The truth has been exploited by Essex police and it's experts and prosecution witnesses!
Sheila's body on far side of bed? Ambiguous. Therefore can be 'managed
Dr Craig doesn't once mention the fact that Sheila Caffells body was on the bedroom floor! Neither does the copper who accompanied him at that time! (8.44 am), the phrases used by both parties was that Sheila's body was 'on the far side of the bed'. Since, the three letters of the word 'BED' is mentioned in the accounts attributed to them is used, not only is it logical to assume that they were referring to Sheila's body at 'that' (8.44am) time as being 'on the bed', it requires a leap of faith to imagine that what Craig and the other one saw, was Sheila's body being actually on the floor of the bedroom! Now, I wasn't there inside the bedroom when Stan Jones and Mick Clark visited there, or later on when they informed Ann Eaton, and the others gathered at Jeremy's cottage, that Neville's body was found in the kitchen, and that the bodies of the two children were found in their separate beds in a bedroom! That Sheila and June's bodies were found both laid on top of the bed side by side each other, that Sheila had only been shot once, and that on the bed in between both of their bodies was the rifle, and that there was a Bible on top of Sheila Caffells chest!
Now, I can't begin to imagine why anybody at all would want to be placing Sheila Caffells body as though it had been found on the bedroom floor, if what Jones and Clark told Ann Eaton and the others, that Sheila's body had been laid on top of the bed when they visited the main bedroom prior to leaving the scene to come with Jeremy to his cottage? Why would they tell Ann Eaton and the others the correct location of Neville Bambers body, downstairs in the kitchen, and that the two child victims were found in their beds in another bedroom, yet lie about how the bodies of Sheila and June Bamber had been laid on top of the bed in the main bedroom?
I don't have to manage the evidence, it's all been recorded in various ways by Dr Craig (8.44am), and the cop who accompanied him at that time. Also by Stan Jones and Mick Clark, and Ann Eaton it's all in the file.
Then there are the photographs and the video footage that was taken at the scene by DC Oakey and DC Henderson (the first SOC team who performed the duty of recording the positions of the bodies of Sheila and June as and when senior officers moved the bodies whilst conducting 'informatives' in that bedroom between 9.00am and 10.00am). That's why the second team of SOC (Cook, Davidson, Hammersley, and Bird) were held back and prevented from entering the crime scene and taking control of it (after 10.00am)! Cops didn't want the staged death scenes of Sheila and June in the bedroom recorded on film and footage by the same SOCO's who had photographed the two bodies on the bed together!
They had to have two teams of SOCO's, the first one (Oakey and Henderson) to record the main bedroom scene before senior officers interferred with it, and whilst moving the bodies, the gun, and the bible around, followed by the second team (Cook, Davidson, Hammersley and Bird) whose job was to record the scene as it had been left by senior officers, with a view of relying upon what the second team recorded as it had allegedly been found two hours or so, beforehand!
So, please don't try to insinuate that I am managing the evidence, it's not me that's been deceiving everybody about where Sheila Caffells body was at one time or another that morning, look no further than the dastardly Essex police!
Why did they use two different SOC teams?
Why weren't all the photographs which Oakey and Henderson took, and all the photographs that Bird took, all disclosed to the defence? The answer is a relatively simple one, because the truth of the matter is that if all 581 photographs had been disclosed to Jeremy and his legal team, Jeremy would never have stood trial, because Oakey and Henderson took the film and footage of Sheila's body on the bed and on the floor, without the gun, and with the gun, with the Bible on Sheila's chest and without the Bible on her chest! Bird took photographs after 10.00am with Sheila's body on the bedroom floor, with no Bible in her chest, but instead the rifle on top of her body!
Everything I am saying is absolutely true, and Essex police, the DPP, the CCRC and every other Tom dick and Harry at the Home Office, and within the Criminal Justice System knows what has taken place here! It's shocking, and they know that when the shit hits the fan that the general public at large will view the role of the police entirely differently! They shoot people don't they, or let's just say they have shot people, sometimes by mistake? They used to be responsible for innocent people being hanged! They forge witness statements in people's names, they charge people with offences that the person concerned committed no offence, they are violent and have a mob mentality in many cases!
