ive never taken much intrest in the case really on acount the fact the only personrreally defending them was mahoney and i know he tells lies.
ive never really considred eather they did or not but on the evdence she presnted at trail i would of found it hard to convict them had i been on the jury.
there most likely people to have done it certanly but weather its proven beyound reasonable doubt im not sure.
what i count agianst them is no reputable moj organisation seems to have wanted to take up the case.
The Jury heard that they gave no explanation for the calls.
The Jury heard that they gave no explanation for their whereabouts.
The Jury heard that only much later had an explanation when the damning details where given to the defence.
The Jury heard that Pats girlfiend warned Steele and Whomes that he was planning to kill them.
The Jury heard about Nicholls telling his girlfiend details about the plane shipping in the drugs to the field before Nicholls was even arrested.
The Jury heard about Steele mentioning Pats girtlfiend calling him shorly before the murders. Something only the killers would know.
How could any Jury in thier right mind acquit them?
I get the impression that Bernard Omahoney has always known they were guilty. But helped their campaign because he felt they didnt deserve to be in prison. I can sympathise with that to some extent since they done society and the police a favour by getting rid of them.
