Brett Collins's published interview with The Sun:

[David1819]

I just gave you 7 sources about what happened & what was said.

But appreciate that won't be enough for a conspiracy theorist.

It don't count if you make those sources up or falsely attribute them to people.

You gave six "sources" Fielder, Bamber, Brett, CAL, The Sun and Sheila's friend.

Fielder and the Sun are one of the same and CALs source is Sheila's friend so that Narrows it down to four sources.

The Sun and Fielder are not credible sources. The fact you use the Sun newspaper as evidence is laughable.

Sheila's friend only mentions the existence of those photos.

Then you have Brett and Bamber who have never said what you are attributing to them.

So you have provided zero sources. Unless you consider the Sun newspaper a source. Then you have one "source"

[Adam]

What I wonder is did brett contact the sun or did the sun contact him.

Brett contacted The Sun. You know this.

[Adam]

It don't count if you make those sources up or falsely attribute them to people.

You gave six "sources" Fielder, Bamber, Brett, CAL, The Sun and Sheila's friend.

Fielder and the Sun are one of the same and CALs source is Sheila's friend so that Narrows it down to four sources.

The Sun and Fielder are not credible sources. The fact you use the Sun newspaper as evidence is laughable.

Sheila's friend only mentions the existence of those photos.

Then you have Brett and Bamber who have never said what you are attributing to them.

So you have provided zero sources. Unless you consider the Sun newspaper a source. Then you have one "source"

You forgot CC who I mentioned. Who has said the pictures exist. So seven sources. Learn to count.

Fielder is an individual. The Sun a national paper - 2 sources.

CAL interviewed Bamber, Brett & Sheila's friend.

You've quoted from CAL's book enough times. Is it now wrong ?

[Adam]

Sources that the meeting happened:

Bamber
Brett
Fielder
CAL.
The CT.
Numerous other sources from the last 32 years.

Sources of what was said

Fielder
The Sun
CAL.

Sources that the photo's existed:

CAL
Sheila's friend.
CC.
Fielder.
The Sun.

[nugnug]

Brett contacted The Sun. You know this.

nothing of the sort is known.

[Adam]

nothing of the sort is known.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zV3WCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA320&lpg=PA320&dq=jeremy+bamber+meeting+with+the+sun&source=bl&ots=jQzXO1FcuY&sig=qp_eX-zfphdOv2ZqDsEy_Mukpfg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZsaDKsqzWAhUPZFAKHQAnArgQ6AEIZDAR

Now if you can provide a source that Fielder contacted Bamber.....

[nugnug]

Sources that the meeting happened:

Bamber
Brett
Fielder
CAL.
The CT.
Numerous other sources from the last 32 years.

Sources of what was said

Fielder
The Sun
CAL.

Sources that the photo's existed:

CAL
Sheila's friend.
CC.

fielder and the  sun are the same source carol ann lee was not there and was only repeated what feilder said so that leads feilder as the only source.


this is desprate beyound belief.
Fielder.
The Sun.

[Adam]

How many sources have you ever supplied ? Oh yes. None.

[Adam]

nothing of the sort is known.

https://youtu.be/bcTvqLk0MWU

Source from Fielder. But as you said Fielder lied for no reason & Bamber never has.

[Steve_uk]

Why not just accept that the incident happened? It's not conclusive proof he is guilty of mass murder, but is indicative of his character. Any denial makes the adherents of Bamber look rather desperate..

[Adam]

Why not just accept that the incident happened? It's not conclusive proof he is guilty of mass murder, but is indicative of his character. Any denial makes the adherents of Bamber look rather desperate..

I think Nugs is the only person kicking & screaming.

He's accepted there was a meeting & Bamber may have wanted to give his side of the story.

However doesn't accept CAL & Fielder saying that Bamber wanted £20,000+ for photos & his life story.

Nugs has not said why Bamber wouldn't offer his story for free.

[nugnug]

https://youtu.be/bcTvqLk0MWU

Source from Fielder. But as you said Fielder lied for no reason & Bamber never has.

fielder lied to get a good just he lied in other cases like the death on the rock this as we have mentioned many hes a proven liar.

why the hell would I belive is telling the truth in this case.

[lookout]

C'mon,it reeks of desperation and as far as I remember the description of " sexual predator " as JB was named by Fielder,wasn't even mentioned in the courtroom,and that's a charge on its own.

[nugnug]

I think Nugs is the only person kicking & screaming.

He's accepted there was a meeting & Bamber may have wanted to give his side of the story.

However doesn't accept CAL & Fielder saying that Bamber wanted £20,000+ for photos & his life story.

Nugs has not said why Bamber wouldn't offer his story for free.

because nobody with a working brian cell belives the word of somebody who has been proven to have lied before. and fielder has.

[Adam]

fielder lied to get a good just he lied in other cases like the death on the rock this as we have mentioned many hes a proven liar.

why the hell would I belive is telling the truth in this case.

That's fine. You believe a convicted murderer & liar instead. 

Fielder lied & offerred to commit perjury in court. The Sun lied & risked libel action.

Was Fielder lying when he said there was a meeting ? No

Was Fielder lying when he said photo's existed ? No.

Was Fielder lying when he said he didn't see the photos ? No.

Do you agree with Fielder that Bamber would want to give his side of the story ? Yes.


But Fielder has apparently lied in the past on unrelated matters. So must have lied here.  Like no one ever a lied in their lives.