Author Topic: A question for Jackie:  (Read 29085 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #45 on: May 13, 2017, 03:22:PM »
Yeah right! He was 25 years old, Sleeping where and with whom he wanted without restraint. Do you REALLY believe he'd have given that up to go live with his parents? Even more so considering he must have been so desperate to move out in the first place that the couple living in his cottage were evicted so he could move in.

Jane it's completely normal for a man of that age want to move out of thier parents house. When my son was 24 off he went and bought his own house,  I cannot describe the love I feel for my kids but boy oh boy my son was a selfish lazy so and so when he lived at home and believe me it wasn't for the want of asking, telling him to pick his towels ups from his bathroom floor or to put his clean washing away!  We used to have some humdinger of rows, especially with his dad wHo used to get really wound up but it's normal . No amount t of rows or my reluctance to admit that he was many a time on the verge of driving me insane would I feel anything g but love for him when it came down to it and I have absolutely no doubt that June would have felt the same about jeremy and shiela.

Both my kids have told me they hate me and I'm pretty certain that in the heat of the moment  they probably meant it but not when things had calmed down and I would get a hug or a kiss and a sorry mum.

Let's face it jeremy had quite a lot to deal with regarding his mum didn't he. She was suffering mental health problems , had taken religion to another level and it did affect his life so who wouldn'twant to leave home. None of that means he didn't love her. Of course he did.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21095
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #46 on: May 13, 2017, 03:42:PM »
Read the letter June sent Jeremy and look at the photos it obvious

Also he did NOT hate farming
It was an occupation he was forced into and was shackled to until the demise of his parents. He could have walked away but that would have meant risking his mother's wealth.

  http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1935.0.html

I have removed the last sentence of your post as it was unnecessary personal comment about another poster.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 06:36:PM by maggie »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #47 on: May 13, 2017, 04:02:PM »
Jane it's completely normal for a man of that age want to move out of thier parents house. When my son was 24 off he went and bought his own house,  I cannot describe the love I feel for my kids but boy oh boy my son was a selfish lazy so and so when he lived at home and believe me it wasn't for the want of asking, telling him to pick his towels ups from his bathroom floor or to put his clean washing away!  We used to have some humdinger of rows, especially with his dad wHo used to get really wound up but it's normal . No amount t of rows or my reluctance to admit that he was many a time on the verge of driving me insane would I feel anything g but love for him when it came down to it and I have absolutely no doubt that June would have felt the same about jeremy and shiela.

Both my kids have told me they hate me and I'm pretty certain that in the heat of the moment  they probably meant it but not when things had calmed down and I would get a hug or a kiss and a sorry mum.

Let's face it jeremy had quite a lot to deal with regarding his mum didn't he. She was suffering mental health problems , had taken religion to another level and it did affect his life so who wouldn'twant to leave home. None of that means he didn't love her. Of course he did.

Thank-you for that, Notsure. The love you bear your children shines out of what you say. However, it interests me hugely, that nowhere do you speak of adoration for them. Your relationship with them, though, sounds healthy, happy and honest. A far cry from that which I believe Jeremy's to have been, other than in his imagination.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #48 on: May 13, 2017, 04:10:PM »
It was an occupation he was forced into and was shackled to until the demise of his parents. He could have walked away but that would have meant risking his mother's wealth.
  http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1935.0.html


I have done plenty of research unlike you who continually quotes from books

I have had long conversations with Jeremy and I have spoken to people who he grew up with
I have spoken to his lie detector tester
I have done way more research than you
Could you refrain from being rude
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 06:40:PM by maggie »
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #49 on: May 13, 2017, 05:48:PM »
I have done plenty of research unlike you who continually quotes from books

I have had long conversations with Jeremy and I have spoken to people who he grew up with
I have spoken to his lie detector tester
I have done way more research than you
Could you refrain from being rude

Jackie you are closer to people connected with Jeremy than most on here and I know you have in the past worked very hard to try and help Jeremy and you are still giving your all for Steve to make the comments he did I think very unfair.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21095
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #50 on: May 13, 2017, 06:22:PM »
Jackie you are closer to people connected with Jeremy than most on here and I know you have in the past worked very hard to try and help Jeremy and you are still giving your all for Steve to make the comments he did I think very unfair.
Oh susan did I go over the top..

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21095
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #51 on: May 13, 2017, 06:25:PM »
I suppose for those who consider him innocent it explains many of your behaviours. For those of us who believe him to be a child killer there's no such dilemma involved when we unleash our vitriol.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #52 on: May 13, 2017, 06:56:PM »
Jackie you are closer to people connected with Jeremy than most on here and I know you have in the past worked very hard to try and help Jeremy and you are still giving your all for Steve to make the comments he did I think very unfair.

Thank you Susan
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #53 on: May 13, 2017, 07:04:PM »
http://www.bestsongspk.com/watch/FdnAlSBNceM

Susan I have not done much lately but after I received new information I would like a six part documentary made on the murders.  There is only one person for the job so I am pushing for that at the moment

There has to be a series for maximum impact
Above is an old video that got over 1000 views

We have to get the case out there in detail to get to the truth
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #54 on: May 13, 2017, 07:09:PM »
http://www.bestsongspk.com/watch/FdnAlSBNceM

Susan I have not done much lately but after I received new information I would like a six part documentary made on the murders.  There is only one person for the job so I am pushing for that at the moment

There has to be a series for maximum impact
Above is an old video that got over 1000 views

We have to get the case out there in detail to get to the truth

I liked how it was very different from mine.  I like to think that when I made mine, there was some very raw talen there   :))

They were a bit naff to be honest. If I was to make one again, it would be in a similar vein to the others but more subtle.  It was a rewarding, if gruelling process. 

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #55 on: May 13, 2017, 07:15:PM »
I liked how it was very different from mine.  I like to think that when I made mine, there was some very raw talen there   :))

They were a bit naff to be honest. If I was to make one again, it would be in a similar vein to the others but more subtle.  It was a rewarding, if gruelling process.

That wasn't one of yours was it roch?  :o
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21095
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #56 on: May 13, 2017, 07:30:PM »
Of course presentation is the key rather than substance.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #57 on: May 13, 2017, 07:31:PM »
That wasn't one of yours was it roch?  :o

No the above is one of Jackie's.  I liked how it was very different from mine.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 07:32:PM by Roch »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #58 on: May 13, 2017, 07:47:PM »
I think it's a lovely video given the circumstances. I remember seeing it quite a while back.

A hard-hitting one next ?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #59 on: May 13, 2017, 08:51:PM »
http://www.bestsongspk.com/watch/FdnAlSBNceM

Susan I have not done much lately but after I received new information I would like a six part documentary made on the murders.  There is only one person for the job so I am pushing for that at the moment

There has to be a series for maximum impact
Above is an old video that got over 1000 views

We have to get the case out there in detail to get to the truth

Jackie Good Luck hope you secure the services of the person you want for the Documentary :)