Last chance: Questions on the relatives fabricating the silencer:

[Adam]

That's the problem. Adam just says 'there is a mountain in the library' and hopes you don't look -



Because there is nothing there.

I wouldn't call 50+ pieces empty. But keep fire fighting.

Where did you deliver you're 'make believe' palm print/forensic evidence breakthrough from/to in you're 'make believe' meeting with Bamber's legal advisors ? Oh yes, you wouldn't tell me.

[David1819]

It's ok, now the relatives have been ruled out, you can still support Bamber.

You are in denial.

[susan]

Blood from a rabbit? I think you got your silly notions mixed up. 

Hahaha David you don't want to hear about my other silly notions you will go into total shock I did read about a mixture of AK something forgot the rest but it did mention rabbit will try and find it then you will think I am so clever

[Adam]

Hahaha David you don't want to hear about my other silly notions you will go into total shock I did read about a mixture of AK something forgot the rest but it did mention rabbit will try and find it then you will think I am so clever

Do you believe Stan Jones managed to fabricate a silencer,  & then asked the relatives to lie in their WS's and say they found it ?

If you won't commit to this, I'll have to assume you believe Bamber used the silencer.

Just saying you believe is innocent & not offerring any supportong evidence is not enough.

[David1819]

I wouldn't call 50+ pieces empty. But keep fire fighting.

Where did you deliver you're 'make believe' palm print/forensic evidence breakthrough from/to in you're 'make believe' meeting with Bamber's legal advisors ? Oh yes, you wouldn't tell me.

How many pieces exactly? It seems to change depending on the day.

Only 100+ pieces. But since when was that enough for supporters ?

30 pieces of forensic evidence incriminating Bamber.  Eighteen link Bamber directly to the scene.

28 pieces of forensic evidence.

200 pieces of forensic and circumstantial evidence.

33 forensic points which link Bamber to the crime.

[Adam]

How many pieces exactly? It seems to change depending on the day.

The last count, there were 42 threads. Several of them mention more than one piece.

So I've generously said 50+ to you and recently Lookout. Only one piece is needed for a conviction. But good to know there are 49+ more.

But at least you've got you're 'forensic evidence breakthrough'.

[susan]

Hahaha David you don't want to hear about my other silly notions you will go into total shock I did read about a mixture of AK something forgot the rest but it did mention rabbit will try and find it then you will think I am so clever

David AK-1 Enzyme in humans is also found in rabbits and game which would have been used with the silencer on the rifle have you got a clue where I am coming from I don't hahaha

[susan]

Do you believe Stan Jones managed to fabricate a silencer,  & then asked the relatives to lie in their WS's and say they found it ?

If you won't commit to this, I'll have to assume you believe Bamber used the silencer.

Just saying you believe is innocent & not offerring any supportong evidence is not enough.

Adam I understand the relatives found the silencer at the back of the cupboard (wonder what they were looking for searching cupboards) in a house not belonging to them hey presto they found a silencer and put it in the boot of their car (unprotected) think it had one grey hair and a flake of blood on it took it home then at sometime gave it to EP but lost the hair in transit.  What happened next I can guess but wont do I may be wrong but it was never used in the murders anyhow so why are we talking about it

[Adam]

Adam I understand the relatives found the silencer at the back of the cupboard (wonder what they were looking for searching cupboards) in a house not belonging to them hey presto they found a silencer and put it in the boot of their car (unprotected) think it had one grey hair and a flake of blood on it took it home then at sometime gave it to EP but lost the hair in transit.  What happened next I can guess but wont do I may be wrong but it was never used in the murders anyhow so why are we talking about it

The evidence says it was used in the murders. It had Sheila's blood and the aga paint on.

You are just going to say the silencer wasn't used. But not justify this stance by showing how Stan Jones managed to fabricate it & convince the relatives to lie in their WS's.

[susan]

The evidence says it was used in the murders. It had Sheila's blood and the aga paint on.

You are just going to say the silencer wasn't used. But not justify this stance by showing how Stan Jones managed to fabricate it & convince the relatives to lie in their WS's.

Adam I will not say anything about Stan Jones and the fabrication of the silencer I know  nothing about it.  Sorry.

[Adam]

Adam I will not say anything about Stan Jones and the fabrication of the silencer I know  nothing about it.  Sorry.

It's a pity so many supporters won't discuss the evidence.

JackieD just says Bamber is innocent because Julie identified the twins. Last week refusing to answer any questions after making the serious accusation that the relatives fabricated the silencer.

Nugs & Lookout refuse to say how Bamber committed the massacre or answer any questions while Roch just says the.police hid evidence.

Lucy says Bamber is innocent because AE gave BC Nevill's wallet while Buddy says Bamber should have 'lobbed Julie overboard'.

I thought you might be supporting Bamber as you could show how all the evidence was incorrect. But was wrong.

[susan]

It's a pity so many supporters won't discuss the evidence.

JackieD just says Bamber is innocent because Julie identified the twins. Last week refusing to answer any questions after making the serious accusation that the relatives fabricated the silencer.

Nugs & Lookout refuse to say how Bamber committed the massacre or answer any questions while Roch just says the.police hid evidence.

Lucy says Bamber is innocent because AE gave BC Nevill's wallet while Buddy says Bamber should have 'lobbed Julie overboard'.

I thought you might be supporting Bamber as you could show how all the evidence was incorrect. But was wrong.

Adam you convince me Bamber is guilty I am saying Sheila is guilty

[Adam]

Adam you convince me Bamber is guilty I am saying Sheila is guilty

I'm not trying to convince you.

Just asking if you believe Stan Jones fabricated the silencer. As the evidence at trial was it had Sheila's blood & the aga paint on.

You just say you  'know nothing about it'.

[susan]

I'm not trying to convince you.

Just asking if you believe Stan Jones fabricated the silencer. As the evidence at trial was it had Sheila's blood & the aga paint on.

You just say you  'know nothing about it'.

Adam the same man who told Bill about the suicide note fabricated the silencer with blood and paint from the Ada.

[Adam]

Adam the same man who told Bill about the suicide note fabricated the silencer with blood and paint from the Ada.

Really ? Hopefully Bill will reveal who this was.

At the moment he has just said "a man told me".