Says you, Adam but that is just your opinion.
I have to agree with much of Kaldin's reasoning and don't believe that means I am blaming JM more than JB.
I have always found JM's behavour hard to get to grips with, I am aware that if JB is a psychopathic type of personality then he would have the ability to hypnotise/put her in a trance state. This is what a true psychopath can do and she would be unaware of it happening.
As we don't know if JB is a psychopath I cannot see how we can know for sure that this happened to JM but it is a possibility which has to be considered imo.
What reasoning ?
Kaldin just keeps repeating that she would have acted differently to Julie.
Apparently cut off from him from day one, not worn a veil at the funeral, acted differently when Bamber rang her at 3am, not identified the twins & not allowed herself to be whisked around by Bamber for 20 days.
It's good that someone can be so certain of what they would do at the age of 20 in a situation they have never been in before.
Not that Kaldin's different reactions overturns Bamber's conviction, represents everyone or means Julie is wrong.