Author Topic: Why wasn't crispy shot?  (Read 40368 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #180 on: October 18, 2017, 09:27:PM »
The physical and emotional effort of all those hours-the telephone calls, the murders themselves, the journey to and from White House Farm, the further telephone call to Chelmsford, then the deceitful conversations with Police: all have taken their toll, and now he is sitting back, almost thinking out loud about the treat he will pamper himself with.

Thanks to Stephanie for the link to cognitive thinking: https://bigthink.com/delancey-place/the-two-systems-of-cognitive-processes

Small talk to take his mind off things probably.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #181 on: October 18, 2017, 09:29:PM »
JB would have been covered in dog bites around his ankles/hands,if he had been shooing it away-------was he ? Crispy would have thought he was playing. ?
Nobody in that farmhouse was bitten ? Because it was used to them.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #182 on: October 18, 2017, 09:34:PM »
JB would have been covered in dog bites around his ankles/hands,if he had been shooing it away-------was he ? Crispy would have thought he was playing. ?
Nobody in that farmhouse was bitten ? Because it was used to them.
It might have been frightened by the shots and hidden under the bed, which is where Police found him. The dog was probably used to Jeremy's smell anyway. Did Julie check Jeremy's ankles for nip marks? I doubt it.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44413
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #183 on: October 18, 2017, 09:35:PM »
JB would have been covered in dog bites around his ankles/hands,if he had been shooing it away-------was he ? Crispy would have thought he was playing. ?
Nobody in that farmhouse was bitten ? Because it was used to them.

That's a good point. Sheila was bare footed & her nightie only reached her knees.

Not only were her feet & legs spotless & undamaged, but there were no bite marks around her ankles.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #184 on: October 18, 2017, 09:37:PM »
That's a good point. Sheila was bare footed & her nightie only reached her knees.

Not only were her feet & legs spotless & undamaged, but there were no bite marks around her ankles.
Yes it does work both ways.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44413
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #185 on: October 18, 2017, 09:38:PM »
It might have been frightened by the shots and hidden under the bed, which is where Police found him. The dog was probably used to Jeremy's smell anyway. Did Julie check Jeremy's ankles for nip marks? I doubt it.

Bamber was in shoes or boots & socks. If Crispy came near him, he would give it a boot or a swipe with the rifle. He hit Nevill hard enough with it.

He said he would use June's bible to swot Crispy with.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #186 on: October 18, 2017, 09:45:PM »
The physical and emotional effort of all those hours-the telephone calls, the murders themselves, the journey to and from White House Farm, the further telephone call to Chelmsford, then the deceitful conversations with Police: all have taken their toll, and now he is sitting back, almost thinking out loud about the treat he will pamper himself with.

You never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Thanks to Stephanie for the link to cognitive thinking: https://bigthink.com/delancey-place/the-two-systems-of-cognitive-processes

Thanks to Stephanie the forum is littered with meaningless psychobabble.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #187 on: October 18, 2017, 09:46:PM »
Bamber was in shoes or boots & socks. If Crispy came near him, he would give it a boot or a swipe with the rifle. He hit Nevill hard enough with it.

He said he would use June's bible to swot Crispy with.







No damage to the dog.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #188 on: October 18, 2017, 09:57:PM »
The physical and emotional effort of all those hours-the telephone calls, the murders themselves, the journey to and from White House Farm, the further telephone call to Chelmsford, then the deceitful conversations with Police: all have taken their toll, and now he is sitting back, almost thinking out loud about the treat he will pamper himself with.

Thanks to Stephanie for the link to cognitive thinking: https://bigthink.com/delancey-place/the-two-systems-of-cognitive-processes
You might find this book of interest Steve.
 https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/psychology-of-intelligence-analysis/index.html
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #189 on: October 18, 2017, 09:59:PM »
You never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Thanks to Stephanie the forum is littered with meaningless psychobabble.

That'll be the same "meaningless psychobabble" that increased Bamber's life tarif to a whole life tarif

And the same "meaningless psychobabble" that stops you from seeing further than your cognitive bias
« Last Edit: October 18, 2017, 10:02:PM by Stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44413
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #190 on: October 18, 2017, 10:01:PM »






No damage to the dog.

Who knows.

Certainly no bullets in Crispy. Sheila being aggitated to shoot sleeping women & children instead.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2017, 10:02:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #191 on: October 18, 2017, 10:06:PM »
Who knows.

Certainly no bullets in Crispy. Sheila being aggitated to shoot sleeping women & children instead.







Some people are odd about animals you know. What about those who risk their lives in a raging sea to rescue their dogs,only to drown ?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44413
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #192 on: October 18, 2017, 10:09:PM »






Some people are odd about animals you know. What about those who risk their lives in a raging sea to rescue their dogs,only to drown ?

Oh yes.

I forgot about those people who risk their lives in raging seas to rescue their dogs. Only to drown.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #193 on: October 18, 2017, 10:20:PM »
Small talk to take his mind off things probably.

As I believe JB is innocent then this is all rubbish

If in your fairytale we could believe you why have left out the most deceitful person mugford
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #194 on: October 18, 2017, 10:21:PM »
You never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Thanks to Stephanie the forum is littered with meaningless psychobabble.
Ditto
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000