tonights the night.

[Jan]

I don't quite follow.

She had no idea Bamber was guilty, but told 5 people. Then decided to approach the police & give a false WS a month after the massacre ?

How is that 'saving her skin' ?

Let's look at this another way. The main story that Julie allegedly gave was about the hitman .

There was never a hitman

The story was false and yet she knew money amounts phone calls things that happened while the hitman was in the house .


Why ? That is the question you should be asking why ?

[Adam]

There were lots of conversations going on between family police and friends that were not recorded . We don't know everything in detail . Even Colin got told by mistake what was happening when Jeremy got arrested by the family and not the police . Work it out .

My question of how Julie was 'saving her skin' by approaching the police when Bamber was innocent has not been answered.

I've worked out you have no answer.

[Adam]

Let's look at this another way. The main story that Julie allegedly gave was about the hitman .

There was never a hitman

The story was false and yet she knew money amounts phone calls things that happened while the hitman was in the house .


Why ? That is the question you should be asking why ?

My question of how Julie was 'saving her skin' by approaching the police when Bamber was innocent has not been answered. 

There are already threads on why Bamber introduced MM.

[Jan]

My question of how Julie was 'saving her skin' by approaching the police when Bamber was innocent has not been answered.

I've worked out you have no answer.

Yes I have said.

She could have been told that he was about to be arrested and put in the frame and that she could be considered an accomplice .

That's why

And let's face this fact even if her statements are from information fed to her and embellishment and only have a ring of truth she never could have been 100% sure of his innocence could she ? Because she was not with him on the night?

So in her heart of hearts she may have known what she was saying was wrong , but she had been convinced she was doing the right thing .
 

[Adam]

Yes I have said.

She could have been told that he was about to be arrested and put in the frame and that she could be considered an accomplice .

That's why

And let's face this fact even if her statements are from information fed to her and embellishment and only have a ring of truth she never could have been 100% sure of his innocence could she ? Because she was not with him on the night?

So in her heart of hearts she may have known what she was saying was wrong , but she had been convinced she was doing the right thing .

So Bamber had never spoken to Julie about the massacre. But she was apparently tipped off that Bamber was about to arrested.

So she approached the police (after already telling 5 people). To create a false WS & commit perjury at trial.

Apparently she was now an accomplice on a crime that Bamber had never discussed with her.
 

[Jan]

So Bamber had never spoken to Julie about the massacre. But she was apparently tipped off that Bamber was about to arrested.

So she approached the police (after already telling 5 people). To create a false WS & commit perjury at trial.

Apparently she was now an accomplice on a crime that Bamber had never discussed with her.

No . You are conveniently ignoring what I said about the ring of truth . Are you being deliberately obtrusive or do you really not get it?

What is your answer to why the only things she did say were about a hitman that did not exist ?

Open your mind ?

Perhaps she was told that by someone else beside Jeremy ?

Or what is your theory?

[Adam]

No . You are conveniently ignoring what I said about the ring of truth . Are you being deliberately obtrusive or do you really not get it?

What is your answer to why the only things she did say were about a hitman that did not exist ?

Open your mind ?

Perhaps she was told that by someone else beside Jeremy ?

Or what is your theory?

Are you deliberately talking rubbish again or do you just not get it ?

I'm going to have to create a thread on Julie approaching the police after telling 5 people, because she 'wanted to save her skin'.

You're answers are weak.

[Steve_uk]

Yes I have said.

She could have been told that he was about to be arrested and put in the frame and that she could be considered an accomplice .

That's why

And let's face this fact even if her statements are from information fed to her and embellishment and only have a ring of truth she never could have been 100% sure of his innocence could she ? Because she was not with him on the night?

So in her heart of hearts she may have known what she was saying was wrong , but she had been convinced she was doing the right thing .

I can just imagine what all the innocent brigade would say had she shared a bed with him on the Tuesday night..

[Jan]

Are you deliberately talking rubbish again or do you just not get it ?

I'm going to have to create a thread on Julie approaching the police after telling 5 people, because she 'wanted to save her skin'.

You're answers are weak.

No you are just not understanding.

What was the information she gave to the 5 friends . Start from there.

[Jan]

Are you deliberately talking rubbish again or do you just not get it ?

I'm going to have to create a thread on Julie approaching the police after telling 5 people, because she 'wanted to save her skin'.

You're answers are weak.

Adam , I am sure you are adult enough to tell me if our discussions are getting too much for you  because I have been accused about having a go at you .


So rather than saying my posts are rubbish or weak please feel free to comment if you feel my posts are nasty or personal.

i will try not to get personal with you and visa versa.

I am sure you are capable of that ?

[lookout]

Blimey,it beggars belief that you,Jan,have had a go at anyone.

[Jan]

Well Adams not worried enough to reply , so hey ho , carry on .

[Steve_uk]

It might be a start for everyone to turn over a new leaf as the anniversary of the massacre approaches.

[Jan]

It might be a start for everyone to turn over a new leaf as the anniversary of the massacre approaches.

Yes that is a good point Steve .

[Caroline]

It might be a start for everyone to turn over a new leaf as the anniversary of the massacre approaches.

That is something that could only last temporarily I'm afraid.