Author Topic: A question for Jackie:  (Read 29055 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2017, 01:48:PM »
There'd have been a clause,June wasn't stupid. Controlling people usually have everything worked out to their advantage.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2017, 01:51:PM »
Her main objective would have been that both JB and JM would tire of tooing and froing,thus either one would have found someone else at closer quarters.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2017, 01:58:PM »
Her main objective would have been that both JB and JM would tire of tooing and froing,thus either one would have found someone else at closer quarters.

That might make sense, but wasn't Julie already living in London?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2017, 01:59:PM »
Her main objective would have been that both JB and JM would tire of tooing and froing,thus either one would have found someone else at closer quarters.

There'd have been a clause,June wasn't stupid. Controlling people usually have everything worked out to their advantage.

Are you saying you'd have been prepared to GIVE, a house/flat, lock, stock and free/leasehold, to an offspring's partner, risk the relationship breaking up and the ex walking away with the money you'd paid, all because you wouldn't have them sleeping together? I see NOTHING wrong in June wishing to maintain control of it. I concur that she hoped the distance would break them up.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2017, 02:00:PM »
Whomsoever allegedly said it, I think "hate" is FAR to strong a word to be applied to a devoutly Christian woman. Is there not something in the Bible about hating the wrong, NOT the wrongdoer. If we're discussing premarital sex, Jeremy was a more than willing participant. IF "hate" is applied to Julie, ergo, for the same reason, it must be applied to Jeremy.

Hate is used freely on this forum about Jeremy
Jeremy hated farming
Jeremy hated Sheila
Jeremy hated June
None of which is true

So I am not going to get pulled up saying June hated Mugford

June adored Jeremy and probably saw right through Julie
Julie was a nasty piece of work which ever way you look at it
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2017, 02:00:PM »
That might make sense, but wasn't Julie already living in London?

And what would there have been to prevent Jeremy moving in?

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2017, 02:03:PM »
Has Bamber ever said June hated Julie ? The first I've heard of this is today.

Jackie answering my question on why an apparent greedy Julie turned down £116,000 of today's money because.....June hated Julie ? !

Still waiting for the source where June says she is going to hand over more than £100,000 to Mugford
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #22 on: May 13, 2017, 02:04:PM »
Still waiting for the source where June says she is going to hand over more than £100,000 to Mugford

Reply 11.

Please keep up.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #23 on: May 13, 2017, 02:08:PM »
Hate is used freely on this forum about Jeremy
Jeremy hated farming
Jeremy hated Sheila
Jeremy hated June
None of which is true

So I am not going to get pulled up saying June hated Mugford

June adored Jeremy and probably saw right through Julie
Julie was a nasty piece of work which ever way you look at it

Jeremy was allowed to hate farming. It's inanimate. I don't believe Jeremy cared enough about anyone to raise enough passion to feel hate. He saw people as being expendable, to which, having experienced it, you can corroborate. I wonder who ever said that June "adored" Jeremy. It's not a word which fits with a mother's feelings for her child, but it IS a word that an adult child might use about the feeling of a parent, for them, that they wished were true.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2017, 02:11:PM »
Hate is used freely on this forum about Jeremy
Jeremy hated farming
Jeremy hated Sheila
Jeremy hated June
None of which is true

So I am not going to get pulled up saying June hated Mugford

June adored Jeremy and probably saw right through Julie
Julie was a nasty piece of work which ever way you look at it

Have you got a source that June adored Bamber ?

Julie, Mary Mugford & Bamber testified otherwise.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2017, 02:12:PM »
Jeremy was allowed to hate farming. It's inanimate. I don't believe Jeremy cared enough about anyone to raise enough passion to feel hate. He saw people as being expendable, to which, having experienced it, you can corroborate. I wonder who ever said that June "adored" Jeremy. It's not a word which fits with a mother's feelings for her child, but it IS a word that an adult child might use about the feeling of a parent, for them, that they wished were true.

Read the letter June sent Jeremy and look at the photos it obvious

Also he did NOT hate farming
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2017, 02:15:PM »
Reply 11.

Please keep up.


Don't be rude or I will report you

I have not seen a post where you provide proof June offered to GIVE over £100,000 to Mugford
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2017, 02:15:PM »
And what would there have been to prevent Jeremy moving in?





He may well have done to allow Sheila to live at Goldhanger in Jeremy's house as suggested. He could have had his own room back at WHF during the week and spent his weekends at Julie's.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #28 on: May 13, 2017, 02:16:PM »
Read the letter June sent Jeremy and look at the photos it obvious

Also he did NOT hate farming

To which particular letter do you refer, and to which photos? From whom did you learn that Jeremy didn't hate farming?

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #29 on: May 13, 2017, 02:16:PM »
Have you got a source that June adored Bamber ?

Julie, Mary Mugford & Bamber testified otherwise.


Read the letter June sent Jeremy and look at the photos it obvious
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill