0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No suggestion of low iron levels,anaemia,as Sheila was a well nourished woman according to Vanezis.
There was no suggestion that she was bleeding heavily either.
NO, there wasn't. It was a suggestion put forward by Mike along with a bucket full of blood as opposed to a bucket of water coloured by bloodied underwear soaking in it.
Mr Vanezis said there was a small amount of blood in her uterus, so that doesn't suggest she was bleeding heavily.
I've never suggested she was. The onset of menstruation isn't necessarily indicated by a heavy sudden rush -the flow may be at it's heaviest further on- but nonetheless, accidents occur/tampons leak.
No sign of anaemia in her blood test in his report.
I don't know where this business about tampons leaking has come from. There's no suggestion that Sheila's tampon leaked, and even if it did, why is that relevant?
A leaking tampon will leave the same signs in underwear as will the sudden onset of menstruation. I've lost track of whatever point it is that's trying to be proved.
Blame your mate for starting it. Then ask her what her point was.
I don't know if it's signficant or not that Sheila had started her period. There have been reports of women getting aggressive because of hormones, so that's possible, but there's no proof of that.
You've only to see your posts this morning---------I wasn't even part of the furore !! You ALL made a beeline for Kaldin.