Clearly you have absolutely nothing to back up this rubbish.
Hillsborough and the subsequent lies which prevailed for so long have absolutely nothing to do with your arrest.
The truth came out over 23 years later following incredible work done by the families, HFSG, HJC and many others, leading to the Hillsborough Independent Panel releasing their report on the disaster on September 12 2012.
To claim 'credit' that the lies and real truth were not revealed earlier was because of you is not only wrong, but insensitive, grossly misleading and deeply distressing for those who suffered at and as a result of Hillsborough.
By all means argue your own case, but don't attempt to link yourself to Hillsborough, without compelling evidence, as this is very insensitive and hurtful.
Imagine how victims of the dead feel if they read this. "Well everything we did is worthless. The truth would have come out crystal clear, years ago but for some guy called Mike!" - HURTFUL, MISLEADING, INSENSITIVE, DISRESEPCTFUL AND WRONG
JFT96
First of all, stop speaking to me with that awful tone of yours, you do not know what you are talking about. Of course my case is linked to the methods adopted by South Yorkshire police who altered the contents of witness statements, without the knowledge of the named witnesses. Stop talking crap, you have no idea about what you are talking about. Falsifying of witness statement contents had been ongoing long before the events at Hillsboro' in 1989. The police in South Yorkshire had been falsifying the contents of witness statements years before Hillsboro' happened, and bird brain, in my own cases, so shut the fuck up, Lets get the facts right, about when the tamperings with the contents of police witness evidence had occurred in my own cases, and Hillsboro'...
5th December, 1985 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
22nd January 1986 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
29th January 1986 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
19th March 1986 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
15th August 1986 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
25th January 1987 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
1989 - Hillsboro' - this is your interest, in falsifying/altering of witness statement contents
9th July 1991 - my case (altering of witness statement contents)
What gives you the divine right to say it was wrong for police to edit and falsify the contents of witness statements when it refers to Hillsboro', but not to any of my cases, I was a victim of this sort of corruption long before the shit hit the fan with Hillsboro'...
You want to fucking waken up boy, police corruption in South Yorkshire did not start with Hillsboro', it had been ongoing in the district long beforehand, and Inquest verdicts have been quashed because police tampered with these witness statement contents, but there are others, and I am one of them, where convictions have been secured by a reliance on the same kind of shit and disturbing practice of tampering with the contents of witness statements and our convictions or shall I say verdicts have not yet been quashed...
Tell me big boy, what is the difference between what happened in Hillsboro', and what happened to me, and many others, are you saying that it was alright to tamper with the contents of police witness statements in our cases, but not in Hillsboro', since if you are, basically, FUCK OFF...