Closing submissions in the Colin Norris/Campbell appeal are Wed 4th and Thurs 5th. One way or the other we will know imminently. An overturning of the conviction will have repercussions throughout the Criminal Justice system, in my opinion. There have been calls for reform and much discussion around the way that complex medical/scientific evidence is presented in trials. From the earlier linked booklet again below;
Lessons
Colin Norris’ case raises important questions.
• Conclusion-driven police investigations carry
an inherent risk that a miscarriage of justice
will occur. Investigators are statutorily
required to ‘pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry,
whether these point towards or away from the
suspect’29. Throughout the five years Operation
Bevil was in existence, senior police repeatedly
ignored this duty leading to the wrongful
conviction of an innocent man,
• The adversarial English criminal trial provides
an ineffective forum for testing complex
medico-scientific evidence. In 2013, the Law
Commission proposed pre-trial hearings be
established to assess the reliability of expert
evidence. Had such a system been in place in
2008, the paucity of research into non-diabetic
hypoglycaemia would have been apparent.
The proposal was supported on all sides of the
criminal justice system including prosecution
and defence lawyers. The then Secretary of
State for Justice (Christopher Grayling)
peremptorily dismissed the proposal on the
spurious ground that it would cost too much.