There were a total of 581 photographs that were taken in connection with these investigations (SC/688/85 and SC/786/85), and yet only around 223 saw the light of day, another 358 or so were deliberately withheld many of these missing photographs show Sheila and June's bodies on the bed together with the rifle on the bed in between both bodies and with a Bible on top of Sheila's chest! Some show only Sheila's body on the bed, with June's body taken off the bed, with the rifle taken off the bed, and with the Bible taken off Sheila's chest - more importantly, the fact that Sheila had only been shot once at the time these photographs were taken!
PC Bird had to fake a false photographic schedule showing that only around 223 photographs had been taken during the police investigation, but he wasn't clever enough to pull the deception off, as per his trial testimony where he let slip that DC Oakey had taken a particular photograph of Sheila at the scene with the barrel of the gun resting against the left side of Sheila's neck!
Bird dropped a clanger which throws the validity of these murder convictions wide open!
Officially, DC Oakey and DC Henderson were never present at whf on the first morning of the police investigation - but if that were true, how did DC Oakey manage to take at least one photograph showing the guns barrel resting against the left hand side of Sheila Caffells neck at the scene?
The truth will out, the tide of corruption and dishonesty in this prosecution will soon be turning into a raging tsunami..
Time of Sheila's death? Half an hour AFTER she'd been pronounced dead....................having already been dead for several hours with two nicely neat bullet holes, just as one would expect from the weapon used to inflict themIt's not me making things up - all the evidence is there, it appears there because there are those amongst us who cannot begin to imagine or comprehend that there were two distinct investigations into these shootings, and an internal firearms enquiry into the circumstances surrounding the discharge of a police officers firearm at the time entry was gained into the kitchen (Officers Report, reference no. 1612, applies). I don't think some of those amongst us can grasp that by the time Jeremy Bamber stood trial in October 1986, that the dastardly Essex police and it's collaborators the DPP, sang from the evidence gathered during the term of the second part of the police investigation (gathered under a Crime Reference of SC/786/85) - at this stage, a totally misleading account was not only being relied upon by the prosecuting authorities and it's allies, or interested parties, but this misleading truth was fed to the unsuspecting Jury, who had no knowledge that in fact there had existed another police file, (SC/688/85) containing contradictory information and conclusions, and other evidence capable of establishing beyond reasonable doubt that the prosecutions case against Jeremy Bamber was and is a totally dishonest one!
You see, the dastardly Essex police, and the equally questionable DPP, and all other interested parties, held a dark secret which they never intended to leak out to the court which tried Jeremy Bamber as the out and outright killer! There was no hitman, no mercenary, no accomplice, no third party involvement in the killings of these poor victims!
Jeremy Bamber was portrayed as the greedy son who wanted to lay his hands on his parents wealth, sooner, rather than later!
He had carried out the killings, using the family owned .22 semi - automatic Anshuzt rifle, it's SM and 25 rounds of Ely .22 LR subsonic hollow point ammunition belonging to the family, etc, etc, etc...
It is not necessary for me to have to go over everything that was said during the 1986 trial, or even what took place at the 2002 failed appeal hearing! Save to say, that it was not until after the failed 2002 appeal that most of the fresh evidence contained in the first part of the police file (SC/688/85) fell into Jeremy Bambers and those who have represented him in one form or anothers, hands...
Since 2002, there has been a concerted effort on the part of the dastardly Essex police, the DPP and other state agencies to play down much of this previously unseen, evidence! In point of fact, 'they' have proceeded as though this previously undisclosed material had always been available to the defendant and his solicitors from the beginning!
This is a lie!!!
Jeremy Bamber was never arrested in connection with any of the evidence gathered by Essex police during the first part of the police investigation, contained in police file SC/688/85, he was not entitled to see any information gathered in that file because none of its contents related to him, or any suspicion that he had done anything untoward with regard to the circumds
His legal team were only entitled to see the evidence collected by the police which they had gathered during the second part of their investigation (SC/786/85)...
