When I made my application to the CCRC which was turned down, the CCRC claimed that all the grounds of appeal I was invited to lodge with the registrar of the appeal court, once my case had been referred back for judgement, had all been fully considered by the full court and rejected. This was despite the judgement having mysteriously gone missing from the court of appeal file. I maintained that the only issues considered by the court of appeal were the contents of the two versions of DS Highams witness statements, one consisting of 9 pages, the other consisting of 10 pages, both dated, 25th January 1987, and the fresh forensic evidence of Philip Ryedard relating to DS Highams pocketbook, serial number, 44854. I informed the CCRC that the court of appeal refused to deal with any other ground of appeal, other than that stated by me just now. The CCRC took no notice of anything I had to say, they treated me disrespectfully. They refused to believe anything I said regarding all the additional grounds of appeal I had submitted to the registrar of appeals, despite there being no judgement about my appeal on the court of appeal file. They did not know what had happened to the judgement, how it had gone missing, when it had gone missing, but the truth of the matter is / was that there was never a full judgement made in the circumstances of my case, only an unedited version, consisting of 42 pages, dated the 11th February, 1994...
Can anyone believe that / this, they gave me an appeal, rejected it, only gave an unedited judgement, intending to give a full reserved judgement at a later time, but never did so. I now know why my appeal was dealt with in the manner it was dealt with - the processes and procedures adopted by police officers in my prosecution (1987 / 1992) with regard to the contents of witness statements, and abuse relating to dodgy pocketbook entries, were used in the Hillsborough tragedy cover up (1989)...
In the early 1990's, I lodged a complaint against the then Chief Constable, Richard Wells, regarding him encouraging his officers (South Yorkshire Police) to falsify witness statement contents, falsify pocketbook entries, and to commit perjury in court proceedings whilst testifying. I made this complaint knowing that the same or similar tactics adopted by South Yorkshire police, against me had also been adopted against other people, and in particular, adopted to help cover up responsibility for what occurred during the Hillsborough disaster. In 1995, the then PCA wrote to me informing me that the PCA had decided to grant a dispensation from the need to investigate my complaint against the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire police, because they regarded my complaint as an abuse of process...
