They have all testified during my trial, and although 2 of them have agreed that they read 'the caution' at the beginning of their witness statements, all of them gave different timings for alleged events, that are different to those they refer in their witness statements. The other witness, 'denied' reading the caution at the commencement of her own witness statement, or that the police officer who took her witness statement read the caution to her either, and she changed the alleged timing of the events dramatically by stating she had been told that the correct timing of the alleged events had been 8.40pm, not 7.30pm, because in her statement she was only estimating the time, she said it was an 'approximation' of the time, not an accurate one. Lard arse lilly then agreed the the whole episode from start to finish lasted 10 minutes, and no longer, which dropped her and the other conspirators right in it, because lard arse lilly stated that within that 10 minute period, Gemma Crooke had been taken into No.27 Fenn Road by herself, which places this event as having occurred at 8.50pm, lo and behold, at least another 10 minutes before Gemma Crookes says she had even left her own home. Talk about these lying monkeys tying themselves up in knots. I will be pressing for Samantha Hobson, Rebecca Rose, and Gemma Crookes to all be prosecuted for 'making false witness statements, all of which have been tended into evidence. If I have to appeal any convictions based on all this false evidence, the appeal will be heard in the Crown Court in front of a judge. The whole process will be reheard in front of a Crown Court Judge, with greater penalties imposed upon anyone who takes the notion that to 'falsefy the contents of a witness statement lightly should think again', I will be represented by counsel at those proceedings, and I am confident that whoever represents my interests on such occasion will give anyone responsible for lying and making false witness statements will feel the full weight of the law upon them. Lard arse lilly advanced the time she went to my neighbours house from 7.30am, to 8.40pm, she said, because 'somebody told her it was 8.40pm, not 7.30pm. When I questioned Lard arse lilly as to 'who had told her the time mentioned in her witness statement was not 7.30pm, but rather it was 8.40pm, she refused to answer, and the bench told me that it was irrelevant who had told her...
This is very interesting, because 'Lard arse Lilly' had been shopping with 'balacalava bertha', that evening and ' 'balacalava Bertha' testified to say that she had returned home from a shopping trip in the company of 'Lard arse Lilly' at 7.30pm, and that at about 8.15pm, the disturbance next door (our house) happened. So, ''balacalava Bertha' and 'Lard arse Lilly' are at odds with one another, about the time they both came back from the shopping trip they had been on. How can one of them say the time was 7.30pm, and the other say the time was 8.40pm, and both be telling the absolute truth. A one hour and ten minute time differential is a gaping hole in their made up stories. Worse still, 'Lard Arse Lilly' actual gets the time right in her witness statement version by it stating there that the time they got back to ''balacalava Bertha's' house was at 7.30pm...
So why make such a dramatic alteration to 'that' time, when she testified during the proceedings? And, who was the mysterious witness, who told her that the correct time was 'not' 7.30pm, but '8.40pm'? Why conceal the identity of the 'benefactor' who told 'Lard arse Lilly' the so called corrected time, when to do so set her account at odds with ''balacalava Bertha's' version of events?
A police officer, name of police officer, PC Simpson, the so called officer in the case. She, visited the prosecution witnesses at their homes on a specific Sunday, and told my neighbour that the timing of the '999' call made by 'ferret face fanny' was grossly out of timed sequence with ''balacalava Bertha' and 'Lard arse Lilly's' witness statement accounts, by approximately 'one hour'. This is because 'Lard arse Lily' and 'Balacalva Bertha' both state in their witness statement that they 'returned' to my neighbours house from a shopping trip at around 7.30pm, and in 'Lard arse Lily's' account the disturbance in side our house next door spilled out on the street about 40 minutes later, which places this part of the event at around 8.10pm, as opposed to ''balacalava Bertha's' account in her own witness statement pinpoints this part of the event as occurring at 8.15pm. I do not take an issue with a time difference between both accounts of a 'mere 5 minutes'...
Yet 'Ferret face fanny's' witness statement account, states that 'it was after 9pm' when she received a phone call from a friend of hers at No.21 Fenn Road (Amy) which alerted her to the disturbance up the road, at No.27, and caused her to leave her house at No.15, and go up the street to lend help to 'Balacalva Bertha' at No.27. After leaving her house at No.15, she stated on oath in court that it took her about 2 minutes to get from her residence at No.15, up Fenn Road, to the beginning of the car park situated on the left hand side of Fenn Road as you travel up the street from the general area of 'Ferret face fannys' abode, at No.15 toward ''balacalava Berthas' abode at No.27. At this juncture, 'Ferret face fanny' says bricks were thrown at her, full and half house bricks, which caused her to take refuge behind 'a red coloured car' which was parked up there on the car park, but that although the first house brick thrown at her missed her completely, that as she was crouching down behind the back of the red coloured car, that the second brick thrown at her 'struck her' on the right hand side of her back. She said all this took place within seconds of her reaching the beginning of the aforementioned car park, and that upon being struck as described, that she used her mobile telephone to dial '999'. She was then she says taken into the house at No.21 and soon afterwards she left No.21 to go up the road to No.27, and then entered 'that' property, and that it took a couple of minutes after she was struck by the brick for her to get from that part of the carpark, up the road to No.27...
Based on this account 'Ferret face fanny' had gone from leaving her house at 9pm, and ending up inside No.27 within at best '5 minutes', but at the latest, ' 10 minutes...
This places the time she says she 'ended up' at No.27 Fenn Road, at between 9.05 and 9.10pm...
This significantly contradicts the timing and sequence of events as spoken about during her testimony under oath today, or mentioned in her contradictory witness statement contents, of 'Lard arse Lillies' version(s) of events, and ''Balacalava Berthas' version of events which place the timing of the overall event, but in particular, the arrival of 'Ferret face fanny' at No. 27, after she claims she had left her home at No.15, gone up Fenn Road, arrived at the car park, been struck by a brick, dialled ''999', then onward via a visit to No.21, out and up the street into No.27...
Clearly, the three accounts of this motley crew of 'conspirators' do not only 'not add up', but it suggests in the strongest terms imaginable, that ' Lard arse Lilly', and ''balacalava Bertha' and 'Ferret face fanny' are responsible for fabricating an alleged version of events to try to cover up for the brutal attack upon me by 'Ferret face fannies' husband 'Baseball bat Wayne' to physically try to murder me...
