worked for nothing, who worked for them when Jeremy tried to sue them.
They did not buy the property Jane, it was a trust.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2018, 05:09:PM »
They did not buy the property Jane, it was a trust.

But they must have had enough funds to live there. I don't know how that particular trust worked, but I do know that some demand that property has to be furnished and decorated to a standard, which would have required paying for up front even IF they were reimbursed later.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2018, 05:14:PM »
From the horses mouth.

"I have inherited quite a large amount of money as a result of Jeremy. And most of it I've wasted, I've spent," he said.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jan/30/jeremy-bamber-appeal-murders-evidence

Hardly from the 'horses mouth' when it's a quote in a newspaper!  ::) Has this quote been verified by anyone like the attempted selling of the explicit pictures of Sheila? (verified by Colin). It's odd that you use unsubstantiated BS to defend your own position but try to discredit others with nothing more than constant denial of facts and don't see the irony!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Adams claims
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2018, 05:27:PM »
Hardly from the 'horses mouth' when it's a quote in a newspaper!  ::) Has this quote been verified by anyone like the attempted selling of the explicit pictures of Sheila? (verified by Colin). It's odd that you use unsubstantiated BS to defend your own position but try to discredit others with nothing more than constant denial of facts and don't see the irony!

What is wrong with the Guardian? Besides it is the date that's important.

Buddy was under the impression this was said shorty after JB was convicted and that the money was spent in "such a short space of time" But that is not the case.

Spending almost £500,000 over a period of 25 or so years in nothing peculiar. Most people spend that on living (bills & food ect).