Julia Jeapes

[Jane]

Sheila wouldn't have been seeing straight because of her " red mist " rage.

 

[Caroline]

Sheila wouldn't have been seeing straight because of her " red mist " rage.

I see, so she needed the lights but Jeremy didn't? 

[lookout]

You've heard of the saying " blinded by rage ".This is probably what happened to Sheila.

[Stephanie]

Sheila wouldn't have been seeing straight because of her " red mist " rage.

But you said her iron levels were fine, no anaemia etc. Though I haven't seen any evidence to show beyond reasonable doubt her iron levels were fine etc

[Jane]

Sheila wouldn't have been seeing straight because of her " red mist " rage.

A thought occurs. How would she have known she wasn't seeing straight when she was consumed by "her "red mist" rage"?

[Stephanie]

You've heard of the saying " blinded by rage ".This is probably what happened to Sheila.

She was mentruating Lookout! She was exhausted! Read Colin's letter he wrote to NB but didn't send. She had been struggling to get out of bed. No mention of mood swings or rages!

[Kaldin]

Off topic already.

Now about Julia Jeapes' statement. She thought she saw what appeared to be a rifle in the window of the box room. Is that at all feasible?

[Stephanie]

A thought occurs. How would she have known she wasn't seeing straight when she was consumed by "her "red mist" rage"?

Good point! That throws the theory of her being a crack shot out the window

[lookout]

But you said her iron levels were fine, no anaemia etc. Though I haven't seen any evidence to show beyond reasonable doubt her iron levels were fine etc

Look at Vanezis's report.No sign of anaemia with her blood test.

[Kaldin]

Most lights were on from what I can gather. Something which I very much doubt that JB would have done while " killing " everyone. Why would you need light when you knew the place like the back of your hand ?

I think the killer would need the lights to be on lookout - I'd be more suspicious if all the lights were off really.

Anyway, if there was a light on in the box room, someone must have used that room, possibly to go to or from the boys' bedroom.

[guest2181]

I think the killer would need the lights to be on lookout - I'd be more suspicious if all the lights were off really.

Anyway, if there was a light on in the box room, someone must have used that room, possibly to go to or from the boys' bedroom.

Or the light from the main bedroom shone though an open door.

[Caroline]

Off topic already.

Now about Julia Jeapes' statement. She thought she saw what appeared to be a rifle in the window of the box room. Is that at all feasible?

You didn't expect that it would stay on topic did you?  I don't think she saw a rifle, they were all geared and aware there were guns on the premises.

[Kaldin]

You didn't expect that it would stay on topic did you?  I don't think she saw a rifle, they were all geared and aware there were guns on the premises.

Well it would have been nice for people to say on topic for a couple of pages at least. 

I don't think that Julia Jeapes made any other statements, so I think she might have been mistaken. It's a pity she didn't clarify what she meant.

[lookout]

I think the killer would need the lights to be on lookout - I'd be more suspicious if all the lights were off really.

Anyway, if there was a light on in the box room, someone must have used that room, possibly to go to or from the boys' bedroom.

Possibly only if they were staying within the premises,but not for the purpose of breaking in to kill.

[Caroline]

Or the light from the main bedroom shone though an open door.

I just said that! 

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8697.msg416456.html#msg416456