A question for Jackie:

[lookout]

Jeremy's predicament has been created by " other people " so therefore he and supporters are within their right to blame such people for their failings.

 

[guest2181]

Jeremy's predicament has been created by " other people " so therefore he and supporters are within their right to blame such people for their failings.

Other people DID NOT make Jeremy commit mass murder.

[lookout]

Other people DID NOT make Jeremy commit mass murder.

Other people made sure he had done.
In my books he didn't commit mass murder or any other kind of murder.

[Roch]

Other people DID NOT make Jeremy commit mass murder.

Agree 100%

[Roch]

Of course another more measured view could be that something is recorded, without attaching particular significance. When this 'something' is then offered up with a usually skewed interpretation, the lack of significance originally applied still remains.

What if something was evidenced during the course of procedural thorougness, yet with a high degree of relevance also?  Then, later, it is presented with a skewed interpretation, to invert its significance?

[Caroline]

What if something was evidenced during the course of precedural thorougness, yet with a high degree of relevance also?  Then, later, it is presented with a skewed interpretation, to invert its significance?

Perhaps it's been skewed recently. 

[Roch]

Perhaps it's been skewed recently.

I can only offer you my assurance that it hasn't.  Probably not enough, granted 

[Roch]

Perhaps it's been skewed recently.

Just noticed a typo in my post.  Posts are littered - starting to wonder if it's an age thing.  'Precedural'  was meant to be procedural.

[Caroline]

I can only offer you my assurance that it hasn't.  Probably not enough, granted 

How do you know? How do you know that what is being put forward (from whoever) hasn't been twisted to fit an innocent perspective?

[Adam]

What is being put forward ?

[Roch]

How do you know? How do you know that what is being put forward (from whoever) hasn't been twisted to fit an innocent perspective?

The simple answer is as follows:  When this particular evidence was noted, it was done so without any attempt to hide Sheila's involvement in the killings.  It is from day 1.  Jeremy was not a suspect.  There was no motive to conceal her involvement. 

What you are suggesting above - is actually the correct situation in reverse.  The 'twisted to fit' was carried out during the second investigation - not the first.

[Adam]

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/707781/Jeremy-Bamber-supporters-claim-police-ignored-sister-suicide-note-white-farm-essex/amp&ved=0ahUKEwiY-o6v__PTAhXmC8AKHfBGBdEQFggpMAI&usg=AFQjCNGY5aBchNMy3HtKC0qrIrapNJ7y3g

Hopefully the CT can give an update on the forensic tests on Sheila's hand written notes. They have had 8 months to do the tests since mentioning them.

Otherwise it has to be assummed the tests came to nothing.

[maggie]

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/707781/Jeremy-Bamber-supporters-claim-police-ignored-sister-suicide-note-white-farm-essex/amp&ved=0ahUKEwiY-o6v__PTAhXmC8AKHfBGBdEQFggpMAI&usg=AFQjCNGY5aBchNMy3HtKC0qrIrapNJ7y3g

Hopefully the CT can give an update on the forensic tests on Sheila's hand written notes. They have had 8 months to do the tests since mentioning them.

Otherwise it has to be assummed the tests came to nothing.

Imo even if the tests come to nothing it only means Sheila didn't write that letter. It doesn't mean she wasn't involved in the massacre. That's a different question.

[susan]

Imo even if the tests come to nothing it only means Sheila didn't write that letter. It doesn't mean she wasn't involved in the massacre. That's a different question.

Hi Maggie I agree with you if the tests prove Sheila did not write that letter this does not mean she did not murder her family then kill herself.  The only way the CT can be certain is to get a Graphologist to look at the documents maybe they have done this who knows

[Adam]

Hi Maggie I agree with you if the tests prove Sheila did not write that letter this does not mean she did not murder her family then kill herself.  The only way the CT can be certain is to get a Graphologist to look at the documents maybe they have done this who knows

Everyone agrees Sheila wrote the notes, don't they ?

It's weather the notes suggest Sheila was planning to committ suicide & take other people with her.

As there has been no annoncenent in the last 8 months,  It can only assumed they didn't.