Why wasn't crispy shot?

[Adam]

why wouldent crispy have bitten jeremy if had brocken in.

Because it wasn't a guard dog, was asleep & behind a closed door.

[nugnug]

Because it wasn't a guard dog, was asleep & behind a closed door.

but he allegedly doesnt like jeremy.

[Adam]

Talking of Bamber breaking in.

CAL book said Bamber used a hack saw blade to flick open the window catch. By coincidence a hack saw blade was found near the bathroom window.

Bamber confirmed it was his.

[Adam]

but he allegedly doesnt like jeremy.

I have no idea whether it liked Bamber or not.

However it wasn't a guard dog, would be asleep & behind a closed door.

[Kaldin]

It's here: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zV3WCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA170&lpg=PA170&dq=jeremy+bamber+pc+lay&source=bl&ots=jQz_L0BdvW&sig=F6NS_8gn1igNBhqSjWlh6N9nG2w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi59eeOyfrWAhWCzBoKHWrsCSUQ6AEIXDAN#v=onepage&q=jeremy%20bamber%20pc%20lay&f=false

Before he was told his family was dead then. In that case, it means nothing.

[Steve_uk]

Before he was told his family was dead then. In that case, it means nothing.

Not at all: it's more damning the remarks came when they did. It illustrates that he knew all occupants of the house were dead and none of them could gainsay any of the lies emanating from his mouth at that stage. It's also an indication of how he was going to proceed in the aftermath.

[Kaldin]

Not at all: it's more damning the remarks came when they did. It illustrates that he knew all occupants of the house were dead and none of them could gainsay any of the lies emanating from his mouth at that stage. It's also an indication of how he was going to proceed in the aftermath.

I don't agree with that. He's just talking while they're waiting, and the police officer encouraged him to do so. Besides, all that is from a book. Are there any statements about it?

[Steve_uk]

I don't agree with that. He's just talking while they're waiting, and the police officer encouraged him to do so. Besides, all that is from a book. Are there any statements about it?

It suggests that he knew he was about to inherit a large sum of money. It's from PC Robert Lay's statement of 1 October 1985.

[Kaldin]

It suggests that he knew he was about to inherit a large sum of money. It's from PC Robert Lay's statement of 1 October 1985.

I can't find that statement.

[Steve_uk]

I can't find that statement.

That's not surprising, since we don't have it in the archives.

[Kaldin]

That's not surprising, since we don't have it in the archives.

So there's no evidence of what was said.

I disregard this kind of tittle tattle really.

[lookout]

why wouldent crispy have bitten jeremy if had brocken in.

It certainly would have done as it had bitten him before and  that's why he didn't like the dog.

[Caroline]

Before he was told his family was dead then. In that case, it means nothing.

How does it mean nothing? If he killed them he knew they were dead.

[Kaldin]

How does it mean nothing? If he killed them he knew they were dead.

If he didn't kill them, he didn't know they were dead, or he hoped they weren't. The point is that it's not evidence of anything.

[Steve_uk]

If he didn't kill them, he didn't know they were dead, or he hoped they weren't. The point is that it's not evidence of anything.

The physical and emotional effort of all those hours-the telephone calls, the murders themselves, the journey to and from White House Farm, the further telephone call to Chelmsford, then the deceitful conversations with Police: all have taken their toll, and now he is sitting back, almost thinking out loud about the treat he will pamper himself with.

Thanks to Stephanie for the link to cognitive thinking: https://bigthink.com/delancey-place/the-two-systems-of-cognitive-processes