Author Topic: A question for Jackie:  (Read 29161 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #30 on: May 13, 2017, 02:18:PM »
To which particular letter do you refer, and to which photos? From whom did you learn that Jeremy didn't hate farming?

From Jeremy numerous times on the phone
Straight from the horses mouth
The photos are on the Internet and June's letter to Jeremy is too
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #31 on: May 13, 2017, 02:18:PM »

Don't be rude or I will report you

I have not seen a post where you provide proof June offered to GIVE over £100,000 to Mugford

Reply 1.

Please keep up.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #32 on: May 13, 2017, 02:19:PM »
Of course June adored her son,and he her.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #33 on: May 13, 2017, 02:31:PM »




He may well have done to allow Sheila to live at Goldhanger in Jeremy's house as suggested. He could have had his own room back at WHF during the week and spent his weekends at Julie's.

Yeah right! He was 25 years old, Sleeping where and with whom he wanted without restraint. Do you REALLY believe he'd have given that up to go live with his parents? Even more so considering he must have been so desperate to move out in the first place that the couple living in his cottage were evicted so he could move in.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #34 on: May 13, 2017, 02:35:PM »
From Jeremy numerous times on the phone
Straight from the horses mouth
The photos are on the Internet and June's letter to Jeremy is too

Hmm, That's exactly what I mean. Jeremy's ISN'T the horse's moth. THAT would have been June. As I said, the only time's I've ever heard the word "adored" used as a description, by an adult child of how a parent felt about them AS child, on closer examination, it's proved not to be the case.

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #35 on: May 13, 2017, 02:40:PM »
His only reason for moving out was because June didn't hit it off with Julie so the only remedy was for him to go somewhere where Julie wouldn't be met with hostility and that was Goldhanger----to which June objected to Julie living there with him,so the solution being that June allegedly buys/rents somewhere miles away for Julie to live--------which speaks volumes to me.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #36 on: May 13, 2017, 02:43:PM »
His only reason for moving out was because June didn't hit it off with Julie so the only remedy was for him to go somewhere where Julie wouldn't be met with hostility and that was Goldhanger----to which June objected to Julie living there with him,so the solution being that June allegedly buys/rents somewhere miles away for Julie to live--------which speaks volumes to me.

From Julie's WS.

"The first day I started there as a waitress I met a boy named Jeremy Nevill Bamber.

He was working there as a barman. I got friendly with Jeremy who at that time was living with Michael Deckers and Malcolm Waters, Elizabeth Rimington at 2 Tusset Mews, Lexden, Colchester".
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2017, 02:51:PM »
His only reason for moving out was because June didn't hit it off with Julie so the only remedy was for him to go somewhere where Julie wouldn't be met with hostility and that was Goldhanger----to which June objected to Julie living there with him,so the solution being that June allegedly buys/rents somewhere miles away for Julie to live--------which speaks volumes to me.

Of course, we DO need proof of that, Lookout. If Jeremy had been THAT keen to stay a WHF all his life, he wouldn't have made excuses to stay away as often as he did. I seem to recall that when Julie first met him, he was living in Colchester -spitting distance from D'Arcy- and she had no idea that he was a 'farmer'.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #38 on: May 13, 2017, 03:00:PM »
You didn't answer the question -

Why did Julie turn down £55,000/£116,000 from June, if she was just with Bamber to be part of a possible future inheritance ?

there is no way June would have put the property in Julie's name. It was imo an offer of somewhere to live other than where she wanted her to live. End of .

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #39 on: May 13, 2017, 03:02:PM »
I don't think Julie would have felt one thing in particular when June made the offer. If she was the gold digger she's being painted as being, surely her first reaction would surely have been along the lines of "Goody, goody, I'm rich. I can live in it, sell it, or let it. I wonder which will give me the best return"!!!!! She was a 20 year old student, NOT a seasoned business woman. Of course, she may have felt insulted by the offer. Humiliated, even. MAYBE she'd been bought up never to accept gifts from strangers? Whatever, I think it has to be accepted that it was never likely that she'd get her hands on it. June could have put it in trust for the twins. I very much doubt she'd have countenanced Julie walking away with the money for it.

Jane do you really believe June and Neville would have purchased a flat and put it in her name. I don't think you really believe that.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #40 on: May 13, 2017, 03:03:PM »
Sorry Jane I hadn't read the whole of your post before I replied, I'm cleaning the kitchen and dipping g in and oug lol. X

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #41 on: May 13, 2017, 03:06:PM »
there is no way June would have put the property in Julie's name. It was imo an offer of somewhere to live other than where she wanted her to live. End of .

June offerred 'to buy' Julie a flat in London. Not pay her rent, not buy for herself & let Julie live there.

June offerred 'to buy' Julie a flat in London.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #42 on: May 13, 2017, 03:08:PM »

"At one stage she accused me of being a harlot or loose woman. She offered to buy me a flat in London or Colchester so I could go and live there so the neighbours didn’t talk. I declined the offer and I was very offended"
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #43 on: May 13, 2017, 03:08:PM »
Reply 1.

Please keep up.

adam I am beginning  to believe you are here to ruffle people's feathers only. You cannot have a debate, you start a thread then just keep repeating what you have said. That isn't debating. If you can't debate then don't bother.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2017, 03:10:PM »
Sorry Jane I hadn't read the whole of your post before I replied, I'm cleaning the kitchen and dipping g in and oug lol. X

Glad I saw this before posting a rather testy response ;D ;D ;D  Poor you. Can think of more pleasant things to do, than cleaning on Saturday afternoon.