A question for Jackie:

[lookout]

Anything that's " leaked " will be torn to shreds by the media who will have been contacted by those involved in the case who are waiting with baited breath to block any thought of an appeal " because of fears for families ". After the EU ruling on life sentences,relatives were in touch with MP's and the local media,as well as EP, so any chances of a re-trial/acquittal will fall heavily on those who are working in the background in support of Jeremy,to present a " startling " result. 
 

[maggie]

Anything that's " leaked " will be torn to shreds by the media who will have been contacted by those involved in the case who are waiting with baited breath to block any thought of an appeal " because of fears for families ". After the EU ruling on life sentences,relatives were in touch with MP's and the local media,as well as EP, so any chances of a re-trial/acquittal will fall heavily on those who are working in the background in support of Jeremy,to present a " startling " result. 
 

I agree with you Lookout but if there is unassailable evidence his team will be in a strong position to face down the opposition. For that reason his team need to have drawn all the strands together and be rock solid before they make their move, whatever they believe that move should be.

[lookout]

I agree with you Lookout but if there is unassailable evidence his team will be in a strong position to face down the opposition. For that reason his team need to have drawn all the strands together and be rock solid before they make their move, whatever they believe that move should be.

Indeed Maggie. One thing in its favour is that the power of detection this 30 odd years on is so much improved by the technology we now have,plus the brain-power that goes with it. 30 years might not seem the longest of times,but those of a certain age can see vast improvements in certain areas thanks to study and the knowledge, in helping us move forward and to get things right before committing.

[Caroline]

Not my remit or my evidence. I understand what you mean though.  I think the CT are advised by pro-bono legal team on aspects of evidence. I'm not involved.

But they told you about it?

[Caroline]

Anything that's " leaked " will be torn to shreds by the media who will have been contacted by those involved in the case who are waiting with baited breath to block any thought of an appeal " because of fears for families ". After the EU ruling on life sentences,relatives were in touch with MP's and the local media,as well as EP, so any chances of a re-trial/acquittal will fall heavily on those who are working in the background in support of Jeremy,to present a " startling " result. 
 

If such evience can't stand up to scrutiny, then it's not worth it's salt.

[Caroline]

I agree with you Lookout but if there is unassailable evidence his team will be in a strong position to face down the opposition. For that reason his team need to have drawn all the strands together and be rock solid before they make their move, whatever they believe that move should be.

Roch said that originally, the way the evidence was presented allowed it to be seen in a certain way that favoured the prosecution. What we could be looking at is simply a different presentation biased the other way. But apparently, this 'evidence' couldn't be used anyway and has been in the public domain for a long while, which is why I don't understand why it's such a secret.

Also, Roch's account seems to run along the same lines as Paul Harrison's. What is interesting is that Paul Harrison's account was supposed to have originated from Jeremy himself ie. Sheila was involved but not the mastermind.

[guest2181]

Roch said that originally, the way the evidence was presented allowed it to be seen in a certain way that favoured the prosecution. What we could be looking at is simply a different presentation biased the other way. But apparently, this 'evidence' couldn't be used anyway and has been in the public domain for a long while, which is why I don't understand why it's such a secret.

Also, Roch's account seems to run along the same lines as Paul Harrison's. What is interesting is that Paul Harrison's account was supposed to have originated from Jeremy himself ie. Sheila was involved but not the mastermind.

I can't help but feel we've heard it all before. Such claims are another on going theme, usually they either don't materialise, or if they do then they don't equate to what is claimed.

[lookout]

If such evience can't stand up to scrutiny, then it's not worth it's salt.

Not necessarily.

[Caroline]

Not necessarily.

So if it can't stand up to scrutiny please indicate what use it has?

[lookout]

So if it can't stand up to scrutiny please indicate what use it has?

There'll be far more in-depth methods used,even for that which has been presented before,as a handful of forensics are doing the scrutinising this time without a stone unturned.In other words a more thorough job than was ever done.

[Caroline]

There'll be far more in-depth methods used,even for that which has been presented before,as a handful of forensics are doing the scrutinising this time without a stone unturned.In other words a more thorough job than was ever done.

If something doesn't stand up to scrutiny from a group of amateurs, experts will just demolish it.

[lookout]

If something doesn't stand up to scrutiny from a group of amateurs, experts will just demolish it.

So they're all amateurs who are working for the CT team ?

[Caroline]

So they're all amateurs who are working for the CT team ?

I was specifically talking about this forum but yes, the CT are also amateurs. His legal team are not.

[guest2181]

So they're all amateurs who are working for the CT team ?

Yes, and even worse, deluded amateurs with poor graveside manners!

[Caroline]

Yes, and even worse, deluded amateurs with poor graveside manners!

Ain't THAT the truth!