DCI 621 Stuart Smith Specsavers Challenge

[lookout]

Who made the prints on her nightdress if her hands were clean ?

[Steve_uk]

There have been posts on here before that actually said it is an easy rifle to fire and to be fair we can not see all her nails so we only have reports that say they were not damaged . It also says her hands were clean and there is no way that is true is it? Perhaps they were by the time the autopsy happened?

If Sheila's nails were damaged this would have confirmed the boss's suspicions that Sheila was the killer so there would be no need to conceal.

[JackieD]

I might be back for a fleeting few visits. My belief has never changed . Unfortunately family circumstances forced me to take a few steps back for a while .

I am sorry you have had family problems Jan. I have always known how you felt about the case

[JackieD]

I don't believe she was reasoned with at the barrel of a gun. She had no idea what was happening for those few seconds she was dragged across the corridor into the master bedroom, stumbled over June, told to lie down whereupon Jeremy precipitously fired the first report, hence the mistake.

I know one thing, there is not a mother living who would just lie down on command if her children had been killed or were in danger

Steve you cannot possible get in the mind of a mother in that situation

[Adam]

Not sure what Jan's form of support is going to be. If she stays.

Charging around the forum disputing over 200 pieces of published evidence is a bit of a waste of time. It's been published & that can't change.

David said all the evidence which convicted Bamber is due to 'forgery & perjury'. This approach is best one for supporters. It just needs to be worked out how this huge undertaking was organised.

[Steve_uk]

I know one thing, there is not a mother living who would just lie down on command if her children had been killed or were in danger

Steve you cannot possible get in the mind of a mother in that situation

Jackie she was sick. If you don't get this about Sheila you will never understand the case.

[JackieD]

Not sure what Jan's form of support is going to be. If she stays.

Charging around the forum disputing over 200 pieces of published evidence is a bit of a waste of time. It's been published & that can't change.

David said all the evidence which convicted Bamber is due to 'forgery & perjury'. This approach is best one for supporters. It just needs to be worked out how this huge undertaking was organised.

Don't worry your head Adam, Jan will probably put you on ignore if she has limited time to spend on the forum

[Jan]

Not sure what Jan's form of support is going to be. If she stays.

Charging around the forum disputing over 200 pieces of published evidence is a bit of a waste of time. It's been published & that can't change.

David said all the evidence which convicted Bamber is due to 'forgery & perjury'. This approach is best one for supporters. It just needs to be worked out how this huge undertaking was organised.

It is not for you to say what is best for supporters. We are all individuals .

[JackieD]

Jackie she was sick. If you don't get this about Sheila you will never understand the case.

I know exactly how ill Sheila was a lot more than you and that's why this tragedy happened

One day this case will help mental health charities promote how someone can get help when in a desperate situation like Sheila

[Jan]

Not sure what Jan's form of support is going to be. If she stays.

Charging around the forum disputing over 200 pieces of published evidence is a bit of a waste of time. It's been published & that can't change.

David said all the evidence which convicted Bamber is due to 'forgery & perjury'. This approach is best one for supporters. It just needs to be worked out how this huge undertaking was organised.

I thought you might have missed my posts? And if I am wasting my time you certainly are because you Don't even have questions to ask.

Why do you think the evidence of photos of Sheila's hands is the opposite of what was presented to the jury?
.

[JackieD]

I thought you might have missed my posts? And if I am wasting my time you certainly are because you Don't even have questions to ask.

Why do you think the evidence of photos of Sheila's hands is the opposite of what was presented to the jury?
.

And that's exactly why you have been so missed x

[susan]

I thought you might have missed my posts? And if I am wasting my time you certainly are because you Don't even have questions to ask.

Why do you think the evidence of photos of Sheila's hands is the opposite of what was presented to the jury?
.

Jan sadly Adam only sees what suits him nobody can say Sheila's hands were clean and believe it.

[susan]

And that's exactly why you have been so missed x

Jackie
I agree with you Jan is a great poster and the forum has really missed her.

[JackieD]

Jackie
I agree with you Jan is a great poster and the forum has really missed her.

Susan as I have said before there are lots of people read all updates on this forum but don't post for obvious reasons
I am just so happy to be reading Jans posts again

[Roch]

I can't even see any scrapes, I think you're all imagining it.

If the image had been put up 2014 before you turned guilty, I don't think you would have had any difficulty seeing the scrapes or their source nail gouges.  But you have boxed your-self in now, on the opposition benches with the hardline guilters.  So you  have to try and bluff it out and play 🙈