0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Statements were suspiciously similar.
Which means what?
Very nearly copied as probably whoever typed them had assumed that because all officers were at the scene that everything was the same.
I'm not suggesting that anything was invented, I'm just questioning the procedure. If witnesses are not using their own words, anything could be misunderstood or misinterpreted.
If they sign them, then are they not therefore taking responsibility and endorsing the contents?Julie didn't write out her own statements.
And if they use their own words and/or their phraseology differs from their colleagues', that, too, could be misunderstood or misinterpreted.
Well then they can be questioned about what they meant.
Surely statements are at least dictated by the witness.
Then if notes appear significantly similar, they too may be questioned.
These are the " notes " which have obviously been withheld. What had been originally presented was no doubt done from memory. Why did that officer break down during questioning BTW ?
DC Hammersley? It was at the COLP interviews wasn't it? I'm not sure why, but I hope he recovered - he sounded quite distressed going by the account of it.