Author Topic: The Bible  (Read 68855 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Bible
« Reply #870 on: October 07, 2017, 09:43:AM »
If you haven't read the statements, you can't possibly know if they're the same or not, and therefore I conclude that you're just trying to cause trouble.






I can concur with that.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: The Bible
« Reply #871 on: October 07, 2017, 07:31:PM »
If you haven't read the statements, you can't possibly know if they're the same or not, and therefore I conclude that you're just trying to cause trouble.

Please point me to where it says I've never read the statements before you go off making assumptions
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The Bible
« Reply #872 on: October 07, 2017, 07:38:PM »
Please point me to where it says I've never read the statements before you go off making assumptions

You ignoring my posts didn't last long did it? Now you've bumped a post which is hours old and which you've read before.

You clearly didn't read them because otherwise you'd know they were the same.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: The Bible
« Reply #873 on: October 07, 2017, 07:43:PM »
You ignoring my posts didn't last long did it? Now you've bumped a post which is hours old and which you've read before.

You clearly didn't read them because otherwise you'd know they were the same.

When did I read it before? I'd only just seen it
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The Bible
« Reply #874 on: October 07, 2017, 07:46:PM »
When did I read it before? I'd only just seen it

And you just thought you'd bump it because you're soooo offended. Righto.  :))

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The Bible
« Reply #875 on: October 07, 2017, 08:08:PM »
Statement from Collins - opps! He states that the rifle was ON her body!  ;)

So she got the wrong officer.  It was Adams.  Collins queried the position of bible and head.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Bible
« Reply #876 on: October 07, 2017, 08:11:PM »
So she got the wrong officer.  It was Adams.  Collins queried the position of bible and head.

"Queried"
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The Bible
« Reply #877 on: October 07, 2017, 08:19:PM »
"Queried"

Delgado claims he and Adams had 'real concerns'.  We've been here before haven't we?  What you choose to brush aside as nothing, I choose to view differently.

In my opinion, the TFG vacated her crime scene and SOCO / detectives took over.  SOCO and detectives contrived a different positioning than the one vacated by TFG.  Hence, TFG later questioned as to why the crime scene had altered - because they immediately recognised from the images that something was wrong.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2017, 08:20:PM by Roch »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Bible
« Reply #878 on: October 07, 2017, 08:21:PM »
Delgado claims he and Adams had 'real concerns'.  We've been here before haven't we?  What you choose to brush aside as nothing, I choose to view differently.

In my opinion, the TFG vacated her crime scene and SOCO / detectives took over.  SOCO and detectives contrived a different positioning than that of the one vacated by TFG.  Hence, TFG later questioned as to why the crime scene had altered - because they immediately recognised from the images that something was wrong.
How many officers didn't query it? They contrived a different scene - err why?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The Bible
« Reply #879 on: October 07, 2017, 08:22:PM »
Delgado claims he and Adams had 'real concerns'.  We've been here before haven't we?  What you choose to brush aside as nothing, I choose to view differently.

In my opinion, the TFG vacated her crime scene and SOCO / detectives took over. SOCO and detectives contrived a different positioning than the one vacated by TFG.  Hence, TFG later questioned as to why the crime scene had altered - because they immediately recognised from the images that something was wrong.
Roch why would they want to do this?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Bible
« Reply #880 on: October 07, 2017, 08:26:PM »
Roch why would they want to do this?

I think we would all like to know that?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The Bible
« Reply #881 on: October 07, 2017, 08:27:PM »
How many officers didn't query it? They contrived a different scene - err why?

How many is not possible to say. Delgado says they were 'unhappy as a group'.

I wasn't there so cannot comment on why. As you are already aware, speculation abounds regarding something having gone wrong.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2017, 08:36:PM by Roch »

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The Bible
« Reply #882 on: October 07, 2017, 08:38:PM »
Roch why would they want to do this?

I think we would all like to know that?

I think 99% of the forum would want to know that.   

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Bible
« Reply #883 on: October 07, 2017, 09:14:PM »
I think 99% of the forum would want to know that.

And who wouldn't?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The Bible
« Reply #884 on: October 07, 2017, 09:20:PM »
And who wouldn't?

Hartley for one.  There may be others.  I'm not sure what 1% of our forum members actually is.  If Ann Eaton is still included, she'd be another.