0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Similar to David's palm print/'forensic evidence breakthough, it is disappointing that Roch, Jackie & Mike have information on here which they won't share on the forum. Or even say where they got it from. Not sure why they mention it in the first place. Especially Roch who mentions his inside information daily and says it shows Sheila "definately committed the massacre". Mike's picture of Sheila on the bed would also be very helpful to Bamber. Mike said a long time ago it was given to his lawyers, but there has been no further updates. Most of Jackie's posts are about Julie, so it would have made a change if she had enlightened the forum with details of the "new information" she said she had received on the 13th May. However Jackie has refused point blank to expand. Not sure why new information is withheld on this forum. Withholding new evidence or keeping secret on what is being investigated is not a tactic of Bamber, the OS, 360 & the CT. Who all use the media & internet to tell the world what is happening.
Imagine leaked information in the wrong hands.
lookout any information regarding new evidence has to be kept totally secret and not shared at all
As mentioned Bamber's team promoted the evidence it was presenting to the CCRC in 2012.
Currently the best way to promote Bamber's innocence is to either say EP are holding onto things, or that new information is known which is never revealed. The 360 says it is carrying out tests on released evidence, but does not publish results.
Why worry. The system has him sewn up every which way
It's very doubtful there will be another CCRC application. If there is you've said it will be rejected due to bias against Bamber. ìSo there is nothing to lose in you & Jackie submitting you're new information on here. And Mike posting his photo. You've all already told the forum you have this.Where did you get this information from & have you hand delivered it to Bamber's legal team, as David did with his palm print/forensic evidence breakthrough ?
I am fascinated by your eagerness to find out what the new evidence is. Why are you even interested when you have repeatedly listed all the reasons why he is guilty, when you have said there is a pile of evidence against JB etc. Are you a but rattled Adam?
I think he is maggie 😀I'd rather not know if it helps the legal team. I'm sure it will all come out in the end. Patience isn't one of Adams good poin't.
