Author Topic: " Fresh evidence uncovered ",as stated in todays Essex and Colchester Gazette.  (Read 30453 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Well,at least we can agree on that then - but somebody made a 999 call from inside the farmhouse to the control room at 6.09am, and for what its worth that person could not possibly have been Jeremy Bamber, seems to me to almost certainly have been Sheila Caffell, can't see how it could have been June Bamber if there wasn't a phone upstairs in the main bedroom by that stage...

There is no proof of a call Mike.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Nobody made a 999 call. The available evidence (including Jean Rowe's) makes it obvious that a log reference to 999 was a mistake by a police officer.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Well,at least we can agree on that then - but somebody made a 999 call from inside the farmhouse to the control room at 6.09am, and for what its worth that person could not possibly have been Jeremy Bamber, seems to me to almost certainly have been Sheila Caffell, can't see how it could have been June Bamber if there wasn't a phone upstairs in the main bedroom by that stage...

You can go on saying it for as long as you like, but it won't mean it ever happened.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Nobody made a 999 call. The available evidence (including Jean Rowe's) makes it obvious that a log reference to 999 was a mistake by a police officer.






How many mistakes is/was that----can you list them ? This was a murder trial.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076





How many mistakes is/was that----can you list them ? This was a murder trial.

There were lots, no one is saying there weren't any but that's a far cry from such mistakes leading to a MOJ.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Common forms of misconduct by law enforcement officials :

Employing suggestion when conducting identification procedures.
Coercing false confessions.
Lying or intentionally misleading jurors about their observations.
Failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to prosecutors.
Providing incentives to secure unreliable evidence from informants.

Common forms of misconduct by prosecutors include :

Withholding exculpatory evidence from the defence.
Deliberately mishandling,mistreating or destroying evidence.
Allowing witnesses they know or should know are not truthful to testify.
Pressuring defence witnesses not to testify.
Relying on fraudulent forensic experts.
Making misleading arguments that overstate the probative value of testimony.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
This is our Justice System of which there is no safeguard in the prevention of MOJ's occurring. Corrupt !!

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
This is our Justice System of which there is no safeguard in the prevention of MOJ's occurring. Corrupt !!

Actually, no it isn't  ;D. This is the site you pasted the info from https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/government-misconduct/

Had you read more of it, you would have found that it is referring to the USA
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13705
Actually, no it isn't  ;D. This is the site you pasted the info from https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/government-misconduct/

Had you read more of it, you would have found that it is referring to the USA

The same applies here. Their legal system is based on ours.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Nobody made a 999 call. The available evidence (including Jean Rowe's) makes it obvious that a log reference to 999 was a mistake by a police officer.

I disagree, there certainly was a '999' call, and the officer who's task it was to monitor it, did make a witness statement but at a meeting between Essex police and the DPP, they decided to not seek to rely on that officers evidence! Now, if that officer wasn't monitoring a 999 call, why wouldn't Essex police and the DPP want him to testify about the call he was monitoring, what he heard, etc, etc, etc...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
The same applies here. Their legal system is based on ours.






That's right,apart from the death sentence in certain states. Also Death Row is akin to those here who serve long sentences while suffering MOJ's. I would liken such sentences as a slow death to those innocents who are locked up.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
It's still Government misconduct whichever country it is and there ARE some corrupt Governments.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
The same applies here. Their legal system is based on ours.

Really? Your report is based on the palm print  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076





That's right,apart from the death sentence in certain states. Also Death Row is akin to those here who serve long sentences while suffering MOJ's. I would liken such sentences as a slow death to those innocents who are locked up.

The US legal system is quite different from ours.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
The US legal system is quite different from ours.






The sentiments are the same.