Author Topic: Cook, Miller, Stan Jones and Ann Eaton, responsible for marking kitchen aga...  (Read 1463 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I believe that I have uncovered significant evidence which points to the fact that on the 14th August 1985, Ron Cook, Bob Miller, Stan Jones, and Ann Eaton, were the people responsible for deliberately scratching the kitchen aga surround at whf. In reaching this conclusion I have had regard to notebook entries of police officers, witness statement contents of the police officers concerned, and Ann Eatons statement that they all made to the COLP investigators. I have also read and taken on board what is recorded in Lab' records and documentation, including diagrams and notes...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I believe that I have uncovered significant evidence which points to the fact that on the 14th August 1985, Ron Cook, Bob Miller, Stan Jones, and Ann Eaton, were the people responsible for deliberately scratching the kitchen aga surround at whf. In reaching this conclusion I have had regard to notebook entries of police officers, witness statement contents of the police officers concerned, and Ann Eatons statement that they all made to the COLP investigators. I have also read and taken on board what is recorded in Lab' records and documentation, including diagrams and notes...

here's a key diagram with relevant information:-
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 10:12:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
On the 14th August 1985, when Cook, Miller and Jones told Ann Eaton that she had not seen what they had been doing, but that if anyone asked, she was to say that the police had been taking measurements in the vicinity of the kitchen aga surround...

And yet, Cook said he used a pocket knife to scrape out a paint sample (RWC/1), after which he covered the gouge with a piece of yellow coloured sticky tape!

Well, when a cast was made of that gouge mark, it contained impressions capable of matching the knurled pattern around the circumference were found in my opinion...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Cook, Miller, and Jones all stated that on that occasion the cops did not have the silencer with them when Cook took the paint sample from the kitchen aga surround with a pen knife, but he told COLP that after 13th August 1985, when Glynis Howard gave him the silencer back that he kept the silencer in his jacket pocket for the next 17 days and nights - so, he must have had the silencer with him at the scene on the 14th August 1985 when the kitchen aga got damaged (not by a pen knife, but by deliberately marking the aga surround with the end cap of the silencer)...

'Regular scratches - equally spaced'
A pen knife was not responsible for making these regular scratches - equally spaced marks, but the knurled patter on the circumference of the silencers end cap was!

« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 10:53:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
I have always maintained that those marks were made by Sheila as she underestimated the length of the rifle when avoiding her father trying to grapple it from her. Those marks would have always been there.

It was such a disgusting and a disgraceful investigation that such gouges in the paintwork had been missed because of everyone's blinkered vision focussing only on Jeremy.
As it was,the procedures in the forensic work were never carried out to the book making it a very unfair/unsafe trial. 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Many many things were missed and because it had been ruled a murder/suicide it still should have been treated and proceeded with,as a murder case------------which it hadn't been.
WHF should have been totally sealed off,disallowing anyone to enter.  It was an utter shambles.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I have always maintained that those marks were made by Sheila as she underestimated the length of the rifle when avoiding her father trying to grapple it from her. Those marks would have always been there.

It was such a disgusting and a disgraceful investigation that such gouges in the paintwork had been missed because of everyone's blinkered vision focussing only on Jeremy.
As it was,the procedures in the forensic work were never carried out to the book making it a very unfair/unsafe trial.

The thing about the silocost impressions that were taken, is that they were taken of the gouge beneath the aga kitchen shelf - where Ron Cook had used a pen knife to gouge out a paint sample that he covered by placing a piece of yellow sticky tape over it. The regular scratches - equally spaced found to be present in that gouge could not have been made by the blade of Cooks pen knife, it had to have been made by Cook gouging that indentation using the end of the silencers end cap - with its knurled pattern around its circumference!

The yellow tape he used to cover up the gouge in question, was the same piece of yellow sticky tape that Cook placed around the knurled end of the silencer which he exposed to superglue treatment on the 23rd August 1985. This piece of yellow sticky tape was examined on the 25th September 1985 at Huntingdon Lab' at the same time as a sound moderator! Of course this piece of tape did have red paint particles upon its sticky surface because Cook had originally stuck it over the gouge mark he had created on the kitchen mantle shelf previously on the 14th August 1985...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
To my mind it serves no purpose in  "deliberately" making these marks, which again could have been done by Sheila even with a silencer. One silencer had been damaged anyway and could have been used as a weapon independent of the rifle.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
To my mind it serves no purpose in  "deliberately" making these marks, which again could have been done by Sheila even with a silencer. One silencer had been damaged anyway and could have been used as a weapon independent of the rifle.

If cops were only taking measurements of the kitchen aga on the 14th August 1985, it serves no purpose for the cops to tell Ann Eaton that she had not seen whatever it was they had been doing, but if anyone asked her she was to tell them that cops had been taking measurements there..

Well, if she was being told that she had not seen the cops doing whatever it was they had been doing, and what they had been doing was taking measurements there, why then tell Ann Eton that if she's ever asked she is simply to say, cops were taking measurements of the aga?

It simply does not add up, or make any sense - cops must have been doing something naughty!
« Last Edit: December 13, 2017, 09:02:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
To my mind, cops were there in the kitchen messing around with the red painted kitchen aga shelf, Cook took a paint sample on that occasion, the references to red paint on the silencer diagram dated 13th August 1985, were added later by John Hayward (on or after 12th September 1985), once the silencer had been returned to the Lab'. The silencer was returned to the lab' on the second occasion on the 30th August 1985. This means that John Hayward must have added those comments regarding a presence of red paint ingrained into the knurl of the silencer after that date - the Lab' record has clearly been doctored and is fraudulent...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...