Now, back to responding to the instant Time of Sheila's death? Half an hour AFTER she'd been pronounced dead....................having already been dead for several hours with two nicely neat bullet holes, just as one would expect from the weapon used to inflict them[/i][/color]
This anomaly occurs because of previously undisclosed evidence, from the first part of the police investigation (or should I say, the police file gathered under SC/688/85)! The location at the time of first contact with Sheila Caffells was downstairs in the kitchen at the time the firearms team entered the kitchen! This was at 7.35am, and the altercation which took place involving the discharge of a police firearm in the kitchen at around that time was over and done with by 7.37am, confirmed a minute later at 7.38am! Sheila believed dead by 7.37am, onwards...
Of course, the jury never got an opportunity to consider and reject the significance of such evidence, because this evidence was never part of the SC/786/85 file used to prosecute Jeremy! Now, you can insinuate all you like about me supposedly making all of this up, but the truth is that I am not making anything up! It's evidence which has always been in the first part of the investigation (SC/688/85) that Jeremy and his solicitors were never given access to prior to the commencement of his October 1986, Chelmsford Crown Court trial, or indeed, for that matter, prior to or inclusive of the failed 2002 appeal hearing!
I do not wish to go into too much detail at this stage save to say you will need to see the 'Officers Report' concerning the shooting incident which occurred at the time of the first armed police officers entry into the kitchen at 7.35am - the report in question has a reference of '1612'...
It is not for me to have to post the contents of this report, it's supposedly withheld under pii, that is the contents of that / this report!
Why don't Jeremy's current campaign team demand it's disclosure, they are entitled to see it's contents providing that they give a legitimate explanation for why the report in question and it's contents should be disclosed, since when something is withheld under the pii rules, it does not mean that the contents of such material can never be disclosed! For example, if Jeremy's current campaign team requested that it should be disclosed, because it's contents will confirm that Jeremy Bamber could not have shot dead his sister, Sheila Caffells, and staged her death scene on the bedroom floor, and that he could not have removed a SM from the end of the guns barrel, and did so because he feared that if he had left the SM on the end of the guns barrel, it would have been possible to prove that his sister had not in fact shot and killed herself, and that 'he' Jeremy Bamber had not, in fact taken the SM all the way downstairs as alluded to by the prosecution at his October, 1986 trial, and hidden it away inside some ammunition box or other in a cupboard in a downstairs room known to the family as 'the den', because right up until 7.35am his sister had still been very much alive, that prior to the shooting incident involving a firearm officers weapon becoming involved in a shooting incident at that moment, that Jeremy Bambers sister, 'Sheila Jean Caffell' had not in fact been shot at all, and could not in fact have been killed by Jeremy Bamber more than four hours previously, as alleged!
The 'Officers Report' (1612) should be disclosed in the interests of Justice, also in the public interest, and this miscarriage of justice set straight!
No matter how much the relatives hated Jeremy, one thing is absolutely certain - and that fact is that Jeremy Bamber could not have shot and killed his sister Sheila and staged her body to fool police into thinking that she had shot and killed the others, and that he had then staged her death scene on the main bedroom floor, to fool police into thinking that his sister had taken her own life, because at 7.35am, was the very first time that Sheila had got shot by anyone!
As for Sheila's body being 'on the far side of the bed' at 8.44am when the police surgeon saw Sheila's body and mistakenly pronounced her as being dead at 'that' stage, and later on when Stan Jones saw Sheila's body laid on top of the bed, sporting one bullet wound to her neck, when Sheila had appeared so peaceful, and as though she were but sleeping thereafter, well I could go into prolific detail here, but what would be the point?
Cops shot Sheila in the kitchen, it should be clear to anyone that this is the correct interpretation of what happened - cops thought she was dead, but alas she wasn't! Next Sheila's body ended up 'on the far side of the bed' at 8.44am, at which stage a police surgeon pronounced Sheila as being dead, as a result of what appeared to be a single shot in the neck! Then there was Stan Jones, he visited the main bedroom scene and he described how he had seen Sheila Caffells body laid 'on top of the bed', looking so peaceful, as if she was merely just a sleep!
Well, she wasn't dead by that stage either...
By the time Stan Jones saw Sheila's body laid 'on top of the bed' she had not yet been shot a second time!!!
